Intimacy-Enhancing Couples' Intervention for Localized Prostate Cancer
RATIONALE: Participating in a therapy program may enhance communication and intimacy between men with prostate cancer and their partners.
PURPOSE: This randomized clinical trial is studying how well therapy enhances communication and intimacy for men with early stage prostate cancer and for their partners.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Aim 1 A. To evaluate the impact of an Intimacy-Enhancing Couples' intervention (IEC) versus a General Health and Wellness Intervention (GHW) and a Usual care control (UC) on patient and partner psychological and relationship outcomes.
B. To determine whether relationship length, pre-intervention relationship satisfaction, and men's pre-intervention masculinity moderate the effects of IEC on couples' psychological and relationship outcomes
Aim 2 A. To evaluate whether IEC has an effect on couples' communication and intimacy when compared with GHW and UC and to determine whether changes in relationship communication and intimacy mediate changes in couples' psychological and relationship outcomes.
Exploratory Aim:
A. To evaluate the impact of IEC versus GHW on physical activity and fruit and vegetable intake as well as each partner's support for the other partner's adoption of greater physical activity and more fruit and vegetable intake.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
New Jersey
-
New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States, 08903
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey
-
Newark, New Jersey, United States, 07103
- The University Hospital
-
Whippany, New Jersey, United States, 07981
- Garden State Urology
-
-
New York
-
New York, New York, United States, 10022
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19111
- Fox Chase Cancer Center
-
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19104
- Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patient has a primary diagnosis of localized prostate cancer (T1, T2, N=0 M=0, T3 N=0 M=0)
- Patient had surgery or initiated radiation treatment (brachytherapy or external beam radiation) or began pre-radiation Androgen deprivation therapy within the past 12 months.
- Patient is currently married or living with a partner, with relationship duration at least 1 year
- Patient and partner live within a 1 hour commuting distance to recruitment site
- Patient and partner read and speak English
- Patient has an Impact of Events Scale (IES) score greater than or equal to 16 and/or partner has an IES score greater than or equal to 17.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patient had a previous definitive treatment for prostate cancer
- Patient has a concurrent diagnosis of another cancer (other than non-melanoma skin cancer)
- Partner is diagnosed with cancer (other than non-melanoma skin cancer)
- Patient or partner have a significant hearing impairment
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Intimacy-Enhancing Couples
Patients and their partners receive communication and intimacy-enhancing intervention (IEC) once a week comprising the following five 90-minute sessions: Orientation and Stories of the Cancer Experience; Communication and Listening to Partner's concerns; Communication and Coping with Cancer Issues as a Team; Being Supportive to Solve Concerns; and Reflecting on Changes and Future Adaptation.
|
|
|
Active Comparator: General Health and Wellness
Patients and their partners receive a General Health and Wellness intervention focusing on nutrition and physical activity once a week comprising of five 90-minute sessions: Introduction and Nutrition Basics; Nutrition and Prevention of Recurrence; Nutritional Review and Introduction to Relaxation; Physical Activity Basics; Aerobics and Resistance Exercises and Wrap up.
|
|
|
Other: Usual Care
Patients and their partners receive standard psychological and emotional care (usual care [UC]) (i.e., social work consultations and referral to a psychiatrist or psychologist, if requested or deemed necessary by the attending physician).
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Psychological Functioning
Time Frame: 5 years
|
General psychological functioning is assessed by the MHI-38 and the PHQ-9.
Cancer-Specific distress is assessed by using the Impact of Events Scale Revised Cancer-Specific concerns is assessed with a 10 item assessment of commonly-experienced problems.
|
5 years
|
|
Relationship Functioning
Time Frame: 5 years
|
Relationship satisfaction is assessed using the Dyadic Adjustment Scale
|
5 years
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Intimacy
Time Frame: 5 years
|
General Relationship Intimacy.
The Personal Assessment of Intimacy in Relationships Intimacy scale (PAIR) (94) is a 6 item scale assessing emotional closeness.
Cancer-specific Relationship Intimacy (95-96) Participants rate the degree to which they felt close to and emotionally intimate with their partner during discussions about the cancer experience.
|
5 years
|
|
Relationship Communication
Time Frame: 5 years
|
Perceived self-disclosure. The scale assesses the degree to which they disclose thoughts, information, and feelings about the cancer experience in the past week. Perceived partner disclosure. The scale assesses the degree to which their partner disclosed thoughts, information, and feelings. Perceived partner responsiveness. The scale assesses the degree to which the participant felt their partner understood and empathized with their disclosures.Mutual Constructive Communication. This subscale of the Communication Pattern Questionnaire (CPQ) is a 5-item scale that has been adapted. Holding back. Participants rate the degree to which they held back from talking to their partner about 11 domains of concern. Demand-Withdraw. The CPQ Demand-Withdraw subscale is a 6-item scale adapted. Mutual Avoidance. The CPQ Mutual Avoidance subscale is an adapted 6-item scale. |
5 years
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Sharon L Manne, Ph.D., Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 0220100274 (Other Identifier: IRB number)
- NCI-2012-00552 (Other Identifier: CTRP (Clinical Trails Reporting Program))
- 131023 (Other Identifier: Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.