Study of Respiratory Depression When Using a Hydromorphone Pain Protocol

March 6, 2020 updated by: Albert Einstein Healthcare Network

"Does a 1 Plus 1 Hydromorphone Pain Protocol Have a Similar Rate of Respiratory Depression to Physician Discretion Protocol in a Geriatric Population With Moderate to Severe Pain?"

This is a study about the efficiency and safety of a 1mg+1mg hydromorphone pain management protocol for the treatment of moderate to sever pain in the Emergency Department. Appropriate patients 60 years and older who present with a condition that causes moderate to severe pain, according to the attending physician's judgment, in which the physician would order the use of parenteral analgesia will be enrolled in one of two study arms, "1+1" versus usual care group. 1+1 patients will receive 1mg hydromorphone followed by another 1mg after 15 minutes if pain persists. Usual care group patients will have pain treated per the discretion of the attending physician. Respiratory status, vital signs, and pain scores will be monitor to assess the efficiency of pain control as well as the safety of pain medicine administration in terms of respiratory depression.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Terminated

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This is a study about the efficiency and safety of a 1mg+1mg hydromorphone pain management protocol for the treatment of long bone fractures in the Emergency Department. Appropriate patients 60 years and older who present with a condition that causes moderate to severe pain, according to the attending physician's judgment, in which the physician would order the use of parenteral analgesia will be screened and randomized to one of two study arms, "1+1" versus usual care group. Neither the research associate, nurse, or attending physician will be blinded to the patients randomization. Patient pain score will be assessed at baseline using VAS score. "1+1" patients will receive 1mg hydromorphone at "timepoint 0" (baseline) followed by another 1mg after 15 minutes (along with repeat VAS pain score) if the patient answers "yes" to "Do you need more pain medicine?" At 60 minutes, patient pain will be assessed a final time and if patient needs more pain medicine, additional treatment will be dictated by physician discretion. Usual care group patients will also have VAS pain scores assessed at timepoint 0, 15 and 60 minutes and will have pain treated per the discretion of the attending physician. Patients will be placed on capnometer for continuous monitoring of respiratory status to guard against any opioid induced respiratory depression. Respiratory status, vital signs, and pain scores will be monitor to assess the efficiency of pain control as well as the safety of pain medicine administration in terms of respiratory depression. We propose that the "1+1" hydromorphone protocol is easy to implement, as it includes a set timeline, a standard question, and a set dosage of a potent analgesic. We hypothesize that it will provide adequate analgesia in the majority of patients without causing the anticipated level of respiratory depression.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
116

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19141
        • Albert Einstein Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Any patient who presents a condition that causes moderate to severe pain, according to the attending physician's judgment, in which the physician would order the use of parenteral analgesia
  2. Able to provide consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient or family member unable to consent
  2. Altered mental status
  3. SpO2 less than 95 percent
  4. Allergy to opiates
  5. Hypotension (Systolic blood pressure less than 90 mmHg)
  6. Chronic oxygen dependency or known CO2 retention
  7. Acute ETOH or drug intoxication
  8. History of chronic pain syndrome or chronic use of opiate narcotics
  9. History of opiate/heroin addiction, past or current.
  10. End stage renal disease/dialysis patient
  11. Chronic metabolic acidosis
  12. Physician feels that patient would be poor candidate for study
  13. Weight less than 100 pounds, all patients will be weighted
  14. Patients younger than 60 years of age

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: 1mg + 1mg Hydromorphone
Patient will receive 1 mg of hydromorphone for pain at timepoint 0. After 15 minutes, patients will be asked if the still need pain medication. If yes, patients will immediately receive 1mg hydromorphone. Patients will be under continuous monitoring for respiratory depression via capnometer. At 60 minutes, pain will be re-assessed for a second time. If needed, physician will give additional pain meds per their discretion.
Drug: Hydromorphone
1mg of Hydromorphone at timepoint 0 and 1 mg of hydromorphone at 15 min timepoint.
Other Names:
  • Dilaudid
Active Comparator: Usual Care Group
Patient will receive pain medicine per doctor's discretion at timepoint 0. After 15 minutes, patients will be asked if they still need pain medication. If yes, physicians will not be notified and patient will continue to have pain managed as deemed necessary by physician per "usual care." Patients will be under continuous monitoring for respiratory depression via capnometer. At 60 minutes, pain will be re-assessed for a second time. If needed, physician will give additional pain meds per their discretion.
Drug: Usual care group
Patient will have pain treated at timepoint 0 as per usual care based on physician discretion. At 15 min timepoint, patients will be asked for pain level, and then subsequently treated as per physician discretion.
Other Names:
  • Dilaudid
  • Morphine
  • Other IV opioid medications

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Respiratory Depression
Time Frame: From administration of drug (time 0 minutes) to end of study (60 minute mark)
Incidence of respiratory depression (defined as a ETCO2 of 50 mmHg or greater, a 10% change from baseline, or loss of waveform for 15 seconds or greater)
From administration of drug (time 0 minutes) to end of study (60 minute mark)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Successful Treatment of Patient Pain
Time Frame: 15 min and 60 min after baseline
Defined as: Declining additional pain medication at 15 minutes or requesting additional pain medication at 15 min, but declining at 60 minutes
15 min and 60 min after baseline
Change in VAS Score
Time Frame: 15 min and 60 min after baseline
A 13 mm change or greater on a VAS score
15 min and 60 min after baseline
Hypoxia
Time Frame: From administration of drug (time 0 minutes) to end of study (60 minute mark)
Defined as SpO2 of 93% or less for 15 seconds
From administration of drug (time 0 minutes) to end of study (60 minute mark)
Hypotension
Time Frame: Every 5 minutes from administration of drug (time 0 minutes) to end of study (60 minute mark)
Hypotension defined as systolic blood pressure less than 90 mmHg
Every 5 minutes from administration of drug (time 0 minutes) to end of study (60 minute mark)
Allergic Reaction to Study Drug
Time Frame: From administration of drug (time 0 minutes) to end of study (60 minute mark)
From administration of drug (time 0 minutes) to end of study (60 minute mark)
Serious Adverse Events
Time Frame: From administration of drug (time 0 minutes) to end of study (60 minute mark)
Defined as prolonged hypoxia, need for positive pressure ventilation or intubation, hospital admission secondary to study drug.
From administration of drug (time 0 minutes) to end of study (60 minute mark)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Albert Einstein Healthcare Network

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 16, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 16, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 25, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 5, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 6, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 19, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 6, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • HN - 4325

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings