Evaluation of Neointimal Coverage of EES and BMS After Implantation in STEMI Patients by Optical Coherence Tomography (NeoCover)
Evaluation of Neointimal Coverage of Everolimus-Eluting Stent and Bare-metal Stent After Implantation in STEMI Patients by Optical Coherence Tomography
Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) represents the preferred reperfusion strategy for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), since it is more effective than thrombolytic regimens in reducing adverse events, including death. Drug-eluting stents (DES) are currently being widely used in patients with STEMI. The effectiveness of DES to reduce restenosis and the need for revascularization compared with bare-metal stents (BMS) has been documented in randomized controlled trials. The first-generation DESs implanted in STEMI have been associated with delayed healing and incomplete strut coverage. Therefore, in patients with implanted DES, longer duration of dual antiplatelet therapy is needed. The second-generation DESs (ZES and EES) have been improved the drug and polymer, which have been proved to improve neointima healing compared with the first generation DESs.
However, the difference of strut coverage between EES and BMS implanted in STEMI patients is unknown. In this study, we assess the neointimal coverage at 3-month and 12-month follow-up in EES and BMS implanted in patients with STEMI by optical coherence tomography.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Heilongjiang
-
Harbin, Heilongjiang, China, 150081
- The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age: 18-75 years
- Acute MI with ST-segment elevation, within 12 hours from symptoms onset.
- Length of culprit lesion≤25mm.
- Vessel size in between 2.5 and 4.0 mm.
- Signed patient informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Prior administration of thrombolytic therapy.
- Cardiogenic shock.
- Renal failure (Crea≥2.0mg/dL).
- Recent major bleeding.
- Allergy to heparin, aspirin, clopidogrel, everolimus, the polymer components of the Xience V stent, stainless steel, or contrast media.
- Left main disease
- Multi-vessel lesion
- Other hemodynamically significant lesion(s) is present in the infarct vessel (or side branches)
- Angiography demonstrates the infarct lesion to be at the site of a previously implanted stent or in bypass grafts.
- No suitable anatomy for OCT scan.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: DES
Everolimus-Eluting Stent implanted in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)
|
|
|
Active Comparator: BMS
Bare-Metal Stent implanted in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Comparison of the rate of covered struts to the EES vs BMS implanted in STEMI patients by frequency domain optical coherence tomography (FD-OCT).
Time Frame: 3-month
|
The covered strut is defined as the strut has definite neointimal over it.
And the rate of covered struts was calculated as the number of covered struts divided the number of total struts.
|
3-month
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Comparison of the rate of covered struts to the EES vs BMS implanted in STEMI patients by FD-OCT.
Time Frame: 12-month
|
The covered strut is defined as the strut has definite neointimal over it.
And the rate of covered struts was calculated as the number of covered struts divided the number of total struts.
|
12-month
|
|
Comparison of the rate of malaposed struts to EES vs BMS implanted in STEMI patients by FD-OCT.
Time Frame: 3-month
|
Strut malapposition is defined as struts detached from the vessel wall > 108μm for EES and > 101μm for BMS.
The rate of malaposed struts is calculated as the number of malaposed struts divided the number of total struts.
|
3-month
|
|
Comparison of the rate of malaposed struts to the EES vs BMS implanted in STEMI patients by FD-OCT.
Time Frame: 12-month
|
Strut malapposition is defined as struts detached from the vessel wall > 108μm for EES and > 101μm for BMS.
The rate of malaposed struts is calculated as the number of malaposed struts divided the number of total struts.
|
12-month
|
|
Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE)
Time Frame: 12-month
|
12-month
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Bo Yu, MD,PhD, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimated)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- HMUOCT-STEMI
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Acute Myocardial Infarction
-
NCT07586865Not yet recruitingAcute Myocardial Infarction (AMI) | Acute Myocardial Infarction of Anterior Wall | Acute Myocardial Infarction With ST Elevation | Acute Myocardial Infarction With ST Segment Elevation | Acute Myocardial Infarction of Left Ventricle
-
NCT05800951Active, not recruitingAcute Myocardial Infarction | Cardiogenic Shock | STEMI | NSTEMI - Non-ST Segment Elevation MI | STEMI - ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction | NSTEMI | Acute Myocardial Infarction With ST Elevation | Acute Myocardial Infarction of Right Ventricle (Disorder) | Acute Myocardial Infarction of Left Ventricle
-
NCT07400458RecruitingAcute Myocardial Infarction
-
NCT07522164Active, not recruitingAcute Myocardial Infarction
-
NCT07181356Recruiting
-
NCT03486080CompletedAcute Myocardial Infarction | STEMI - ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction | Acute Myocardial Ischemia
-
NCT07443982Active, not recruitingAcute Myocardial Infarction (AMI)
-
NCT05992012TerminatedTriggers of Acute Myocardial Infarction | Time of Onset of Acute Myocardial Infarction | Long-term Prognosis After Acute Myocardial Infarction
-
NCT05535582CompletedCardiovascular Diseases | Acute Coronary Syndrome | Acute Myocardial Infarction | Metabolic Disturbance
-
NCT07409441Not yet recruitingMyocardial Infarction, Acute
Clinical Trials on Xience™ V stent (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, California, USA)
-
NCT05082532Not yet recruitingFemoropopliteal Occlusive Disease
-
NCT04904250Not yet recruitingStroke | Carotid Stenosis | Carotid Artery Stent
-
NCT01080872Completed
-
NCT01080859Completed
-
NCT01182649CompletedCoronary Artery Disease | Coronary Atherosclerosis
-
NCT01684982CompletedAcute Myocardial Infarction
-
NCT04885816TerminatedCoronary Artery Disease (CAD) | Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) | High Bleeding Risk