TDF Long Term Study

July 15, 2020 updated by: The HIV Netherlands Australia Thailand Research Collaboration

Efficacy and Safety Evaluation of TDF-based Regimen in Thai HIV-infected Children

This study will assess the safety and efficacy of generic TDF from Governmental Pharmaceutical Organization (GPO) in HIV-infected children

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

TDF is a nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) which can be taken only once per day and continues to have good efficacy even in patients who have resistance to other NNRTI in the absence of K65R mutation. TDF is a choice for patients with NRTI resistance, or those that require once-daily regimen to improve adherence. Currently, TDF has not been approved by the US FDA for children less than 18 years, but pediatricians has been using TDF in children who have treatment failure because of limitation of a more appropriate pediatric ARV. The Thai national guideline for pediatric 2009 recommend the use of TDF in children who have failed the first line therapy with multi-NRTI mutation and are more than 30 kilograms or have tanner stage 4 or more. However, the problem is that there is no pediatric TDF formulation. The available preparation of 300 mg tear drop tablet, if cut in half, may increase dosing errors, more or less by 18-37%. This will affect the blood level and/or toxicities. Therefore, the Thai Governmental Pharmaceutical Organization (GPO) has produced a generic TDF formulation that can be used in HIV-infected children. This study will assess the safety and efficacy information in children using this generic pediatric TDF formulation.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
36

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Thailand
      • Bangkok, Thailand, 10330
        • HIV-NAT
      • Bangkok, Thailand, 10330
        • King Chulalongkorn Hospital, Chulalongkorn University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

8 years to 18 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

HIV-infected children who are currently taking or are changing to tenofovir-(TDF) based regimen

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • children who are changing to TDF due to adherence problem or treatment failure
  • children who are already on TDF due to their clinical indication

Exclusion Criteria:

  • child/caretaker refuse to participate in this study
  • cannot adhere to the study schedule

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
tenofovir (TDF)
HIV-infected children who are currently on TDF-based regimen or are changing to TDF based on their clinical indication
Drug: tenofovir (TDF)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
viral load
Time Frame: week 48 and 96
Number of patients who have viral load less than 50 copies/ml at week 48 and week 96
week 48 and 96

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
renal status
Time Frame: weeks 24, 48, 72, and 96
Number of patients with renal toxicity assessed by GFR and with proximal tubular effect
weeks 24, 48, 72, and 96
adherence
Time Frame: every 3 months
Agreement between self reported adherence by visual analogue scale (VAS) pill count and TDM Sensitivity and specificity of self-reported adherence and pill count against gold standards of TDM and undetectable viral load
every 3 months
resistance
Time Frame: every 3 months
Resistant mutations in patients who fail TDF-based regimen and response to new regimen
every 3 months
adverse events
Time Frame: weeks 24, 48, 72, and 96
Proportion of patients who develop adverse events which are related to TDF and other ARVs
weeks 24, 48, 72, and 96

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
The HIV Netherlands Australia Thailand Research Collaboration

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Chulalongkorn University
Bamrasnaradura Infectious Diseases Institute

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Wasana Prasitsuebsai, MD, The HIV Netherlands Australia Thailand Research Collaboration
  • Principal Investigator: Jurai Wongsawat, MD, Bamrasnadura Institute

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

  • Prasitsuebsai W, Puthanakit T, Apornpong T, Keadpudsa S, Bunupuradah T, Chuanjaroen T, Thammajaruk N, Jupimai T, Kerr SJ, Ananworanich J. Bone and Renal Safety at 96 weeks of TDF-containing in HIV-infected Thai children. Abstract # 905 presented at the 21st CROI 2014, March 3-6, 2014 at Boston, USA

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 7, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 20, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 21, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 17, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 15, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • HIV-NAT 133

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings