Early RA MRI Early Intensive Treatment Study
Effect of Early Intensive Treatment in Chinese Patients With Recent-onset Rheumatoid Arthritis
To compare the effectiveness of two treatment strategies in early rheumatoid arthritis (ERA), namely the delayed usual care and early intensive care, in Hong Kong.
- The delayed usual care reflects the usual treatment practice in Hong Kong
- The early intensive care includes tight monitoring and immediate adjustment of therapy
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Hong Kong, China
- Prince of Wales Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
For usual care group:
- patients with at least 1 tender and swollen joint
- duration of symptoms less than 2 years
- no previous use of DMARDs
For intensive care group:
- patients with at least 1 tender and swollen joint
- duration of symptoms less than 2 years
- no previous use of DMARDs
- patients who fulfill the 2010 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for RA
Exclusion Criteria:
- patients with renal impairment (on dialysis or estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) <30 mL/min/1.73m^2)
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Usual care group
Usual care
|
Usual care is defined as treatment decision at the discretion of the rheumatologists and patients reflecting daily clinical practice
|
|
Active Comparator: Intensive care group
Protocolized intensive treatment
|
Intensive treatment is defined as early diagnosis, frequent assessment (monthly) of disease activity that guides treatment change with the aim to achieve clinical remission based on a tight control protocol
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The proportion of patients who achieve clinical remission
Time Frame: 12 months
|
The clinical remission is defined using the latest ACR/EULAR remission criteria (Boolean criteria)
|
12 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in various patient-reported outcomes
Time Frame: 12 months
|
The various patient-reported outcomes include employment status, Working Ability Index (WAI), disability index of Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) generic measures
|
12 months
|
|
Gains in utility
Time Frame: 12 months
|
The Utility score is calculated by EQ-5D self-report questionnaire, which provides a single index value for health status that can be used in the clinical and economic appraisal.
Value set derived from a Chinese cohort in Beijing is used, since no value set for Hong Kong Chinese population is available.
|
12 months
|
|
Radiographic progression
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Radiographic progression expressed using the van der Hejide modification of the Sharp scored
|
12 months
|
|
ACR 20, 50, 70 responses
Time Frame: 12 months
|
The ACR 20, 50, 70 responses are defined as at least 20%, 50%, 70% improvement in joint swelling and joint tenderness counts, and at least three of five other variables (i.e.
erythrocyte sedimentation rate, HAQ score, pain score, and physicians' and patients' global assessments)
|
12 months
|
|
MRI outcome
Time Frame: 12 months
|
MRI image set is evaluated and scored separately for the presence or absence of MRI erosion, synovitis, and bone marrow oedema.
Bone erosions and bone marrow oedema are evaluated separately in each wrist bone, whereas synovitis is evaluated in the three regions of the wrist joint: the radioulnar area, the radiocarpal area, and the intercarpal-carpometacarpal area.
|
12 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Lai Shan Tam, MD, Chinese University of Hong Kong
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimated)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- ERA-MRI-2012
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.