Fenobam on Heat/Capsaicin Induced Hyperalgesia in Healthy Volunteers

April 27, 2016 updated by: Laura Cavallone

A Double Blind, Randomized, Placebo Controlled, Crossover Study to Investigate the Anti-hyperalgesic Efficacy of a Single Dose of Fenobam on Heat/Capsaicin Induced Cutaneous Hyperalgesia in Adult Healthy Volunteers.

Our goal is to demonstrate that healthy volunteers treated with fenobam will develop a significantly reduced area of cutaneous hyperalgesia compared to volunteers treated with placebo, after exposure to the heat/capsaicin model of cutaneous sensitization. Additionally we are going to assess changes in mood/affect and cognitive function of subjects following administration of fenobam and after cutaneous sensitization compared to baseline.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

All subjects will receive a topical dose of capsaicin cream 0.1%(Capzasin-HP) to the forearm at the start of the study visit. The order of the 2 treatment regimens indicated below will be randomized and blinded to subjects and researchers.

Treatment Regimen 1: Fenobam [1-(3-chlorophenyl)-3-(1-methyl-4-oxo-2-imidazolidinylidine) urea hydrate]: administration of one 150 mg gelatin capsule.

Treatment Regimen 2: Placebo (lactose monohydrate): administration of one 150 mg gelatin capsule.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
33

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Missouri
      • St. Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
        • Washington University School of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 50 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. 18-50 year old
  2. Good general health with no remarkable medical conditions (e.g. liver, kidney, heart, or lung failure)
  3. BMI between 20-33
  4. Willing to comply with study guidelines as outlined in protocol [including: women of childbearing age must be willing to use a double-barrier method (e.g. oral contraception and condom) for contraception during participation in the study]
  5. Willing to provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Anatomical malformation of upper extremities
  2. Status post recent trauma or chronic lesions on either forearm
  3. Medication use (includes vitamin, herbal, dietary and mineral supplements and grapefruit products during or within 14 days prior to study participation; excludes contraceptives)
  4. History of allergy or intolerance to capsaicin
  5. History of multiple drug allergies
  6. History of addiction to drugs or alcohol (prior or present addiction or treatment for addiction)
  7. History of chronic pain syndromes
  8. Pregnant and nursing females
  9. Smokers

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Treatment regimn 1
150 mg Fenobam Orally - once
Drug: Fenobam
Fenobam 150 mg will be administered and subjects will be monitored for up to 8 hours. During the study day questionnaires will be administered, blood will be drawn a testing site will be marked and pain testing and heat/capsaicin sensitization will be measured.
Other Names:
  • [1-(3-chlorophenyl)-3-(1-methyl-4-oxo-2-imidazolidinylidine) urea hydrate]
Placebo Comparator: Treatment Regimen 2
Placebo orally - once
Drug: Placebo
A placebo will be administered and subjects will be monitored for up to 8 hours. During the study day questionnaires will be administered, blood will be drawn a testing site will be marked and pain testing and heat/capsaicin sensitization will be measured.
Other Names:
  • Lactose monohydrate

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Suppression of the development of cutaneous hyperalgesia and allodynia around the area treated with heat/capsaicin.
Time Frame: During approximately 7 hours of consecutive assessments
size of the area of hyperalgesia and allodynia around the area sensitized by heat/capsaicin as quantified by cutaneous stimulation with foam brush strokes and a von Frey filament requiring 26 g of bending force.
During approximately 7 hours of consecutive assessments

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluation of nociception after drug administration as evaluated by prolonged (1 min) thermal stimulation on normal (untreated) skin.
Time Frame: During approximately 7 hours of consecutive assessments
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) rating of pain perception at 1 min 45°C heat stimulation on normal skin.
During approximately 7 hours of consecutive assessments
Assessment of Heat Pain Detection Thresholds (HPDT) in normal and sensitized skin pre and post treatment with fenobam.
Time Frame: During approximately 7 hours of consecutive assessments
lowest temperature perceived as painful with stimulation starting at 32°C and with a safety cut-off at 52°C.
During approximately 7 hours of consecutive assessments
Absence of significant side effects
Time Frame: 7 days
Determined by subjects' monitoring during treatment sessions and follow up at 1 day and 1 week after treatment with drug.
7 days
Assessment of significant change in mood/affect
Time Frame: During approximately 6 hours of consecutive assessments
As determined by evaluation of the subjects by combined brief Positive And Negative Affect Scale/Brief State Anxiety Measure (PANAS/BSAM)
During approximately 6 hours of consecutive assessments
Assessment of significant change in cognitive function
Time Frame: During approximately 6 hours of consecutive assessments
As determined by evaluation of the Letter and Number Sequencing (LNS) assessment
During approximately 6 hours of consecutive assessments

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Laura Cavallone

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Laura F Cavallone, M.D., Washington University School of Medicine

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
February 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 4, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 4, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 11, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 29, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 27, 2016

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 201311094

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings