Computerized Screening for Comorbidity in Adolescents With Substance or Psychiatric Disorders

January 22, 2020 updated by: Kenneth A. Kobak, Ph.D., Center for Psychological Consultation
The KSADS-COMP will facilitate identification of comorbid psychiatric and substance use diagnoses frequently missed in clinical practice, and improve adolescent treatment outcomes. The self-administered version of the KSADS-COMP can also be used cost-effectively in schools and juvenile justice settings where there is a growing interest in early identification and referral of youth in need of mental health services. The KSADS-Bridge assessment tool with its RDoC neurocognitive tasks, when completed with the self- or clinician administered KSADS-COMP, will help to create cross-talk between the DSM and RDoC diagnostic perspectives, and begin to generate a database on the relationship between RDoC constructs and treatment outcomes across a range of diagnostic categories.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Detailed Description

This Phase II SBIR grant is a follow-up to the Phase I SBIR grant "Computerized Screening for Comorbidity in Adolescents with Substance or Psychiatric Disorders." During Phase I, parent and adolescent self administered computerized versions of the psychiatric interview, the Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia (KSADS), were developed to assess DSM-IVR diagnoses in adolescents. Since the funding of the Phase I grant, there have been two significant developments in the field: the American Psychiatric Association's release of the DSM-5 manual, and NIMH's launch of the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) initiative that aims to create the necessary database to derive a new psychiatric nomenclature informed by neuroscience, genetics, and psychology. The primary goals of Phase II include: 1) Update the parent and adolescent self-administered computerized KSADS (KSADS-COMP) so it is compatible with DSM-5 criteria; 2) Develop software for a clinician-administered computerized KSADS (KSADS-COMP); 3) Create a KSADS- Bridge product that includes a battery of RDoC computerized neurocognitive tasks that can be completed with the self- or clinician-administered KSADS-COMP; and 4) Examine the criterion, convergent, and discriminant validity of the self-administered KSADS-COMP, and the relationship among DSM-5 diagnoses, dimensional measures of psychopathology, and performance on RDoC neurocognitive tasks. Ultimately the aim of this initiative is to create an instrument that, in addition to providing a reliable comprehensive assessment tool for psychiatric disorders in adolescents, can bridge DSM-5 and RDoC diagnostic perspectives. A sample of 400 adolescents and their parents will be recruited for this study: half will complete the self-administered KSADS-COMP; the other half will complete the clinician-administered KSADSCOMP. All 400 adolescents and their parents, in addition to completing one of the KSADS-COMP versions, will also complete a battery of dimensional symptom rating scales. A subset of 210 adolescents and their parents will then complete the other version of the KSADS-COMP to test diagnostic concordance between the self- and clinician-administered KSADS-COMP. To obtain reliable Kappa estimates, this subset will include 30 adolescents with no psychopathology and 30 adolescents that meet criteria for each of the following diagnoses: conduct disorder, major depression, bipolar; substance use disorders; post traumatic stress disorder; and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. This subset of 210 adolescents will also be administered the RDoC battery of neurocognitive computerized tasks. The KSADS-COMP and KSADS-Bridge assessment tools will have multiple clinical and research applications. In addition to helping identify comorbidity in teens with substance or psychiatric disorders, it will help to create the cross-talk needed between the DSM and RDoC diagnostic perspectives, and will help to improve clinical care in the short- and long-run as the field aims to transition to a new psychiatric nomenclature.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
223

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21205
        • Hugo W. Moser Research Institute at Kennedy Krieger
    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15213
        • University of Pittsburgh

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

11 years to 17 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

adolescents aged 13-18 seeking psychiatric treatment at a rural mental health clinic

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • adolescent between the ages of 11 and 17

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Children will be excluded if they have a diagnosis of mental retardation (IQ < 70) or a severe psychosis that would impair the child's ability to participate.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Wilcoxon rank sum tests.
Time Frame: within 2 days of criterion measure
compare scores on disorder-specific symptom rating scales between those with and without a specific diagnoses
within 2 days of criterion measure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Center for Psychological Consultation

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
University of Pittsburgh
Hugo W. Moser Research Institute at Kennedy Krieger, Inc.
Child Mind Institute

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 30, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 29, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 31, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 3, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 27, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 22, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 1R43MH094092 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings