Oxidized Omega-3 Supplements With Different Oxidation (GPTPASPAD)

July 12, 2015 updated by: Elena García García, Universidad Miguel Hernandez de Elche

Effect of Omega-3 Dietary Supplements With Different Oxidation Levels in the Lipidic Profile of Women: a Randomized Controlled Trial

The oxidation level of unsaturated fatty acid supplements commercialized in capsules could be a serious problem for manufacturers and a risk to consumers; health by ingesting substances whose effects are not desired. Therefore, the main objective of this paper is to analyze the effect of dietary supplements Omega-3 with different levels of oxidation in the lipid profile of women who consume these supplements. For this purpose the investigators have designed a single-blind, parallel-groups, randomized controlled trial. Finally, 52 women between 25 and 75 years old were randomly distributed into three groups: (1) took 2 capsules/day of one of the less oxidized oil (containing 300 mg EPA + DHA) and diet, (2) took 2 capsules/day of one of the most oxidized oil (containing 300 mg EPA + DHA) and diet and (3) no capsules, only received the diet. There was a 30 days follow-up . All groups followed a low cholesterol diet. Circulating glucose, total cholesterol, triglycerides and glutamic pyruvic transaminase were determined at the beginning and end of a 30 day period.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The assignment of women to distinct groups was carried out following the classification criteria established by (NCEP, 2002), and performed by the research team. Women were randomly assigned to one of three parallel groups, in a near 1:1:1 ratio. Group 1 (n=20) took two capsules per day of less oxidized oil (containing 300 mg EPA-DHA per capsule) and diet. Group 2 (n=18) consumed two capsules per day of oxidized oil (containing 300 mg EPA-DHA per capsule) and diet. Finally, group 3 (n=19) performed the diet but did not take any capsule. Therefore, the design was a single-blind (participants did not know what type of capsule they were receiving), parallel-group, randomized controlled trial conducted at the Miguel Hernández University of Elche (Spain).

Statistical analysis was carried out using STATGRAPHICS Centurion XV software (StatPoint Technologies, Inc. Warrington, VA); likewise, significance was defined at p<0.05. Data are reported as mean standard error of the mean (SEM). Intragroup statistical comparisons were performed using the following hypothesis tests, both parametric and non-parametric: t-test, sign test and signed rank test for paired samples. Intergroup statistical comparisons were performed using the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Kruskal-Wallis hypothesis tests. Also, Fisher least significant difference (LSD)Multiple Range Test and Tukey HSD were used in order to determine which means were significantly different from the others.

Methods for additional analyses Generalized multiple regression was used to statistically analyse the relationships between the variations in the lipid profile and the consumption of w-3 dietary supplements.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
71

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Spain
    • Alicante
      • Elche, Alicante, Spain, 03202
        • Pharmacy Iborra Campos

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

25 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • presence of dyslipemia with no indication of drug treatment
  • blood cholesterol levels ranging 250-300 mg/dL
  • triglycerides (TG) 160-175 mg/dL

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pregnancy
  • lactation
  • participation in another supplementary feeding programme

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Less oxidized oil and diet
Analyze the effect of dietary supplements Omega-3 with different levels of oxidation in the lipid profile of women who consume these supplements. For this purpose we have designed a single-blind, parallel-groups, randomized controlled trial. Participants from group 1 took 2 capsules/day of one of the less oxidized oil (containing 300 mg EPA + DHA) and diet. Follow-up 30 days
Dietary supplement: Less oxidized oil and diet
Analyze the effect of dietary supplements Omega-3 with different levels of oxidation in the lipid profile of women who consume these supplements. For this purpose we have designed a single-blind, parallel-groups, randomized controlled trial. Finally 52 women between 25 and 75 years old randomly were distributed into three groups. Participants from group 1 took 2 capsules/day of one of the less oxidized oil (containing 300 mg EPA + DHA) and diet, . Follow-up 30 days
Other Names:
  • less oxidized oil
Experimental: More oxidized oil and diet
Analyze the effect of dietary supplements Omega-3 with different levels of oxidation in the lipid profile of women who consume these supplements. For this purpose we have designed a single-blind, parallel-groups, randomized controlled trial. Participants from group 2 took 2 capsules/day of one of the most oxidized oil (containing 300 mg EPA + DHA) and diet . Follow-up 30 days
Dietary supplement: More oxidized oil and diet
Analyze the effect of dietary supplements Omega-3 with different levels of oxidation in the lipid profile of women who consume these supplements. For this purpose we have designed a single-blind, parallel-groups, randomized controlled trial. Finally 52 women between 25 and 75 years old randomly were distributed into three groups. Participants from group 2 took 2 capsules/day of one of the more oxidized oil (containing 300 mg EPA + DHA) and diet . Follow-up 30 days
Other Names:
  • More oxidized oil
Experimental: Hypercholesterolemic diet
Analyze the effect of dietary supplements Omega-3 with different levels of oxidation in the lipid profile of women who consume these supplements. For this purpose we have designed a single-blind, parallel-groups, randomized controlled trial. Participants from group 3 only took diet and no capsules. Follow-up 30 days
Drug: Hypercholesterolemic diet
Analyze the effect of dietary supplements Omega-3 with different levels of oxidation in the lipid profile of women who consume these supplements. For this purpose we have designed a single-blind, parallel-groups, randomized controlled trial. Finally 52 women between 25 and 75 years old randomly were distributed into three groups. Participants from group 3 only received the diet and no capsules. Follow-up 30 days

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Weight (Kilogram) of Volunteers at the Beginning (Day 1) and at the End of the Study (Day 30)
Time Frame: Days 1 and 30
In this table the investigators present the weight (kilogram) of the three intervented groups. Data are mean ± sem.
Days 1 and 30

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Height (Metre) of Volunteers at the Beginning (Day 1) and at the End of the Study (Day 30).
Time Frame: Days 1 and 30
In this table the investigators present the height of the three intervented groups. Data are mean ± sem.
Days 1 and 30
Body Mass Index (BMI) (Kg/m2) of Volunteers at the Beginning (Day 1) and at the End of the Study (Day 30).
Time Frame: Days 1 and 30
In this table the investigators present the Body Mass Index of the three intervented groups. Data are mean ± sem.
Days 1 and 30
Hip/Waist Ratio of Volunteers at the Beginning (Day 1) and at the End of the Study (Day 30)
Time Frame: Days 1 and 30
In this table the investigators present the hip/waist ratio of the three intervented groups. Data are mean ± sem.
Days 1 and 30
Systolic Pressure (mmHg) of Volunteers at the Beginning (Day 1) and at the End of the Study (Day 30).
Time Frame: Days 1 and 30
In this table the investigators present the systolic pressure of the three intervented groups. Data are mean ± sem.
Days 1 and 30
Diastolic Pressure (mmHg) of Volunteers at the Beginning (Day 1) and at the End of the Study (Day 30).
Time Frame: Days 1 and 30
In this table the investigators present the diastolic pressure of the three intervented groups. Data are mean ± sem.
Days 1 and 30
Glucose (mg/dL) of Volunteers at the Beginning (Day 1) and at the End of the Study (Day 30).
Time Frame: Days 1 and 30
In this table the investigators present the glucose of the three intervented groups. Data are mean ± sem.
Days 1 and 30
Cholesterol (mg/dL) of Volunteers at the Beginning (Day 1) and at the End of the Study (Day 30).
Time Frame: Days 1 and 30
In this table the investigators present the cholesterol of the three intervented groups. Data are mean ± sem.
Days 1 and 30
Triglycerides (TGs) (mg/dL) of Volunteers at the Beginning (Day 1) and at the End of the Study (Day 30).
Time Frame: Days 1 and 30
In this table the investigators present the Triglycerides (TGs) of the three intervented groups. Data are mean ± sem.
Days 1 and 30
Glutamic Pyruvic Transaminase (GPT) (U/L) of Volunteers at the Beginning (Day 1) and at the End of the Study (Day 30).
Time Frame: Days 1 and 30
In this table the investigators present the Glutamic Pyruvic Transaminase (GPT) of the three intervented groups. Data are mean ± sem.
Days 1 and 30

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Universidad Miguel Hernandez de Elche

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Instituto de Salud Carlos III
University of Alicante

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Elena García, PDI, Universidad Miguel Hernandez de Elche

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 19, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 25, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 27, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 3, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 12, 2015

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Elena García-García
  • Enrique Roche Collado (Other Grant/Funding Number: Instituto de Salud Carlos III-FEDER PS09/01093)
  • Vicente Micol Molina (Other Grant/Funding Number: PROMETEO/2012/007 from Generalitat Valenciana)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Overweight

Clinical Trials on Less oxidized oil and diet

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings