Pilot Study of IVUS Imaging During Endovascular Interventions of Failing Hemodialysis Access Grafts

February 19, 2015 updated by: Volcano Corporation
This pilot study will provide data to aid in the planning of a follow-up multi-center randomized, controlled trial (RCT). As such, the sample size for this pilot is not driven by formal statistical hypothesis testing. Rather, the sample size of 100 patients (50 per arm) was derived in consultation with the study PI and Co-PI who are experts in vascular surgery, and in particular, the field of hemodialysis access interventions. The results of this pilot study will provide the data that is necessary for generation of specific hypotheses that can then be formally tested in the follow-up RCT

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
100

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • South Carolina
      • Orangeburg, South Carolina, United States
        • Regional Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

ESRD PATIENTS WITH THROMBOSED AV GRAFTS

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient must be > 18 and < 85 years of age
  2. Patient or legally authorized representative must be willing to participate and able to understand, read, and sign the informed consent document before the planned procedure
  3. Eligible for de-clot procedure or evaluation of slow flow for a failing hemodialysis graft that previously provided access for at least 1 successful hemodialysis session

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient or legally authorized representative cannot or will not provide written informed consent
  2. Known metal allergy precluding endovascular stent implantation
  3. Known reaction or sensitivity to iodinated contrast that cannot be pretreated
  4. Patients who are pregnant or lactating
  5. Patients with scheduled kidney transplant within the next 6 months
  6. Patients scheduled to switch to peritoneal dialysis within the next 6 months
  7. Patients with life expectancy of less than 6 months
  8. Participation in any other clinical research study that would interfere with the patient's participation in this study
  9. Any concurrent disease or condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would make the patient unsuitable for participation in the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
CONTROL GROUP
Control group: index intervention guided by DSA; IVUS post-intervention only (50 patients)
TEST GROUP
Test group: index intervention guided by IVUS + DSA (50 patients

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Re-Intervention Control vs. Test
Time Frame: 6 months
Difference in time (measured in days) to AV graft failure after index intervention guided by DSA in the absence (control group) or presence of IVUS guidance (test group), assessed through 6 months post-index procedure
6 months
Define IVUS workflow
Time Frame: Day 0
Define IVUS workflow for AV graft evaluation during interventions for access site failure
Day 0
Evaluate ability of IVUS in AV Grafts
Time Frame: Day 0
Evaluate the ability of IVUS to identify targets for therapy in poorly functioning AV grafts that are not identified by DSA
Day 0

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
IVUS vs DSA alone- Decision making
Time Frame: Day 0
Percentage of time IVUS changes decision making during the index procedure (test group)
Day 0
% patients requiring re-intervention
Time Frame: 3 months and 6 months
Percentage of patients with graft failure or need for reintervention at 3 months and 6 months (c0ntrol and test)
3 months and 6 months
Assess CHROMOFLO in AV grafts
Time Frame: Day 0
Assess the ability of ChromaFlo® to identify residual thrombus in the hemodialysis access circuit
Day 0

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Volcano Corporation

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: John Ross, MD, Regional Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 22, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 22, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 27, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 20, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 19, 2015

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Ross Pilot

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings