Haloperidol and Lorazepam for Delirium in Patients With Advanced Cancer

July 15, 2026 updated by: M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

A Preliminary Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial of Haloperidol and Lorazepam for Delirium in Patients With Advanced Cancer Admitted to a Palliative Care Unit

This randomized phase II trial studies how well haloperidol with or without lorazepam works in reducing confusion, disorientation, and inability to think or remember clearly (delirium) in patients with cancer that has spread to other places in the body and usually cannot be cured or controlled with treatment. Palliative therapy with haloperidol and lorazepam may reduce symptoms of delirium and help patients with advanced cancer live more comfortably. It is not yet known whether lorazepam may be an effective treatment for delirium when given with haloperidol.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To compare the effect of single dose lorazepam and placebo as an adjuvant to haloperidol on the intensity of agitation (Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale) over 8 hours.

II. To assess the within-arm effect of single-dose lorazepam or placebo, as an adjuvant agent with haloperidol, on agitation intensity (Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale) over 8 hours in patients admitted to an acute palliative care unit.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To compare the effect of single dose lorazepam and placebo as an adjuvant to haloperidol on (1) delirium related distress in nurses and caregivers, (2) delirium duration, (3) need for rescue doses of neuroleptics, (4) delirium recall, (5) symptom expression (Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale), (6) communicative capacity, (7) adverse effects, (8) discharge outcomes, and (9) survival in cancer patients.

II. To evaluate proportion of patients who consent and are randomized to study however drop out before being treated or before finishing 8-hour Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS) assessment; and the reasons of drop-outs will be documented and reported.

III. To explore the changes in biomarker levels in saliva samples (salivary cortisol, cholinesterase, C-reactive protein, interleukin-1 beta, -6, and -10) over time and in association with delirium severity.

IV. To examine the inter-rater reliability of RASS in the Acute Palliative Care Unit (APCU) setting between the bedside nurse and the research nurse at the time of study enrollment.

V. To conduct exploratory analyses on RASS as an outcome. VI. To examine the association among rescue medication use, RASS and perceived comfort by the nurses and caregivers.

VII. To examine the proportion of patients enrolled onto the delirium trial who achieved control of agitation and did not require the randomized study medication.

VIII. To identify patient factors associated with control of agitated delirium.

OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.

ARM I: Patients receive lorazepam intravenously (IV) over 1-2 minutes and haloperidol IV every 6 hours or every 1 hour if needed.

ARM II: Patients receive placebo IV over 1-2 minutes and haloperidol IV every 6 hours or every 1 hour if needed.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
93

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • PATIENTS:
  • Diagnosis of advanced cancer (defined as locally advanced, metastatic, recurrent, or incurable disease)
  • Admitted to Acute Palliative Care Unit (APCU)
  • Delirium as per the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV- TR) criteria
  • Hyperactive/mixed delirium with RASS >= 2 in the last 24 hours
  • On scheduled haloperidol of =< 8 mg in the last 24 hours
  • Legally authorized representative consent
  • FAMILY CAREGIVERS:
  • Patient's spouse, adult child, sibling, parent, other relative, or significant other (defined by the patient as a partner)
  • Age 18 or older
  • At the patient's bedside at least 4 hours each day during patient delirium episode
  • Patients and family caregivers able to communicate in English or Spanish

Exclusion Criteria:

  • PATIENTS
  • History of myasthenia gravis or acute narrow angle glaucoma
  • History of neuroleptic malignant syndrome
  • History of Parkinson's disease or dementia
  • Uncontrolled seizure disorder
  • History of hypersensitivity to haloperidol or benzodiazepine
  • On regular doses of benzodiazepine or chlorpromazine within the past 48 hours
  • Previously documented and persistent corrected QT (QTc) prolongation (> 500 ms)
  • Heart failure exacerbation at the time of enrollment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Lorazepam + Haloperidol
Participants given a single dose of lorazepam 3 mg by vein, in addition to a standardized dose of haloperidol 8 mg/day by vein, while in palliative care unit. Questionnaire completion at baseline, and every day while participant is in the palliative care unit. These questions will take about 20 minutes to complete
Drug: Lorazepam
3 mg by vein one time only.
Drug: Haloperidol decanoate
8 mg/day by vein.
Behavioral: Questionnaires
Questionnaire completion at baseline, and every day while participant is in the palliative care unit. These questions will take about 20 minutes to complete.
Other Names:
  • Surveys
Active Comparator: Placebo + Haloperidol
Participants receive placebo, preservative free 0.9% normal saline, by vein plus a standardized dose of haloperidol 8 mg/day by vein, while in palliative care unit. Questionnaire completion at baseline, and every day while participant is in the palliative care unit. These questions will take about 20 minutes to complete
Drug: Haloperidol decanoate
8 mg/day by vein.
Behavioral: Questionnaires
Questionnaire completion at baseline, and every day while participant is in the palliative care unit. These questions will take about 20 minutes to complete.
Other Names:
  • Surveys
Drug: Placebo
Placebo consisting of preservative free 0.9% normal saline given one time by vein.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale Score (Baseline to 8 hr), Points
Time Frame: Baseline to 8 hours
The primary outcome was change in Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale score from baseline to 8 hours after treatment administration. Richmond Agitation-Sedation Score ranged from -5 (unarousable) to +4 (very agitated) , where 0 denotes a calm and alert patient.
Baseline to 8 hours
Absolute Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale Score at 8 Hour, Points
Time Frame: 8 hours
Absolute score of Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale at 8 hr, points. Richmond Agitation-Sedation Score ranged from -5 (unarousable) to +4 (very agitated) , where 0 denotes a calm and alert patient.
8 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale Score From Baseline to 30 Min
Time Frame: Baseline to 30 minutes
Change in Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale score from baseline to 30 min. Richmond Agitation-Sedation Score ranged from -5 (unarousable) to +4 (very agitated) , where 0 denotes a calm and alert patient.
Baseline to 30 minutes
Number of Participants With Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale Score >=1 Within 8 hr
Time Frame: Baseline to 8 hours
Number of participants with Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale score >=1 within 8 hr. Richmond Agitation-Sedation Score ranged from -5 (unarousable) to +4 (very agitated) , where 0 denotes a calm and alert patient.
Baseline to 8 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: David Hui, MD, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 26, 2016

Study Completion (Estimated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 20, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 23, 2013

First Posted (Estimated)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 24, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 17, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 15, 2026

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2013-0345
  • NCI-2013-02351 (Registry Identifier: NCI CTRP)
  • 1R21CA186000-01A1 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings