Positive Psychology to Improve Cardiac Health Behaviors (PEACE)

September 15, 2014 updated by: Jeff C. Huffman, MD, Massachusetts General Hospital

Developing a Positive Psychology Intervention to Improve Cardiac Health Behaviors: Qualitative Research Phase

The purpose of the study is to understand peoples' positive emotions, like how optimistic or grateful they feel, after they have had a heart problem. The investigators want to determine whether positive emotions affect peoples' ability to follow recommendations, like following a healthy diet, exercising, and taking medication.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The investigators aim to develop a novel positive psychology intervention that is adapted for patients hospitalized for an acute coronary syndrome (ACS). A treatment cultivating positive emotions in this vulnerable population could provide broad and significant health benefits, and may have distinct-and more powerful-effects than simply attempting to dampen negative emotions.

In this study, the investigators will use mixed methods (qualitative and quantitative) to take the first step towards developing such a treatment, with a major focus on the qualitative aspects of the patient assessments/interviews.

In this project, the investigators hope to do the following:

  1. Identify, through qualitative research, deficits in positive emotional and cognitive states prior to, during, and after cardiac admission: What positive emotions are lacking in hospitalized ACS patients?
  2. Explore strategies to enhance positive emotional and cognitive states in ACS patients.
  3. Identify links between these positive states and health behavior (diet, physical activity, and medication).
  4. Identify other barriers to compliance with health behaviors. What other factors adversely influence compliance with health behaviors in this population?
  5. Use quantitative measures of positive affect to ensure that the investigators are adequately capturing information about optimism and other positive states
  6. Develop a preliminary positive psychology-based intervention using the above information
  7. Explore the feasibility of using methods to objectively measure aspirin adherence and physical activity in this population.

To accomplish these goals, the investigators will interview 30 ACS patients during admission to the inpatient cardiac unit and 12 weeks after discharge. The investigators will identify 15 patients who demonstrate suboptimal adherence as reported by the Medical Outcomes Study Specific Adherence Scale (MOS-SAS) and 15 patients who demonstrate good adherence to health-related behaviors.

For these interviews, the investigators will first ask about positive emotional states that patients have experienced. the investigators will then inquire about potential ideas for increasing these positive emotional states by asking patients what has worked for them in the past and what they have noticed seems to work for others. The investigators will also describe some positive psychology exercises to the patients and ask whether they think those exercises would be effective at increasing positive emotional states. Next, the investigators will ask about health behaviors in which the patient has engaged. The investigators will explore the relationship between these behaviors and positive emotional states. Finally, the investigators will explore with patients some barriers to completing health behaviors and solicit suggestions for overcoming or mitigating these barriers.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
30

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
        • Massachusetts General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Admission to Massachusetts General Hospital cardiac floors (Ellison 9, 10, 11)
  • Age 18 or older
  • Admitted with myocardial infarction or unstable angina
  • Score of less than 15 --OR-- greater than or equal to 15 on the adherence scale
  • Ability to read and write in English

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cognitive deficits as assessed by a 6-item screen
  • Medical conditions that prevent interviewing or are likely to lead to death within 6 months

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Other: Optimal adherence

Participants receive the qualitative interview and adherence intervention.

This arm includes participants with scores of greater than or equal to 15 on the Medical Outcomes Study Specific Adherence Scale. This scale ranges from a score of 3 (extremely low adherence to health behaviors) to a score of 18 (extremely high adherence to health behaviors). A score of greater than or equal to 15 suggests optimal adherence to health behaviors.
Other: Qualitative Interview and Adherence
All participants receive the same intervention. The intervention involves two qualitative interviews per participant. The first interview occurs in the hospital, and the second interview occurs at 12 weeks. Participants also receive a pill bottle that tracks when they take their aspirin. They will also receive a step counter to use for two weeks at the end of the study.
Other: Sub-optimal adherence

Participants receive the qualitative interview and adherence intervention.

This arm includes participants with scores of less than 15 on the Medical Outcomes Study Specific Adherence Scale. This scale ranges from a score of 3 (extremely low adherence to health behaviors) to a score of 18 (extremely high adherence to health behaviors). A score of less than 15 suggests sub-optimal adherence to health behaviors.
Other: Qualitative Interview and Adherence
All participants receive the same intervention. The intervention involves two qualitative interviews per participant. The first interview occurs in the hospital, and the second interview occurs at 12 weeks. Participants also receive a pill bottle that tracks when they take their aspirin. They will also receive a step counter to use for two weeks at the end of the study.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Deficits in positive affect
Time Frame: 12 weeks

Qualitative data:

The investigators will extract information from 2 quantitative interviews to learn about participants' deficits in positive affect.

Quantitative data:

Life Orientation Test-Revised, Positive And Negative Affect Scale, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.
12 weeks
Barriers to health behaviors
Time Frame: 12 weeks

Qualitative data:

The investigators will extract information from 2 qualitative interviews to learn about participants' barriers to completing health behaviors.

Quantitative data:

Participants will receive a pill bottle that tracks when they take their aspirin. Participants will also receive a step counter to wear for two weeks.
12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in positive affect
Time Frame: Change from baseline positive affect at 12 weeks

Qualitative data:

The investigators will compare information from the 2 qualitative interviews to learn about participants' changes in positive affect.
Change from baseline positive affect at 12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Massachusetts General Hospital

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 4, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 6, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 8, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 16, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 15, 2014

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2011P002729
  • 1R01HL113272-01A1 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Coronary Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Qualitative Interview and Adherence

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings