Analysis of Snore Sound Following Minimal Invasive Surgery in Sleep-disordered Breathing Patients

July 28, 2014 updated by: Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
  1. Background:The methods of anti-snore (treatment of snoring ) can be divided into conservative, invasive and minimal invasive treatment. IN brief, minimal invasive surgery involving radiofrequency and pillar implant demonstrates significantly improvement of snoring without major complication. Previous studies usually evaluated snoring through subjective measures such as visual analog scale visual analog scale. Rare reports analyzed snore sound instrumentally and no report demonstrates the correlation between subjective perception and objective assessment of snoring before and after surgical intervention.
  2. Purposes:

    1. Development of snore sound spectrum.
    2. Exploration of the correlation between subjective perception and objective assessment of snoring.
    3. Comparison of changes in snoring before and after minimal invasive surgery and between two kinds of MIS to have a understanding of surgical impact in subjective and objective measurement.
  3. Method:We plan to enroll 30 subjects diagnosed by polysomnography as simple snoring or mild OSA with major complaint of snoring and favorable anatomic structure for minimal invasive surgery. All eligible subjects will be instructed the purpose, process and all related rights of this study and sign inform consent in outpatient clinic. Subjects start to complete Snore Outcome Survey (SOS, a validated questionnaire) and visual analog sure of snoring (VAS). Objective overnight snore sound recoding is arranged in sleep center. Subjects then receive minimal invasive surgery:radiofrequency or pillar implant of the soft palate by randomization. Both radiofrequency and pillar implant are common techniques in treating snoring and performed under local anesthesia as an outpatient procedure on sitting position. All subjects received repeated snore sound recording and completion of SOS and VAS three months after MIS.
  4. Outcomes

    1. Development of snore sound spectrum in sleep-disorder breathing patients.
    2. Correlation of parameters between snore sound recording (loudness, frequency, count, regularity, etc ) and clinical parameters.
    3. Correlation between objective (snore sound analysis) and subjective (SOS,VAS) assessment of snoring.
    4. Comparison of changes in snoring (particular in objective assessment) after radiofrequency or pillar implant.
    5. Comparison of changes in snoring between radiofrequency and pillar implant.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Recent publications have demonstrated reductions in snoring with several minimal invasive surgery (MIS) methods of the soft palate including radiofrequency (RF) surgery and pillar implant (PI). Despite modest effects in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea, patients often wish to receive MIS for habitual snoring. However, the efficacy in reducing snoring has mainly been determined by self-reported questionnaires in the past. Further, the definition of surgical success in snoring treatment has not been universally defined. To date, changes in snoring sound characteristics following MIS have not been demonstrated.

Many cohort studies and a few randomized controlled trials or clinical controlled trials have compared MIS with a placebo, different energy generators, different material rigidity, or different operative techniques. RF of the soft palate produces volumetric tissue reduction and selective scar tissue5 to reduce obstruction and induce stiffness. However, the RF energy delivered to the soft palate can be inadequate and may result in residual or recurrent snoring. PI can decrease palatal flutter by increasing the rigidity of the soft palate through implant identity and tissue fibrosis. In addition, PI can be chronically retained in the muscle layer of the soft palate thereby producing a long-term anti-snoring effect. Nevertheless, whether PI provides a better efficacy in the treatment of snoring than RF surgery is still unknown.

The primary aim of the current study was to compare the anti-snoring effect between PI and RF by subjective assessments in a randomized controlled parallel trial. The secondary aim was to explore and compare the acoustic changes in snoring sounds after PI and RF.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Taoyuan
      • Kweishan, Taoyuan, Taiwan, 333
        • Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. simple snoring or mild obstructive sleep apnea
  2. major complaint of snoring
  3. favorable anatomic structure for minimal invasive surgery.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. moderate or severe obstructive sleep apnea
  2. pathological obesity
  3. significant craniofacial anomaly
  4. elderly
  5. unfavorable anatomic structure for minimal invasive surgery.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Pillar implant

Arm 1- Pillar implant (Study group):

15 subjects undergo pillar implant surgery of the soft palate for the treatment of snoring.

Subjects receive pillar implant of the soft palate under local anesthesia as an outpatient procedure on sitting position. Using the delivery tool of the pillar implant system, the mucosa of the soft palate close to the hard palate-soft palate junction (approximate 0.5 cm) was punctured in the midline. The needle was inserted to the uvular muscle and moved parallel to the curve of the soft palate towards the tip of the uvula. After reaching the insertion point, the implant was delivered steadily after which the needle was withdrawn. This process was repeated for the second and third implants in the bilateral para-midline with a 0.2 cm horizontal distance from the first implant.
Other Names:
  • Pillar implant (Medtronic Inc., USA)
Active Comparator: Radiofrequency

Arm 2- Radiofrequency (control group):

15 subjects undergo radiofrequency of the soft palate for the treatment of snoring.

Subjects receive radiofrequency under local anesthesia as an outpatient procedure on sitting position. radiofrequency energy was delivered via a generator (Somnus® Model S2, Gyrus-ACMI Corporation, Maple Grove, MN, USA) with the power set to 10 watts and the maximal target temperature to 85°C. The needle electrode was inserted through the mucosa into the muscle layer at the entry points (approximately 1 cm below the hard palate-soft palate junction). The electrode was kept in place until 600 J had been delivered at the midline and 300 J at both para-midline sites (approximately 1 cm horizontal distance).
Other Names:
  • Somnus® Model S2 (Gyrus-ACMI Corporation, USA)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in VAS Score After MIS
Time Frame: baseline and 3 months following surgery
The mean change in subjective snoring severity (VAS) at 3 months after MIS was the primary outcome measurement.
baseline and 3 months following surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in SOS Score After MIS
Time Frame: baseline and 3 months following surgery
Change in SOS score at 3 months after radiofrequency or pillar implant were calculated.
baseline and 3 months following surgery
Percent Change in Total-SI After MIS
Time Frame: baseline and 3 months following surgery
Percent change ([after value-before value]/[before value]*100) in Total-SI (event/hour) before and at 3 months after surgery was calculated.
baseline and 3 months following surgery
Percent Change in Total-Imax After MIS
Time Frame: baseline and 3 months following surgery
Percent change ([after value-before value]/[before value]*100) in Total-Imax (dB) before and at 3 months after surgery was calculated.
baseline and 3 months following surgery
Percent Change in Total-Imean After MIS
Time Frame: baseline and 3 months following surgery
Percent change ([after value-before value]/[before value]*100) in Total-Imean (dB) before and at 3 months after surgery was calculated.
baseline and 3 months following surgery
Percent Change in Total-Fpeak After MIS
Time Frame: baseline and 3 months following surgery
Percent change ([after value-before value]/[before value]*100) in Total-Fpeak (Hz) before and at 3 months after surgery was calculated.
baseline and 3 months following surgery
Percent Change in Total-Fmean After MIS
Time Frame: baseline and 3 months following surgery
Percent change ([after value-before value]/[before value]*100) in Total-Fmean (Hz) before and at 3 months after surgery was calculated.
baseline and 3 months following surgery
Percent Change in B1-SI After MIS
Time Frame: baseline and 3 months following surgery
Percent change ([after value-before value]/[before value]*100) in B1-SI (event/hour) before and at 3 months after surgery was calculated.
baseline and 3 months following surgery
Percent Change in B1-Imax After MIS
Time Frame: baseline and 3 months following surgery
Percent change ([after value-before value]/[before value]*100) in B1-Imax (dB) before and at 3 months after surgery was calculated.
baseline and 3 months following surgery
Percent Change in B1-Imean After MIS
Time Frame: baseline and 3 months following surgery
Percent change ([after value-before value]/[before value]*100) in B1-Imean (dB) before and at 3 months after surgery was calculated.
baseline and 3 months following surgery
Percent Change in B1-Fpeak After MIS
Time Frame: baseline and 3 months following surgery
Percent change ([after value-before value]/[before value]*100) in B1-Fpeak (Hz) before and at 3 months after surgery was calculated.
baseline and 3 months following surgery
Percent Change in B1-Fmean After MIS
Time Frame: baseline and 3 months following surgery
Percent change ([after value-before value]/[before value]*100) in B1-Fmean (Hz) before and at 3 months after surgery was calculated.
baseline and 3 months following surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Hsueh Yu Li, professor, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 29, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 27, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

October 7, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

August 18, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 28, 2014

Last Verified

October 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • hyli38

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Clinical Trials on Pillar implant

Search Similar Trials