Effects of Brain Stimulation During a Daytime Nap on Memory Consolidation in Older Adults
Impact of Transcranial Slow Oscillating Stimulation on Memory Consolidation During Slow Wave Sleep in Older Adults
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Berlin, Germany, 10117
- Charite CCM Neurologie Berlin
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- age: 50-90 years
- right handed
- inobtrusive neuropsychological examination
Exclusion Criteria:
- untreated severe internal or psychiatric diseases
- epilepsy
- other severe neurological diseases eg., previous major stroke, brain tumour
- dementia
- contraindications to MRI
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: 0,75 Hz stimulation
transcranial slow oscilliating stimulation (tSOS)during periods of SWS
|
Other Names:
|
|
Sham Comparator: no stimulation
Sham stimulation during periods of SWS
|
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Retention of declarative memories after 0.75 Hz stimulation during SWS, vs after sham stimulation during SWS
Time Frame: 4 weeks
|
Retention between stimulation conditions (0.75 Hz during SWS, vs sham stimulation during SWS) in the declarative memory task.
|
4 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
1. Amount of Slow wave Sleep
Time Frame: 4 weeks
|
1. Amount of slow wave sleep assessed by standard polysomnographic criteria in 0,75 Hz vs SHAM stimulation during SWS.
|
4 weeks
|
|
2. sleep spindels
Time Frame: 4 weeks
|
2.Spindel activity during sleep indicated via several spindel parameters like number, duration, frequency of spindles; compared between 0,75 Hz and SHAM stimulation during SWS.
|
4 weeks
|
|
3. EEG-correlates
Time Frame: 4 weeks
|
3. Neuronal correlates (EEG-power in slow oscillation frequency bands induced by 0,75 Hz vs SHAM stimulation during SWS; EEG-correlates of encoding and retrieval of a declarative memory task).
|
4 weeks
|
|
4. further memory systems
Time Frame: 4 weeks
|
4. Performance in further memory systems (procedural), compared between 0,75 Hz and SHAM stimulation during SWS.
|
4 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Marshall L, Helgadottir H, Molle M, Born J. Boosting slow oscillations during sleep potentiates memory. Nature. 2006 Nov 30;444(7119):610-3. doi: 10.1038/nature05278. Epub 2006 Nov 5.
- Diekelmann S, Born J. The memory function of sleep. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2010 Feb;11(2):114-26. doi: 10.1038/nrn2762. Epub 2010 Jan 4.
- Ferrucci R, Mameli F, Guidi I, Mrakic-Sposta S, Vergari M, Marceglia S, Cogiamanian F, Barbieri S, Scarpini E, Priori A. Transcranial direct current stimulation improves recognition memory in Alzheimer disease. Neurology. 2008 Aug 12;71(7):493-8. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000317060.43722.a3. Epub 2008 Jun 4.
- Naismith SL, Lewis SJ, Rogers NL. Sleep-wake changes and cognition in neurodegenerative disease. Prog Brain Res. 2011;190:21-52. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-53817-8.00002-5.
- Mednick SC, Cai DJ, Kanady J, Drummond SP. Comparing the benefits of caffeine, naps and placebo on verbal, motor and perceptual memory. Behav Brain Res. 2008 Nov 3;193(1):79-86. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2008.04.028. Epub 2008 May 8.
- Mander BA, Santhanam S, Saletin JM, Walker MP. Wake deterioration and sleep restoration of human learning. Curr Biol. 2011 Mar 8;21(5):R183-4. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.01.019. No abstract available.
- Mednick S, Nakayama K, Stickgold R. Sleep-dependent learning: a nap is as good as a night. Nat Neurosci. 2003 Jul;6(7):697-8. doi: 10.1038/nn1078.
- Ladenbauer J, Kulzow N, Passmann S, Antonenko D, Grittner U, Tamm S, Floel A. Brain stimulation during an afternoon nap boosts slow oscillatory activity and memory consolidation in older adults. Neuroimage. 2016 Nov 15;142:311-323. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.06.057. Epub 2016 Jul 2.
- Ladenbauer J, Ladenbauer J, Kulzow N, Floel A. Memory-relevant nap sleep physiology in healthy and pathological aging. Sleep. 2021 Jul 9;44(7):zsab002. doi: 10.1093/sleep/zsab002.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- Nap-tSOS-aged
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.