Study to Evaluate the Ability of Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis or Psoriatic Arthritis to Effectively Use a Reusable Autoinjector to Self-inject Etanercept
A Single-arm, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Ability of Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis or Psoriatic Arthritis to Effectively Use a Reusable Electromechanical Autoinjector to Self-inject Etanercept
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Alabama
-
Huntsville, Alabama, United States, 35801
- Research Site
-
-
Arizona
-
Peoria, Arizona, United States, 85381
- Research Site
-
Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85037
- Research Site
-
-
California
-
Santa Maria, California, United States, 93454-6945
- Research Site
-
Upland, California, United States, 91786
- Research Site
-
-
Colorado
-
Denver, Colorado, United States, 80230
- Research Site
-
-
Florida
-
Sarasota, Florida, United States, 34239
- Research Site
-
Tampa, Florida, United States, 33614
- Research Site
-
-
Kentucky
-
Paducah, Kentucky, United States, 42003
- Research Site
-
-
Nebraska
-
Lincoln, Nebraska, United States, 68516
- Research Site
-
-
New York
-
Orchard Park, New York, United States, 14127
- Research Site
-
-
Oklahoma
-
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States, 73103
- Research Site
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Duncansville, Pennsylvania, United States, 16635
- Research Site
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Subject has diagnosis of RA or PsA and indicated for treatment with etanercept per the current label, based on history.
- Subject is willing to self-inject per investigator judgement at screening.
- Subject has no known history of tuberculosis.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Latex allergy.
- Subject has any active infection (including chronic or localized infections) for which anti-infectives were indicated within 4 weeks prior to first study dose of etanercept.
- Subject had prosthetic joint infection within 5 years of screening or native joint infection within 1 year of screening.
- Other criteria may apply.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Etanercept / Autoinjector A
Participants self-injected 50 mg etanercept subcutaneously using autoinjector A at the study center on Day 1 and then once a week from Weeks 1 to 5 (total of 6 injections).
|
Autoinjector A, a hand-held, reusable electromechanical device, and a single-use, disposable cassette preassembled with an etanercept 50-mg liquid prefilled syringe (PFS).
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Successful Self-injections to Total Non-missed Injections
Time Frame: Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4 and Week 5
|
The successful self-injection of etanercept using the Autoinjector A, as evaluated by the percentage of successful injections of the total nonmissed injections administered by participants in the non-health care setting during Weeks 1 to 5. Successful self-injection was assessed by Question 1 in the Participant Self-injection Questionnaire, which was completed by each participant after each self-injection.
Successful injection is defined as the Autoinjector A signaling a complete injection and no liquid medication pooled on your skin.
|
Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4 and Week 5
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Autoinjector A System Failures
Time Frame: Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4 and Week 5
|
The autoinjector A and prefilled syringe (PFS)/cassettes used by the participants were examined at the end of the study by device engineers.
System failure was defined as the failure of the Autoinjector A or PFS/cassette to meet the device design requirements during Weeks 1 to 5. The percentage of system failures is reported out of the total number of injection attempts during the study, including multiple attempts per week.
|
Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4 and Week 5
|
|
Percentage of Errors in Each Step of the Self-injection Process
Time Frame: Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4 and Week 5
|
For all the nonmissed injections recorded on the Participant Self-injection Questionnaire, the percentage of the following steps in the self-injection process that were not successfully completed out of the total nonmissed injections during Weeks 1 to 5 are reported.
If multiple attempts were recorded, all the recorded attempts were considered, regardless whether it was a successful attempt or not.
• Error Icon lit up (Question 2) • Could not load cassette successfully (Question 3) • Could not remove purple cassette cap successfully (Question 4) • Could not press start button to begin self-injection successfully (Question 5).
|
Week 1, Week 2, Week 3, Week 4 and Week 5
|
Other Outcome Measures
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events and Adverse Device Events
Time Frame: 9 weeks
|
An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical trial participant that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with study treatment or the device under study.
The definition includes worsening of a pre-existing medical condition.
A serious adverse event is defined as an AE that meets at least 1 of the following serious criteria: • fatal • life threatening • requires or prolongs in-patient hospitalization • results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity • congenital anomaly/birth defect • other medically important serious event.
An adverse device effect is any adverse event related to the use of a medical device.
Adverse device effects include AEs resulting from insufficient or inadequate instructions for use, malfunction of the device, or from use errors (including errors resulting from normal use, reasonably forseeable misuse or from intentional misuse) of the device.
|
9 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
Helpful Links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Skin Diseases
- Immune System Diseases
- Autoimmune Diseases
- Joint Diseases
- Musculoskeletal Diseases
- Rheumatic Diseases
- Connective Tissue Diseases
- Skin Diseases, Papulosquamous
- Spinal Diseases
- Bone Diseases
- Spondylarthropathies
- Spondylarthritis
- Spondylitis
- Psoriasis
- Arthritis
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid
- Arthritis, Psoriatic
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Peripheral Nervous System Agents
- Analgesics
- Sensory System Agents
- Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal
- Analgesics, Non-Narcotic
- Anti-Inflammatory Agents
- Antirheumatic Agents
- Immunosuppressive Agents
- Immunologic Factors
- Gastrointestinal Agents
- Etanercept
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 20110107
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.