Genome Transplant Dynamics: Non-invasive Sequencing-based Diagnosis of Rejection (GTD)

October 2, 2019 updated by: Kiran Khush, Stanford University

Genome Transplant Dynamics: Non-Invasive Sequencing-Based Diagnosis of Rejection

The purpose of this study is to determine whether shotgun sequencing technology, which can be used to detect donor DNA in recipient plasma, can be used as a rapid, accurate, non-invasive method to detect Acute Cellular Rejection (ACR) after heart transplantation. Currently, all heart transplant recipients undergo invasive heart biopsies to diagnose ACR. Thus, there is an ongoing need to monitor patients for the development of acute and chronic rejection, with the primary goal of non-invasive early detection and treatment to prevent organ damage.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Detailed Description

Previous attempts to develop a non-invasive marker of graft rejection have focused on recipient-specific immune responses, and thus have inherent limitations in both sensitivity and selectivity, especially in distinguishing rejection from infection. The investigators' goal is to use a novel DNA sequencing technology to develop a rapid, inexpensive, and non-invasive method for monitoring organ transplant recipients for graft rejection. The investigators' research is driven by the fact that acute and chronic rejection of thoracic organ transplants remain major causes of patient morbidity and mortality, and require intense resource utilization. The investigators' novel approach is the first to focus on a donor-specific marker of acute rejection. The investigators will use high throughput next generation sequencing to monitor the proportion of cell-free donor DNA to recipient DNA in the recipient's blood stream as a marker of rejection. This approach is enabled by the fact that an organ transplant is also effectively a genome transplant, and by monitoring single nucleotide polymorphisms that are specific to the donor's genome (and are not shared with the recipient's genome) one can measure the relative health of the transplanted organ. The investigators' preliminary studies show that cell-free donor DNA levels in the serum of heart transplant recipients increase prior to diagnosis of acute rejection by endomyocardial biopsy, but remain at stable low levels in the absence of acute rejection.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
65

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • California
      • Santa Clara, California, United States, 95051
        • Kaiser Permanente Northern California
      • Stanford, California, United States, 94305
        • Stanford University Hospital and Clinics

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Stanford and Lucille Packard adult and pediatric, lung or heart transplant recipients and Kaiser adult heart transplant recipients.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. All ages of heart or lung transplant recipients
  2. Recipients of re-do heart or re-do lung transplants

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients wait-listed for multiple organ transplantation (e.g. heart-kidney, heart-liver, heart and lung.)
  2. Unable or unwilling to return to Stanford for biopsy and follow-up procedures
  3. Followed by Palo Alto VA Hospital after transplant surgery (VA patients are transplanted at Stanford, but all subsequent clinical care is performed at VA hospitals)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Adult Heart Transplant Recipients
Patients >18 yrs old that received a heart-only transplant and are followed at Stanford Hospital
Pediatric Heart Transplant Recipients
Patients <18 yrs old that received a heart-only transplant and are followed at Lucile Packard Hospital
Adult Lung Transplant Recipients
Patients >18 yrs old that received a lung-only transplant and are followed at Stanford Hospital
Pediatric Lung Transplant Recipients
Patients <18 yrs old that received a lung-only transplant and are followed at Lucile Packard Hospital
Kaiser Adult Heart Transplant Recipients
Patients >18 yrs old that received a heart-only transplant at Stanford Hospital but are followed at Kaiser Permanente in Santa Clara

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of cell-free donor DNA to recipient DNA in the recipient's blood stream as a marker of rejection.
Time Frame: The outcome measure is assessed for each patient up to 5 years post-transplant. Sampling timepoints include: Days 1, 2, 3, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, Months 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24 and quarterly through year 5
We will use high throughput next generation sequencing to monitor the proportion of cell-free donor DNA to recipient DNA in the recipient's blood stream as a marker of rejection.
The outcome measure is assessed for each patient up to 5 years post-transplant. Sampling timepoints include: Days 1, 2, 3, Weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, Months 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24 and quarterly through year 5

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Stanford University

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Kaiser Foundation Research Institute

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Kiran Khush, MD MAS FACC, Stanford University Hospital and Clinics

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 29, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 29, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 28, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 8, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 15, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 4, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 2, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 17666

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings