Effects of Brain Stimulation During a Daytime Nap on Memory Consolidation in Older Adults

January 29, 2018 updated by: Agnes Flöel, Charite University, Berlin, Germany

Impact of Transcranial Slow Oscillating Stimulation on Memory Consolidation During Slow Wave Sleep in Older Adults

The beneficial effect of nocturnal as well as daytime sleep on memory consolidation is well-documented in young, healthy subjects. Slow wave sleep (SWS), in particular, with its slow oscillating activity have shown to enhance declarative, hippocampus-dependent memory representations. This impact of sleep on memory performance can be additionally enhanced by exogeneous induction of transcranial slow oscillating stimulation (tSOS) within the frequency range of SWS in humans (0,7- 0,8 Hz) during sleep, as has been demonstrated in young, healthy subjects. If older adults that commonly experiencing cognitive decline, including long-term retention of declarative memory - benefit from transcranial slow oscillatory stimulation (tSOS) during sleep in the same way has not been studied so far. The primary goal of the study is therefore to investigate the impact of oscillating current stimulation (tSOS) during a daytime nap on declarative memory consolidation in older adults.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

18

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Berlin, Germany, 10117
        • Charite CCM Neurologie Berlin

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age: 50-90 years
  • right handed
  • inobtrusive neuropsychological examination

Exclusion Criteria:

  • untreated severe internal or psychiatric diseases
  • epilepsy
  • other severe neurological diseases eg., previous major stroke, brain tumour
  • dementia
  • contraindications to MRI

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 0,75 Hz stimulation
transcranial slow oscilliating stimulation (tSOS)during periods of SWS
Other Names:
  • oscillating direct current brain stimulation
Sham Comparator: no stimulation
Sham stimulation during periods of SWS
Other Names:
  • no stimulation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Retention of declarative memories after 0.75 Hz stimulation during SWS, vs after sham stimulation during SWS
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Retention between stimulation conditions (0.75 Hz during SWS, vs sham stimulation during SWS) in the declarative memory task.
4 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
1. Amount of Slow wave Sleep
Time Frame: 4 weeks
1. Amount of slow wave sleep assessed by standard polysomnographic criteria in 0,75 Hz vs SHAM stimulation during SWS.
4 weeks
2. sleep spindels
Time Frame: 4 weeks
2.Spindel activity during sleep indicated via several spindel parameters like number, duration, frequency of spindles; compared between 0,75 Hz and SHAM stimulation during SWS.
4 weeks
3. EEG-correlates
Time Frame: 4 weeks
3. Neuronal correlates (EEG-power in slow oscillation frequency bands induced by 0,75 Hz vs SHAM stimulation during SWS; EEG-correlates of encoding and retrieval of a declarative memory task).
4 weeks
4. further memory systems
Time Frame: 4 weeks
4. Performance in further memory systems (procedural), compared between 0,75 Hz and SHAM stimulation during SWS.
4 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 18, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 25, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

April 26, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 30, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 29, 2018

Last Verified

January 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Older Adults (50-90 Years)

Clinical Trials on brain stimulation

Subscribe