Positive Psychology to Improve Cardiac Health Behaviors (PEACE)

September 15, 2014 updated by: Jeff C. Huffman, MD, Massachusetts General Hospital

Developing a Positive Psychology Intervention to Improve Cardiac Health Behaviors: Qualitative Research Phase

The purpose of the study is to understand peoples' positive emotions, like how optimistic or grateful they feel, after they have had a heart problem. The investigators want to determine whether positive emotions affect peoples' ability to follow recommendations, like following a healthy diet, exercising, and taking medication.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The investigators aim to develop a novel positive psychology intervention that is adapted for patients hospitalized for an acute coronary syndrome (ACS). A treatment cultivating positive emotions in this vulnerable population could provide broad and significant health benefits, and may have distinct-and more powerful-effects than simply attempting to dampen negative emotions.

In this study, the investigators will use mixed methods (qualitative and quantitative) to take the first step towards developing such a treatment, with a major focus on the qualitative aspects of the patient assessments/interviews.

In this project, the investigators hope to do the following:

  1. Identify, through qualitative research, deficits in positive emotional and cognitive states prior to, during, and after cardiac admission: What positive emotions are lacking in hospitalized ACS patients?
  2. Explore strategies to enhance positive emotional and cognitive states in ACS patients.
  3. Identify links between these positive states and health behavior (diet, physical activity, and medication).
  4. Identify other barriers to compliance with health behaviors. What other factors adversely influence compliance with health behaviors in this population?
  5. Use quantitative measures of positive affect to ensure that the investigators are adequately capturing information about optimism and other positive states
  6. Develop a preliminary positive psychology-based intervention using the above information
  7. Explore the feasibility of using methods to objectively measure aspirin adherence and physical activity in this population.

To accomplish these goals, the investigators will interview 30 ACS patients during admission to the inpatient cardiac unit and 12 weeks after discharge. The investigators will identify 15 patients who demonstrate suboptimal adherence as reported by the Medical Outcomes Study Specific Adherence Scale (MOS-SAS) and 15 patients who demonstrate good adherence to health-related behaviors.

For these interviews, the investigators will first ask about positive emotional states that patients have experienced. the investigators will then inquire about potential ideas for increasing these positive emotional states by asking patients what has worked for them in the past and what they have noticed seems to work for others. The investigators will also describe some positive psychology exercises to the patients and ask whether they think those exercises would be effective at increasing positive emotional states. Next, the investigators will ask about health behaviors in which the patient has engaged. The investigators will explore the relationship between these behaviors and positive emotional states. Finally, the investigators will explore with patients some barriers to completing health behaviors and solicit suggestions for overcoming or mitigating these barriers.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
        • Massachusetts General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Admission to Massachusetts General Hospital cardiac floors (Ellison 9, 10, 11)
  • Age 18 or older
  • Admitted with myocardial infarction or unstable angina
  • Score of less than 15 --OR-- greater than or equal to 15 on the adherence scale
  • Ability to read and write in English

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cognitive deficits as assessed by a 6-item screen
  • Medical conditions that prevent interviewing or are likely to lead to death within 6 months

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Optimal adherence

Participants receive the qualitative interview and adherence intervention.

This arm includes participants with scores of greater than or equal to 15 on the Medical Outcomes Study Specific Adherence Scale. This scale ranges from a score of 3 (extremely low adherence to health behaviors) to a score of 18 (extremely high adherence to health behaviors). A score of greater than or equal to 15 suggests optimal adherence to health behaviors.

All participants receive the same intervention. The intervention involves two qualitative interviews per participant. The first interview occurs in the hospital, and the second interview occurs at 12 weeks. Participants also receive a pill bottle that tracks when they take their aspirin. They will also receive a step counter to use for two weeks at the end of the study.
Other: Sub-optimal adherence

Participants receive the qualitative interview and adherence intervention.

This arm includes participants with scores of less than 15 on the Medical Outcomes Study Specific Adherence Scale. This scale ranges from a score of 3 (extremely low adherence to health behaviors) to a score of 18 (extremely high adherence to health behaviors). A score of less than 15 suggests sub-optimal adherence to health behaviors.

All participants receive the same intervention. The intervention involves two qualitative interviews per participant. The first interview occurs in the hospital, and the second interview occurs at 12 weeks. Participants also receive a pill bottle that tracks when they take their aspirin. They will also receive a step counter to use for two weeks at the end of the study.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Deficits in positive affect
Time Frame: 12 weeks

Qualitative data:

The investigators will extract information from 2 quantitative interviews to learn about participants' deficits in positive affect.

Quantitative data:

Life Orientation Test-Revised, Positive And Negative Affect Scale, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.

12 weeks
Barriers to health behaviors
Time Frame: 12 weeks

Qualitative data:

The investigators will extract information from 2 qualitative interviews to learn about participants' barriers to completing health behaviors.

Quantitative data:

Participants will receive a pill bottle that tracks when they take their aspirin. Participants will also receive a step counter to wear for two weeks.

12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in positive affect
Time Frame: Change from baseline positive affect at 12 weeks

Qualitative data:

The investigators will compare information from the 2 qualitative interviews to learn about participants' changes in positive affect.

Change from baseline positive affect at 12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 4, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 6, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

March 8, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

September 16, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 15, 2014

Last Verified

September 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2011P002729
  • 1R01HL113272-01A1 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Coronary Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Qualitative Interview and Adherence

3
Subscribe