Pilot Study of IVUS Imaging During Endovascular Interventions of Failing Hemodialysis Access Grafts

February 19, 2015 updated by: Volcano Corporation
This pilot study will provide data to aid in the planning of a follow-up multi-center randomized, controlled trial (RCT). As such, the sample size for this pilot is not driven by formal statistical hypothesis testing. Rather, the sample size of 100 patients (50 per arm) was derived in consultation with the study PI and Co-PI who are experts in vascular surgery, and in particular, the field of hemodialysis access interventions. The results of this pilot study will provide the data that is necessary for generation of specific hypotheses that can then be formally tested in the follow-up RCT

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • South Carolina
      • Orangeburg, South Carolina, United States
        • Regional Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

ESRD PATIENTS WITH THROMBOSED AV GRAFTS

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient must be > 18 and < 85 years of age
  2. Patient or legally authorized representative must be willing to participate and able to understand, read, and sign the informed consent document before the planned procedure
  3. Eligible for de-clot procedure or evaluation of slow flow for a failing hemodialysis graft that previously provided access for at least 1 successful hemodialysis session

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient or legally authorized representative cannot or will not provide written informed consent
  2. Known metal allergy precluding endovascular stent implantation
  3. Known reaction or sensitivity to iodinated contrast that cannot be pretreated
  4. Patients who are pregnant or lactating
  5. Patients with scheduled kidney transplant within the next 6 months
  6. Patients scheduled to switch to peritoneal dialysis within the next 6 months
  7. Patients with life expectancy of less than 6 months
  8. Participation in any other clinical research study that would interfere with the patient's participation in this study
  9. Any concurrent disease or condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would make the patient unsuitable for participation in the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
CONTROL GROUP
Control group: index intervention guided by DSA; IVUS post-intervention only (50 patients)
TEST GROUP
Test group: index intervention guided by IVUS + DSA (50 patients

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Re-Intervention Control vs. Test
Time Frame: 6 months
Difference in time (measured in days) to AV graft failure after index intervention guided by DSA in the absence (control group) or presence of IVUS guidance (test group), assessed through 6 months post-index procedure
6 months
Define IVUS workflow
Time Frame: Day 0
Define IVUS workflow for AV graft evaluation during interventions for access site failure
Day 0
Evaluate ability of IVUS in AV Grafts
Time Frame: Day 0
Evaluate the ability of IVUS to identify targets for therapy in poorly functioning AV grafts that are not identified by DSA
Day 0

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
IVUS vs DSA alone- Decision making
Time Frame: Day 0
Percentage of time IVUS changes decision making during the index procedure (test group)
Day 0
% patients requiring re-intervention
Time Frame: 3 months and 6 months
Percentage of patients with graft failure or need for reintervention at 3 months and 6 months (c0ntrol and test)
3 months and 6 months
Assess CHROMOFLO in AV grafts
Time Frame: Day 0
Assess the ability of ChromaFlo® to identify residual thrombus in the hemodialysis access circuit
Day 0

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: John Ross, MD, Regional Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 22, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 22, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

August 27, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 20, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 19, 2015

Last Verified

February 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Ross Pilot

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on THROMBOSED AV GRAFTS

Subscribe