Cedar Honey in Oral Lichen Planus
Cedar Honey in Treatment of Oral Lichen Planus: a Randomized Clinical Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Phase 2
- Phase 1
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Khorasan Razavi
-
Mashhad, Khorasan Razavi, Iran, Islamic Republic of
- Oral Medicine Department of Mashhad dental School,Oral and Maxillofacial diseases research center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- clinically and histopathologically confirmed oral lichen planus without dysplasia in histopathologic evaluation
- Severity of pain≥2 (VAS score)
- Severity of lesions≥2 (tong prasom criteria)
- absence of any treatment in the last month
- absence of kidney or liver diseases( due to systemic administration of fluconazole to both groups)
Exclusion Criteria:
- evidence of lichenoid reaction in clinical or histopathologic assessment
- loss of follow up
- pregnant patients
- diabetic patients
- any other mucosal disease
- any severe systemic disease
- patients who refuse doctor's advice
- any unexpected adverse effect of honey
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: cedar honey
The two study groups were provided with standard treatment(dexamethasone and Fluconazole).The Case group(A) received cedar honey, 20 ml 3 times daily by swish and swallow technique, in addition to the standard treatment .
|
|
|
No Intervention: control group
the control group (B) only received standard treatment(Dexametazone and Fluconazole).
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
severity of lesions
Time Frame: 4 weeks
|
severity of lesions due to thong prasom criteria
|
4 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
size of lesions
Time Frame: 4 weeks
|
A sterile caulis was used to measure the maximum diameter of erosive and atrophic lesions and the maximum width perpendicular to the maximum diameter was recorded.
|
4 weeks
|
Other Outcome Measures
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
pain of lesions
Time Frame: 4 weeks
|
Pain or burning sensation was assessed by using a visual analog scale (VAS).
Patients marked the point from 0(no pain) to 10(extreme pain) representing their present pain perception
|
4 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: Majid Sanatkhani, Assistant Professor, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 900166
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.