Observational Study to Assess Oxygen Saturation Predictive Power Related to Intradialytic Acute Hypotension (SOGLIA)

December 24, 2012 updated by: Antonio Santoro, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna

Italian Group of Study on the Role of Oxygen Saturation as a Potential Surrogate Marker of Intradialytic Cardiovascular Instability

The aim of the present work was to analyze the short-term variability of SO2 during hemodialysis in sessions with and without hypotension to correlate the SO2 variability to hemodynamic instability.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

During the last 40 years a lot has been achieved in dialysis regarding both monitors safety and membranes overall performances Anyway, intradialytic symptoms still remain a major concern for nephrologists: in particular, hypotension is the most frequent [1].

Intradialytic hemodynamic monitoring systems have been developed to have continuous surveillance of the main hemodynamic variables (heart rate, body temperature, blood pressure itself, cardiac output, ecc…).

In a second moment, the further evolution was towards the retroactive control systems, to force some of the variables involved in the genesis of the hemodynamic stability, along a pre-determined, ideal, trend. In this view, various bio-feedback mechanisms have been proposes along the years, for example, to tackle hypovolemia-related hypotension. Their scientific rationale is the control of either blood volume or directly natremia, in order to pilot plasma refilling towards the vascular compartment [2].

Despite the great achievements obtained, the forecasting of acute hypotension during hemodialysis still remains a complex problem, likely involving more than one variable.

SO2 can be considered an indirect expression of the hemodynamic stability. Moreover, in dialysis, it has always been regarded as a bio-compatibility marker for membranes [3]. Nowadays, SO2 changes during dialysis are easy to measure with a fully, non-invasive sensor assembled on the arterial line.

We planned this study to analyze on a large number of sessions the short-term variability of SO2 during hemodialysis in relationship with hemodynamic tolerance.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
51

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Italy
      • Bologna, Italy, 40057
        • Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria "S. Orsola-Malpighi", Nephrology, Dialysis and Hypertension dpt.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

ESRD patients on RRT with a recent clinical history of acute intradialytic hypotension.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Dialysis vintage > 6 months
  • Well functioning arterovenous fistula or central venous catheter
  • thrice weekly HD treatment schedule
  • Acute hypotensions in the last month before study start > 20% of sessions

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Mental illness
  • life expectancy < 6 months
  • any profiling and/or biofeedback strategies routinely prescribed

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Hypotension-prone patients
The study group included all patients treated with standard HD prone to acute intradialytic hypotension.
Device: Hypotension-prone patients
Hemox optical sensor equips the dialysis monitors used during this trial. It is able to measure continuously, on arterial blood line, oxygen saturation, hematocrit and blood volume reduction.
Other Names:
  • Hemox

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
SO2 short-term variability predictive power
Time Frame: 3 months

SO2 short term variability predictive power was assessed by means of common clinical tests indexes:

sensitivity (number of sessions with effective hypotension correctly classified using SO2 standard deviation analysis)

specificity (number of sessions without hypotension correctly classified using SO2 standard deviation analysis)
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Central venous catheters subgroup analysis
Time Frame: 3 months
This analysis was performed, according to the method described in the Primary Outcome section, only on the group of sessions in which a central catheter was used as vascular access.
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Antonio Santoro, MD, Azienda ospedaliera universitaria "S. Orsola-Malpighi", Bologna, Italy

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 24, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 24, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 3, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 3, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 24, 2012

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CRC-MAL 01

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Intradialytic Hypotension

Clinical Trials on Hypotension-prone patients

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings