Treatment of Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Cancer After Gemcitabine Failure.

May 14, 2014 updated by: Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo

A Prospective Study to Evaluate the Combination of Metformin With Paclitaxel in the Treatment of Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Cancer After Gemcitabine Failure.

In Brazil pancreatic adenocarcinoma represents 2% of tumors, and 4% mortality being an uncommon disease, however very aggressive.Only 20% of cases are indicated for curative surgery, of which only 20% are alive within 5 years. For locally, advanced or metastatic disease, since 1997, single chemotherapy with gemcitabine is the standard treatment for first line, with survival around 6 months approximately.There is no standard treatment regimen for second-line, however Paclitaxel demonstrated effect on second-line phase II study. Metformin is an oral hypoglycemic drug used for treatment of diabetes mellitus. There is a growing number of preclinical studies which show antitumor effect against pancreatic adenocarcinoma, probably due to the effect of anti-insulin growth factor (IGF-1). This study will add metformin to standard treatment for second line of locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma in ICESP previously treated with gemcitabine. The objective is to evaluate whether metformin improves the efficacy of the standard treatment with paclitaxel by clinical and radiological evaluation.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
41

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Brazil
    • SP
      • Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil, 01246000
        • ICESP

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Pancreatic advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma histologically confirmed.
  • Previously treatment with gemcitabine as adjuvant or metastatic disease.
  • Clinical or radiological evidence of disease progression, determined by physician. Is not mandatory RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) evaluation to determine the progression of disease before the study inclusion.
  • Patient with intolerance to gemcitabine, even without disease progression, are also eligible.
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0 - 2
  • At least 10 weeks of life expectation.

  • Adequate organ function defined as:

    • Serum AST (aspartate aminotransferase) and ALT (alanine aminotransferase)≤ 2.5 × ULN (upper normal limit)
    • Total Bilirubin ≤ 2,0 x ULN
    • Absolute neutrophil count ≥ 1,500/ mm3
    • Platelets ≥100.000/ mm3
    • Hemoglobin ≥ 8,0 g/dl
    • Serum Creatinine ≤ 1,5 ULN and clearance of creatinine estimated (Cockcroft- Gault) ≥ 50 ml/min
  • Signed written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Major surgical procedure within 4 weeks of the beginning of the treatment.
  • History of serious clinical or psychiatric disease.
  • Symptomatic hypoglycemia at the screening visit.
  • Target lesion radiotherapy within 4 weeks of the beginning of the treatment.
  • Treatment with any anti-cancer investigational drug.
  • Treatment with any IGF-I or IGFR-I
  • Treatment with metformin within 12 months prior to commencing study treatment
  • For female patients, current pregnancy and/or lactation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Paclitaxel and Metformin
Drug: Paclitaxel
80 mg/m2, IV, Day 1, Day 8 and Day 15.
Drug: Metformin
850mg, PO, every 8 hours, daily.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Radiologic control of disease
Time Frame: Every 8 weeks from the date of first dose of treatment until disease progression.
The radiologic image will be analyzed by RECIST 1.0 criteria.
Every 8 weeks from the date of first dose of treatment until disease progression.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to progression.
Time Frame: Every 8 weeks from the date of first dose of treatment until disease progression.
Thorax and abdominal computerized tomography and Ca 19.9 tumor marker dosage every 8 weeks until disease progression.
Every 8 weeks from the date of first dose of treatment until disease progression.
To estimate the biochemical response through the measurement of serum CA19.9 levels.
Time Frame: From the date of first dose of treatment until disease progression.
From the date of first dose of treatment until disease progression.
To evaluate the clinical benefits
Time Frame: Every 4 weeks during the treatment period until disease progression.

Will be evaluate:

  • ECOG
  • Treatment with opioids
  • Pain
  • Weight
Every 4 weeks during the treatment period until disease progression.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Rachel SP Riechelmann, MD, Instituto do Cancer do Estado de São Paulo

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 6, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 22, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 28, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 16, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 14, 2014

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • NP 96/2010

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings