Perceval S Aortic Heart Valve Study- North America
Clinical Investigation of the Perceval S Sutureless Heart Valve
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Alabama
-
Opelika, Alabama, United States, 36801
- East Alabama Medical Center
-
-
Arizona
-
Tucson, Arizona, United States, 85724
- University of Arizona
-
-
Colorado
-
Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80045
- University of Colorado Denver
-
-
Florida
-
Jacksonville, Florida, United States, 32204
- St. Vincent's Medical Center
-
Miami, Florida, United States, 33176
- Baptist Cardiac and Vascular Institute
-
-
Georgia
-
Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30308
- Emory University
-
-
Indiana
-
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46290
- St. Vincent Heart Center of Indiana
-
-
Maine
-
Portland, Maine, United States, 04102
- Maine Medical Center
-
-
Maryland
-
Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21201
- University of Maryland
-
-
Michigan
-
Dearborn, Michigan, United States, 48124
- Oakwood Hospital
-
-
Minnesota
-
Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905
- Mayo Clinic
-
-
New York
-
New York, New York, United States, 10065
- New York Presbyterian - Weill Cornell Medical Center
-
New York, New York, United States, 10467
- Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine
-
New York, New York, United States, 11075
- Lenox Hill/NS-LIJ
-
-
Ohio
-
Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44195
- Cleveland Clinic
-
Toledo, Ohio, United States, 43606
- ProMedica Toledo Hospital
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104
- University of Pennsylvania
-
-
Texas
-
Austin, Texas, United States, 78756
- Cardiothoracic and Vascluar Surgeons
-
-
Virginia
-
Charlottesville, Virginia, United States, 22908
- University of Virginia
-
Falls Church, Virginia, United States, 22042
- Inova Heart and Vascular Institute
-
-
Washington
-
Seattle, Washington, United States, 98195
- University of Washington
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion criteria:
- Subjects of age >= 18 years.
- Subjects with aortic valve stenosis or steno-insufficiency.
- The subject is willing to sign the informed consent.
- The subject in which preoperative evaluation indicated the need for native or prosthetic aortic valve replacement.
- The subject is located in a geographic location that will enable the subject to return to the study site for all follow-up examinations (i.e. geographically stable).
- Subject will be available to the investigator(s) for postoperative follow-up beyond one year.
Exclusion criteria:
- The subject has preexisting valve prosthesis or annuloplasty ring in the mitral, pulmonic or tricuspid position.
- The subject requires a double or multiple valve replacement or repair of the mitral, tricuspid, or pulmonic valve.
- The subject has a previously implanted PERCEVAL valve that requires replacement.
- Subjects requiring simultaneous cardiac procedures, apart from septal myectomy and/or coronary by-pass.
- The subject has active endocarditis.
- Subjects with active myocarditis
- The subject is or will be participating in a concomitant research study of an investigational product.
- Subjects with aneurysmal dilation or dissection of the ascending aortic wall.
- The subject is a minor, drug abuser, alcohol abuser, prison inmate, institutionalized, or is unable to give informed consent.
- The subject has a major or progressive non-cardiac disease that, in the investigator's experience, results in a life expectancy of less than 1 year, or the implant of the device produces an unacceptable increased risk to the patient.
- Subjects with known hypersensitivity to nickel alloys.
- The subject is undergoing renal dialysis for chronic renal failure or has hyperparathyroidism.
- The subject has had an acute preoperative neurological deficit, myocardial infarction, or cardiac event that has not returned to baseline or stabilized ≥30 days prior to the planned valve implant surgery.
- Subject is known to be noncompliant or is unlikely to complete the study.
- Subjects with an aortic root enlargement, where the ratio between the diameter of the sino-tubular junction and the annulus diameter, assessed by TTE, is > 1.3.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Perceval S Aortic Heart Valve
Treatment with the Perceval S Aortic Heart Valve
|
Perceval S Sutureless Aortic Heart Valve
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Primary Safety Endpoint
Time Frame: One-year
|
To demonstrate that the complication and survival rates for the PERCEVAL S valve are comparable to appropriate historical controls manifested as objective performance criteria (OPCs) and to that reported for other stented bioprostheses in the literature
|
One-year
|
|
Primary Efficacy Endpoint
Time Frame: One-year
|
To demonstrate that the rate of valve success for the PERCEVAL S valve is comparable to that of appropriate historical controls
|
One-year
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Secondary Efficacy Outcomes
Time Frame: One-year
|
To demonstrate that the hemodynamic performance of the PERCEVAL S valve is comparable to that reported in the literature for other stented aortic bioprostheses
|
One-year
|
|
Secondary Efficacy Outcomes
Time Frame: One-year
|
To demonstrate clinically significant improvements in overall patient condition by comparison of preoperative and postoperative NYHA functional classifications
|
One-year
|
|
Secondary Efficacy Outcomes
Time Frame: One-year
|
To demonstrate that the rate of device technical success for the PERCEVAL S valve is comparable to that of appropriate historical controls
|
One-year
|
Other Outcome Measures
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Supplementary Analyses
Time Frame: Discharge
|
Rates of cross-clamp time, cardiopulmonary bypass time, length of stay in ICU, length of hospital, and quality of life
|
Discharge
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Rakesh Suri, MD, DPhil, The Cleveland Clinic
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- G120053
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.