Neurobiological Aspects of the Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (NAADHD)

April 30, 2014 updated by: Eduardo Pondé de Sena, Federal University of Bahia

Neurobiological Aspects of the Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: Contribution of the Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Control Inhibitory.

Evaluating neurobiological disorder associated with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) and the contribution of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in the adaptation of inhibitory control.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

  1. Assess the neurobiological aspects evidenced by the amount of brain electrical activity observed by the amplitude of waves through graphs in patients with ADHD, using quantitative electroencephalography;
  2. Study the contribution of transcranial direct current stimulation compared with sham in the adequacy of inhibitory control in ADHD patients through neuropsychological test-Go/No Go;
  3. Assessing the efficacy of tDCS in neurobiological parameters evidenced by quantitative EEG in patients with ADHD;
  4. Perform the Reconstruction of the Functional Brain Network of each subject based on the quantitative EEG data through computational and mathematical modeling;
  5. Register indicators of quality of life in adults with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder through the Quality of Life Questionnaire for Adults with ADHD (AAQoL).

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
60

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Brazil
    • Bahia
      • Salvador, Bahia, Brazil, 40000-000
        • Federal University of Bahia

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Signature of the informed consent;
  • Diagnosis of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder based on DSM-IV-TR and Adult Self-Report Scale (ASRS-18);
  • Adequate eyesight and hearing (or usual corrective methods such as glasses or hearing aid) that allows performing neuropsychological test and questionnaires;
  • Residents in Bahia/Brazil;
  • Over 18 years.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Major psychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia and bipolar disorder;
  • Inability to understand the questionnaires used or illiterate;
  • Abuse of psychoactive substances, except nicotine and caffeine, in the last 12 months.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
Subjects will undergo to Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation with anode in left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and cathode in right supra orbicular region. The stimulus will be 1mA for 20 minutes.
Device: Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
This technique consists in the use of low voltage electric current to increase or reduce neuronal excitability in the area stimulated. This is a non-invasive and safe intervention having infrequent and insignificant side effects characterized by mild local discomfort, itching, tingling and/or headache of short term.
Other Names:
  • tDCS
Sham Comparator: TDCS-Sham
Subjects will undergo to procedure similar to the Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation with anode in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and left cathode region supraorbicular right. They will receive a stimulus of 1mA only in initial 30 seconds and it will change the electrical charge for 0mA after this time, however the electrodes will be kept for 20 minutes as the active arm.
Device: Sham
Same character of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation but without current

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quantitative electroencephalography
Time Frame: During the only day of the assessment, we will do it before (during 8 minutes) and after (during 8 minutes more) tDCS
Quantitative electroencephalography to assess the neurobiological aspects evidenced by the amount of brain electrical activity observed by the amplitude of waves through graphs.
During the only day of the assessment, we will do it before (during 8 minutes) and after (during 8 minutes more) tDCS

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Functional Brain Network
Time Frame: During the only day of the assessment, we will do it before and after tDCS
Functional Brain Network based on the quantitative EEG data through computational and mathematical modeling. During the only day of the assessment, we will do it before (we will get this information from EEG recording during 8 minutes before do the stimulation) and after tDCS(we will get this information from EEG recording during 8 minutes after the stimulation).
During the only day of the assessment, we will do it before and after tDCS

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Go/No Go test
Time Frame: During the only day of the assessment, we will do it before and after tDCS
Neuropsychological test to assess the adequacy of inhibitory control. During the only day of the assessment, we will do it before (after 5 minutes of EEG recording, we will start the Go/No go test keeping the EEG recording for 3 minutes, and after it we will do tDCS) and after the tDCS (after 5 minutes of EEG recording, we will restart the Go/No go test keeping the EEG recording for 3 minutes).
During the only day of the assessment, we will do it before and after tDCS

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Federal University of Bahia

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Eduardo P de Sena, PhD, Federal University of Bahia
  • Study Director: Camila S Cosmo, PhD student, Federal University of Bahia

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 29, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 18, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 24, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 1, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 30, 2014

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 285.841

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings