Digoxin Versus Ivabradine in Heart Failure With Preserved Systolic Function (DIGvsIVA)

January 30, 2017 updated by: Cocco G., M.D., Cocco, Giuseppe, M.D.

Comparison of Digoxin and Ivabradine in Heart Failure With Preserved Systolic Function.

This is an investigator-started study. The trial is coded as no. GC&PJ-Dig-Iva2009-2012.

The authors have no conflict of interest and there was no financial sponsoring The study was planned according to the Good Clinical Quality standards using an intention-to-treat analysis. The protocol was approved from the ethics committee. Selected patients gave their written informed consent. The family practitioners agreed and obtained the collected data and analysis. Analysis of collected data was performed by a single-blinded author (without knowledge of the used test drug and time of collection of data).

Study Hypothesis: Compare the effect of digoxin and ivabradine in chronic heart failure with permanent atrial fibrillation (ischemic etiology).

Multiple Time Frames: Primary Outcome is measured before and after each medical intervention.

Measurements at baseline and after 3 month of therapy (twice, with the 2 different drugs):

Measurements Severity of dyspnea. Digoxin serum concentration. ECG: Heart rate at rest and during 6-min walking test. Cardiac function (echocardiography): systolic function (ejection rate, left trial size,diastolic function.

Participants were followed (ambulatory observation) for at least 3 months

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Selected patients had chronic coronary artery disease which had been treated with percutaneous dilatation & stenting and/or aortocoronary bypass. The severity of myocardial ischemia had induced heart failure with diastolic dysfunction and preserved systolic function, and permanent AF.

1 Inclusion criteria:

Dyspnea class III NYHA.

Abnormal left ventricular relaxation with preserved (≥52%) ejection fraction (LVEF).

Patients either in sinus rhythm or with permanent atrial fibrillation.

2. Exclusion criteria:

Unstable angina pectoris.

Reduced systolic cardiac function (LVEF<52%).

Normal diastolic function.

Diabetes requiring insulin.

Moderate or severe renal or hepatic dysfunction.

Technically insufficient echocardiography.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
42

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Switzerland
    • Argovia
      • Rheinfelden, Argovia, Switzerland, CH-4310
        • Cardiology office

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

60 years to 78 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with ischemic heart disease and heart failure with preserved systolic function, dyspnea grade III NYHA. Either in sinus rhythm (and possible paroxismal atrial fibrillation) or with permanent atrial fibrillation.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

No need to change concomitant pharmacological therapy in the following months, dyspnea class III NYHA, and abnormal left ventricular relaxation with preserved (≥52%) left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).

Exclusion Criteria:

Unstable myocardial ischemia, reduced systolic cardiac function (LVEF<52%), diabetes mellitus requiring insulin, moderate or severe renal or hepatic dysfunction, or technically insufficient echocardiography.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Crossover
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Digoxin cross-over ivabradine
Digoxin 0,125 mg once a day 5 days per week during 3 months. Ivabradine, 7,5 mg b.id. during 3 months.
Drug: Digoxin and ivabradine
No more details
Other Names:
  • Medical therapy in heart failure with atrial fibrillation.
  • Drugs used: digoxin and ivabradine.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cardiac function (diastolic and systolic function)
Time Frame: After 12-14 weeks
Cardiac function (echocardiography): systolic function (i.e. LVEF) and diastolic function (Doppler E/A ratio, tissue Doppler e/e1 ratio, Doppler deceleration time of the E wave.
After 12-14 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Heart rate and blood pressure.
Time Frame: After 12-14 weeks
Changes in heart rate and blood pressure.
After 12-14 weeks
Dyspnea.
Time Frame: After 12-14.weeks
Changes in dyspnea NYHA class).
After 12-14.weeks
NB-proBNP value
Time Frame: After 12-14 weeks
Changes (serum values) after therapy.
After 12-14 weeks
Body weight
Time Frame: 12-14. weeks
Changes after therapy
12-14. weeks
Left atrial size
Time Frame: After 12-14 weeks
Change (size).
After 12-14 weeks
ECG
Time Frame: After 12-14 weeks
Changes (heart rate,PR-interval, QRS morphology and duration), ST-T segment, other arrhythmias
After 12-14 weeks
Laboratory
Time Frame: After 12-14 weeks
Any changes in hematology, electrolytes, renal and hepatic function.
After 12-14 weeks
Side-effects
Time Frame: After 12-14 weeks
Any side-effects, spontaneously reported or after specific questionining.
After 12-14 weeks
6-min walk test
Time Frame: After 12-14 weeks.
Changes in length of the walk test and heart rate during the test.
After 12-14 weeks.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Cocco, Giuseppe, M.D.

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Cardiology Office, Rheinfelden, Switzerland

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Giuseppe Cocco, MD, Cardiologist, senior lecturer

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

  • Cocco G, Jerie P. Comparison of digoxin and ivabradine in heart failure with preserved systolic function. Submitted to the American Heart Journal.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 5, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 19, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 21, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 1, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 30, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • GC&PJ-Dig-Iva-2009-2012
  • Cocco G, M.D. (Other Grant/Funding Number: Cocco G, MD)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings