Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Selinexor (KPT-330) in Participants With Recurrent Gliomas (KING)

January 24, 2023 updated by: Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc

A Phase 2 Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Selinexor (KPT-330) in Patients With Recurrent Gliomas

This is an open-label, multicenter, Phase 2 study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral selinexor in participants with recurrent gliomas.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Terminated

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This is an open-label, multicenter, Phase 2 study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral selinexor in participants with recurrent gliomas.

Initially, the study included 2 arms: an exploratory Surgical Arm (Arm A) with sequential enrollment for participants who require surgery and a medical arm (Arm B) for participants who are not eligible for surgery.

Enrollment in Arm B was stopped to explore alternative dosing in Protocol Versions ≥ 4.0 to potentially improve tolerability. Four arms (Arms C, D, E, and F) were added to the Medical Arm in Protocol Version 4.0. Arms E and F were eliminated in protocol version 6.0 and no participants were ever enrolled in these arms.

Participants in the primary population enrolled under Protocol Version ≥ 4.0 will be randomized to Arm C and Arm D (approximately 30 participants per arm) to explore alternative dosing to potentially improve tolerability.

After screening and registration/randomization in the study, participants enrolling in Arm A or randomized to Arm C will receive 60 mg selinexor orally twice weekly. Participants randomized to Arm D will receive 80 mg selinexor orally weekly.

Participants will be treated until progression of disease or the development of unacceptable toxicities. All participants will then undergo the End of Treatment (EOT) visit.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
76

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Denmark
      • Copenhagen, Denmark, DK-2100
        • The Phase I Unit, Dept. of Oncology, Rigshospitalet
  • Netherlands
      • Groningen, Netherlands, 9713 GZ
        • University of Groningen Faculty of Medical Sciences, Medical Oncology
      • Rotterdam, Netherlands, 3008AE
        • Erasmus MC-Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center- Neuro-Oncology Unit
  • United States
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
        • Massachusetts General Hospital
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02215
        • Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Center for Neuro-Oncology
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10032
        • Columbia University, Herbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Pathologically confirmed GBM (including all histologic variants) at first diagnosis with radiographic evidence of recurrent disease after treatment with radiotherapy and temozolomide;
  • 18 years of age or older
  • Participants enrolling in the medical arm (Arms B, C and D) must be on a stable or decreasing dose of corticosteroids (or none) for at least 5 days prior to the baseline MRI;
  • Measurable disease (according to RANO guidelines)
  • Surgical arm (Arm A) must be predicted pre-operatively to have sufficiently sized tumor to be resected and provide tissue samples for exploratory assessments.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Markedly decreased visual acuity if attributed to other causes than GBM.
  • Known active hepatitis A, B, or C
  • Participants with coagulation problems and medically significant bleeding in the month prior to start of treatment (e.g., peptic ulcer, epistaxis, spontaneous bleeding). Prior history of DVT or PE is not exclusionary.
  • Participants must not have significantly diseased or obstructed gastrointestinal tract, malabsorption, uncontrolled vomiting or diarrhea, or inability to swallow oral medications.
  • Prior treatment with bevacizumab or other direct VEGF/ VEGFR inhibitors. For any question of the definition of a direct VEGF/VEGFR inhibitor, consult Sponsor.
  • Arms C and D only: body surface area < 1.2 m².
  • < 24 days from prior temozolomide, < 6 weeks from nitrosourea, < 4 weeks from other chemotherapy or investigational agents prior to start of treatment within study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Arm A: Selinexor 60 mg and Surgery
Participants who required surgery received up to 3 doses of oral selinexor tablets 60 milligrams (mg) twice weekly (BIW) on Day 1, Day 3 and between 2 and 48 hours prior to surgery, subsequently underwent surgery for resection of their tumor and resumed selinexor tablets 60 mg BIW after recovery, during Week 1 to 4 of each 4-week cycle, until progression of disease (PD) or development of unacceptable toxicities.
Drug: Selinexor
One cycle is 28 days (4 weeks).
Other Names:
  • KPT-330
Experimental: Arm B: Selinexor 50 mg/m^2
Participants who were not eligible for surgery received selinexor tablets 50 mg per square meter (mg/m^2) BIW during Week 1 to 4 of each 4-week cycle until PD or development of unacceptable toxicities.
Drug: Selinexor
One cycle is 28 days (4 weeks).
Other Names:
  • KPT-330
Experimental: Arm C: Selinexor 60 mg
Participants who were not eligible for surgery received selinexor tablets 60 mg BIW during Week 1 to 4 of each 4-week cycle until PD or development of unacceptable toxicities.
Drug: Selinexor
One cycle is 28 days (4 weeks).
Other Names:
  • KPT-330
Experimental: Arm D: Selinexor 80 mg
Participants who were not eligible for surgery received selinexor tablets 80 mg once weekly (QW) during Week 1 to 4 of each 4-week cycle until PD or development of unacceptable toxicities.
Drug: Selinexor
One cycle is 28 days (4 weeks).
Other Names:
  • KPT-330

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
6-Month Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Rate
Time Frame: From start of study treatment up to disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (assessed up to Month 6)
The analysis of 6mPFS was performed by calculating the estimated survival probability of having PFS ≥ 6 months based on Kaplan-Meier method, where PFS was defined as the time from the start of study treatment until first documented progression based on Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria, or death from any cause. Progressive disease occurs when either of the criteria was present: greater than or equal to (≥) 25 percentage (%) increase in T1 gadolinium enhancing disease, increase in T2/ Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR), detection of new lesions, or decreased clinical status.
From start of study treatment up to disease progression or death, whichever occurred first (assessed up to Month 6)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall Response Rate (ORR)
Time Frame: Up to 71 months
The ORR was determined as percentage of participants who had either complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) using the RANO criteria. CR: No T1 gadolinium enhancing disease, stable or decreasing T2/FLAIR, no new lesions, no corticosteroid use and stable, or increasing clinical status. PR: ≥50% decrease in T1 gadolinium enhancing disease, stable or decreasing T2/FLAIR, no new lesions, stable or decreased use of corticosteroids, and stable or increased clinical status.
Up to 71 months
Overall Survival (OS)
Time Frame: From date of study treatment up to date of death (assessed up to 71 months)
The OS was calculated from the date of start of study treatment to the date of death. Participants who were still alive prior to the data cut-off for final efficacy analysis, or who dropout prior to study end, were censored on the day they were last known to be alive. The OS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method.
From date of study treatment up to date of death (assessed up to 71 months)
Progression-free Survival (PFS)
Time Frame: From start of study treatment up to disease progression (assessed up to 71 months)
The PFS was calculated from the date of start of study treatment to the date of disease progression based on RANO criteria, or date of death should progression not have occurred. Progressive disease occurs when either of the criteria was present: ≥25% increase in T1 gadolinium enhancing disease, increased T2/FLAIR, detection of new lesions, or decreased clinical status.
From start of study treatment up to disease progression (assessed up to 71 months)
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment-emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)
Time Frame: From start of study treatment administration up to 71 months
An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. A serious adverse event (SAE) was defined as an AE that was fatal; life threatening (places the participant at immediate risk of death); requires in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; was a congenital anomaly/birth defect; and other important medical events. TEAE was defined as any AE with onset or worsening of a pre-existing condition on or after the first administration of study medication through 30 days following last dose or any event considered drug-related by the Investigator through the end of the study. TEAEs included both serious and non-serious TEAEs.
From start of study treatment administration up to 71 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Karyopharm Therapeutics Inc

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Morten Mau-Sørensen, MD, Ph.D, The Phase I Unit, Dept. of Oncology, Rigshospitalet
  • Principal Investigator: Andrew B Lassman, MD, Columbia University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 3, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 23, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 23, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 17, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 11, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 18, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 26, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 24, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • KCP-330-004

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Glioma

Clinical Trials on Selinexor

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings