Acupuncture to Prevent Chemotherapy Dose Reduction Due to Chemotherapy-induced Peripheral Neuropathy in Breast and Colorectal Cancer Patients (GCC1232)

November 5, 2019 updated by: University of Maryland, Baltimore

Acupuncture to Prevent Chemotherapy Dose Reduction Due to Chemotherapy-induced Peripheral Neuropathy in Breast and Colorectal Cancer Patients

In this study the investigators will assess how useful and safe acupuncture is in easing the pain, tingling and numbness that is caused by chemotherapy. The researchers hope this will prevent the need to reduce the amount of chemotherapy a patient receives.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Terminated

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This is a single-center, pilot (phase IIb), randomized, standard care- and placebo (sham acupuncture)-controlled clinical trial (N=60) assessing the effects of acupuncture to prevent chemotherapy dose reduction due to chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) and to elucidate the mechanism of action. Breast or colorectal cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy containing neurotoxic agents (taxanes or oxaliplatin) at the University of Maryland Marlene & Stewart Greenebaum Cancer Center (UMGCC) will be screened for CIPN. Once these patients develop greater than or equal to National Cancer Institute-Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI-CTC) grade 2 CIPN, they will be recruited for this study. Severity of CIPN as defined by NCI-CTC is listed in Appendix A. Patients will be stratified based on cancer type (breast cancer vs colorectal cancer). The patients will then be randomly assigned to one of three arms: (A) real acupuncture, (B) sham acupuncture or (C) standard care. All patients will follow the same chemotherapy dose reduction algorithm (Appendix B). No concomitant anti-neuropathy medication is allowed. Patients in the intervention arms will be randomly assigned to undergo weekly real or sham acupuncture until the end of their chemotherapy. In these two arms, the patient, the patient's medical oncologist, pharmacist, research nurse, and study coordinator will be blinded to the treatment assignment. In standard care arm, patients will not receive additional therapy for CIPN. Their CIPN will be managed according to the standard chemotherapy dose reduction algorithm. In all arms, chemotherapy dose will be documented during the patient's scheduled chemotherapy sessions. The chemotherapy relative dose intensity (RDI) will be calculated at the end of their chemotherapy. Validated patient-reported outcome questionnaires: Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/ Gynecologic Oncology Group-Neurotoxicity (FACT/GOG-Ntx) questionnaire and Neuropathy Pain Scale (NPS), described later, will be used to assess CIPN severity weekly in all patients until the end of their chemotherapy and at the 4 week follow up. Nerve conduction study will be performed by a neurologist at baseline and after chemotherapy is finished. Side effects from real or sham acupuncture will be recorded weekly. Approximately 4 ml of blood will be drawn from patients before each real or sham acupuncture treatment, or with routine weekly blood work check (in the standard care arm), at the end of chemotherapy, and at the 4 week follow up to measure changes in nerve growth factor and other neurotrophic factors such as brain-derived neurotrophic factor, neurotrophin-3, the insulin-like growth factors, and vascular endothelial growth factor. They will be analyzed in the cytokine lab at the University of Maryland School of Medicine (UMSOM).

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
19

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21201
        • University of Maryland Marlene & Stewart Greenebaum Cancer Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Histologically proven stage I-III carcinoma of the breast OR histologically proven stage I-III colorectal carcinoma.
  • Receiving adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy that includes a taxane or oxaliplatin.
  • While on chemotherapy, develop greater than or equal to NCI-CTC grade 2 CIPN.
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-2.
  • The patient is aware of the nature of his/her diagnosis, understands the study regimen, its requirements, risks, and discomforts, and is able and willing to sign an informed consent form.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior acupuncture within one year of enrollment.
  • Known metastatic (stage IV) breast or colorectal cancer involvement.
  • Pre-existing peripheral neuropathy before chemotherapy is initiated
  • Currently taking anti-neuropathy medication such as gabapentin, or pregabalin.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: SUPPORTIVE_CARE
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
NO_INTERVENTION: Standard Care
Patients will be stratified based on cancer type (breast cancer vs colorectal cancer). In standard care arm, patients will not receive additional therapy for CIPN. Patient will complete a weekly questionnaire during the study to determine severity of nerve pain symptoms. Each week record the total amount of chemotherapy received in the past week. Record how much chemotherapy received all together. Each week patient will have blood drawn (about 1 teaspoon) to check nerve growth factors levels. All patients will follow the same chemotherapy dose reduction algorithm. No concomitant anti-neuropathy medication is allowed.
EXPERIMENTAL: Acupuncture
Patients will be stratified based on cancer type (breast cancer vs colorectal cancer). The patients will be randomly assigned to receive acupuncture until the end of their chemotherapy. Patient will complete a weekly questionnaire during the study to determine severity of nerve pain symptoms. Each week record the total amount of chemotherapy received in the past week. Record how much chemotherapy received all together. Each week patient will have blood drawn (about 1 teaspoon) to check nerve growth factors levels. All patients will follow the same chemotherapy dose reduction algorithm. No concomitant anti-neuropathy medication is allowed. In standard care arm, patients will not receive additional therapy for CIPN.
Device: Acupuncture using Seirin® needles

Participants will receive acupuncture weekly until the end of chemotherapy.

Subjects will receive acupuncture at documented acupoints. To improve blinding effect, the acupuncturist will also tap 2 guiding tubes at 2 sham points , and immediately affix a pair of needles to the surface of the same points with adhesive tape, without needle insertion.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Sham Acupuncture
Patients will be stratified based on cancer type (breast cancer vs colorectal cancer). The patients will be randomly assigned to receive sham acupuncture until the end of their chemotherapy while following the same chemotherapy dose reduction algorithm. No concomitant anti-neuropathy medication is allowed. Patient will complete a weekly questionnaire during the study to determine severity of nerve pain symptoms. Each week record the total amount of chemotherapy received in the past week. Record how much chemotherapy received all together. Each week patient will have blood drawn (about 1 teaspoon) to check nerve growth factors levels.
Device: Sham Acupuncture using Park Sham placebo acupuncture device

Participants will receive sham acupuncture until the end of chemotherapy.

Acupuncturist will insert Park Sham Devices, non-penetrating sham acupuncture device consisting of a retractable needle and an adhesive tube into the sham points, and then immediately apply 2 pieces of adhesive tape next to the needles. In addition, she will tap a mock plastic needle guiding tube on the surface of each of the 8 true points in the arm and leg to produce some discernible sensation and then immediately apply a needle with a piece of adhesive tape to the dermal surface, without needle insertion.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of Colorectal and Breast Cancer Patients in Each Arm Who Require Dose Reduction or Discontinuation Due to Chemotherapy-induced Peripheral Neuropathy.
Time Frame: Week 12
The main objective is to assess efficacy and safety of acupuncture using Seirin acupuncture needles in colorectal and breast cancer patients who developed chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy while receiving adjuvant/neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Safety will be assessed by recording side effects from acupuncture treatment. Efficacy will be assessed by measuring the proportion of patients in each arm who are required to undergo dose reduction or discontinuation due to chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy.
Week 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Maryland, Baltimore

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 1, 2013

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2014

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 13, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 17, 2013

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 20, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 7, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 5, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • HP-00053394
  • GCC1232 (OTHER: University of Maryland Greenebaum Cancer Center)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings