Safety and Efficacy of Tauroursodeoxycholic Acid Versus Ursofalk in the Treatment of Adult Primary Biliary Cirrhosis

May 16, 2013 updated by: Jia Ji-Dong, Beijing Friendship Hospital

A Randomized, Double-blinded, Double-dummy, Parallel-controlled and Multicenter Clinical Trial to Investigate Safety and Efficacy of Tauroursodeoxycholic Acid Capsules in Treatment of Adult Primary Biliary Cirrhosis

Though ursodeoxycholate acid (UDCA) is the wellknown effective therapy for PBC, clinical effectiveness of UDCA may be limited by its poor absorption and extensive biotransformation. The more hydrophilic bile acid tauroursodeoxycholate (TUDCA) is the active ingredients of UDCA, and has been approved by state food and drug administration in China for treatment of cholesterol stones. So it is necessary to verify the efficacy and safety of TUDCA in the treatment of adult primary biliary cirrhosis. In this randomized, double-blinded, double-dummy, parallel-controlled and multicenter clinical trial, we detect the proportion of patients who had AKP decline more than 25% as the primary outcome; decline of AKP, total bilirubin, GGT, ALT and AST as secondary outcomes after patients were treated with TUDCA or UDCA for 24 weeks.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
216

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Beijing
      • Beijing, Beijing, China
        • Beijing Ditan Hospital
      • Beijing, Beijing, China
        • Beijing Youan Hospital
      • Beijing, Beijing, China
        • Chinese PLA General Hospital
      • Beijing, Beijing, China
        • Peking University People's Hospital
      • Beijing, Beijing, China
        • Beijing 302 Hospital
      • Beijing, Beijing, China
        • Beijing Friendship Hospital
      • Beijing, Beijing, China
        • Peiking University First Hosptial
    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
        • Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical University
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
        • First Affiliated Hospital,SunYat-Sen University
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
        • Third Affiliated Hospital,SunYat-Sen University
    • Hunan
      • Wuhan, Hunan, China
        • Tongji Hospital
    • Shanghai
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China
        • Shanghai Changzheng Hospital
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China
        • Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China
        • Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China
        • Renji Hospital
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China
        • 85 Military Hospital
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China
        • Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China
        • Huashan Hospital
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China
        • NO.3 People's Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China
        • Ruijin Hospital
    • Shanxi
      • Xian, Shanxi, China
        • Xijing Hospital
    • Sichuan
      • Chengdu, Sichuan, China
        • West China Hospital
    • Yunnan
      • Kunming, Yunnan, China
        • First Affiliated Hospital Of KunMing Medical College
    • Zhejiang
      • Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
        • The Sixth People's Hospital of Hangzhou
      • Zhejiang, Zhejiang, China
        • First affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 66 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • written informed consent
  • aged 18-70 years
  • increase in alkaline phosphatase for 2 folds or more
  • positive anti-mitochondrial antibody (AMA) with presence of antibodies against the pyruvate dehydrogenase complex (AMA-M2)；AMA-negative patients should be diagnosed as PBC with histologic evidence.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. patients who had been treated with UDCA, immunosuppressive medications within 3 months.
  2. patients who had evidence of extrahepatic biliary obstruction
  3. patients coinfection with HBV or HCV
  4. patients with one of the followings: 1) hemoglobin(HB): <11 g/dl in male, <10 g/dl in female 2) white blood cell count <3000/mm3 3) neutrophile granulocyte <1500/mm3 4) platelet <50000/mm3; 5) serum albumin <3.3 g/dl 6) alanine aminotransferase(ALT)≥10×ULN and/or aspartate aminotransferase(ALT)≥10×ULN; 7) ALT≥5×ULN and/or AST≥5×ULN coexisting with immunoglobulin G (IgG) ≥2×ULN; 8) total bilirubin ≥4×ULN; 9) prothrombin time (PT) prolong 3 seconds or more, or PTA ≦60%; 10) creatinine ≥4×ULN.
  5. patients with evidence of decompensated liver disease(ascites, gastrointestinal bleeding, hepatic encephalopathy et al.)
  6. definitely diagnosed as hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC), probable HCC, AFP>100ng/ml.Patients with AFP>2×ULN while <100ng/ml should re-test 2 weeks later.
  7. Body Mass Index >28 kg/m2
  8. drug or alcohol abuse.
  9. patient with severe disease of heart, lung, kidney, alimentary canal, neural system, autoimmune disease or tumor
  10. patient had or on the scheduled of organ transplantation;
  11. patient for whom the follow-up is considered impossible
  12. pregnant or nursing woman

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Group 1
Tauroursodeoxycholic Acid Capsules,250mg,tid.
Drug: Tauroursodeoxycholic Acid Capsules
250mg.tid.po
Other Names:
  • Taurolite
Active Comparator: Group 2
Ursodeoxycholate acid capsules, 250mg,tid,
Drug: Ursodeoxycholic Acid Capsules
250mg.tid.po
Other Names:
  • Ursofalk

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The proportion of patients who had AKP decline more than 25% after 24 weeks treatment of UDCA
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
ALP decline from baseline after 24 weeks treatment of TUDCA
Time Frame: 12 month
12 month
Total bilirubin decline from baseline after 24 weeks treatment of TUDCA
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
GGT decline from baseline after 24 weeks treatment of TUDCA
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
ALT and AST decline from baseline after 24 weeks treatment of TUDCA
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Beijing Friendship Hospital

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Beijing Trendful Kangjian Medical Information Consulting Limited Company

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Dong Ji Jia, Doctor, Beijing Friendship Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 16, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 16, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 20, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 20, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 16, 2013

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2009L05707 (SFDA)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings