Comparison of the Effectiveness of Two Different Dosages of Cortisone Compared to Placebo in Rheumatoid Arthritis (CORRA)

April 8, 2020 updated by: Prof. Dr. rer. nat. H.J. Trampisch

Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Two Different Starting Dosages of Prednisolone in Early Active Rheumatoid Arthritis: a Randomized, Placebo Controlled Trial

Although cortisone is widely used in the treatment of patients with early rheumatoid arthritis, the best dosage is not known. Therefore we will compare two standard prednisolon starting dosages and placebo in the treatment of patients with early active rheumatoid arthritis on the background of the established therapy with methotrexate. In total 450 patients will be included into the study. Two different treatment arms starting with 10 or 60 mg of prednisolone, and one placebo arm. Duration of intervention is 12 weeks. In parallel, all patients start medication with methotrexate, usual dosage 15 mg/week. Primary efficacy endpoint is progression of radiographic damage after one year compared to baseline. Safety monitoring is performed.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

BACKGROUND: Although glucocorticoids (GCs) are widely used in the treatment of patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA), the best dosage for GCs, related to both, efficacy and safety, is not known.

OBJECTIVE: To compare two standard p.o. GC starting dosages and the non-use of GCs in the treatment of patients with early active RA on the background of the established 'anchor' therapy with methotrexate (MTX).

METHODS: Randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial with two treatment arms (starting with 10 or 60 mg of p.o. prednisolone (P), tapered down to 5 mg P per day within 8 weeks) and one placebo arm, each arm comprising 150 patients. Duration of intervention is 12 weeks. In parallel, all patients start medication with MTX, usual dosage 15 mg/week. Primary efficacy endpoint is progression of radiographic damage after one year compared to baseline. Secondary endpoints are: percentage of patients in remission, changes of functional capacity etc. Safety monitoring is performed.

The analysis is performed in three hierarchical steps. First step is an analysis of covariance to compare the group with an initial P dosage of 60 mg (V60) and the placebo group (Pl). In case of a statistical significant result (α = 0.05), a comparison of the group starting with 10 mg P (V10) and Pl will be done in a second step (α = 0.05). In case of superiority of V10 versus Pl, a third step will be a non-inferiority test for V10 versus V60 (α = 0.025).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

395

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bielefeld, Germany, 33617
        • Rheumatologische Schwerpunktpraxis Bielefeld
      • Bocholt, Germany, 46397
        • Rheumatologische Schwerpunktpraxis Bocholt
      • Bochum, Germany, 44787
        • Rheumatologische Schwerpunktpraxis Bochum
      • Bochum, Germany, 44791
        • Rheumaticon Internistische Schwerpunktpraxis Immunologie, Rheumatologie, Osteologie JosefCarrée Bochum
      • Dortmund, Germany, 44137
        • Rheumapraxis Dortmund
      • Dortmund, Germany, 44147
        • MVZ Dr. Kretzmann und Kollegen
      • Dortmund, Germany, 44263
        • Rheumatologische Schwerpunktpraxis Dortmund
      • Duisburg, Germany, 47057
        • Rheumapraxis Duisburg
      • Gelsenkirchen, Germany, 45891
        • Rheumapraxis Gelsenkirchen
      • Gladbeck, Germany, 45964
        • Internistische und rheumatologische Praxis Gladbeck
      • Hagen, Germany, 58089
        • Facharztzentrum Hagen
      • Hattingen, Germany, 45525
        • Orthopädisch-rheumatologische Schwerpunktpraxis
      • Hattingen, Germany, 45525
        • Rheumapraxis Hattingen
      • Herne, Germany, 44649
        • Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet
      • Herne, Germany, 44652
        • Rheumapraxis Herne
      • Lingen, Germany, 49808
        • Rheumatologische Schwerpunktpraxis Lingen
      • Lippstadt, Germany, 59555
        • Rheumapraxis am EVK
      • Marl, Germany, 45768
        • Rheumatologische Schwerpunktpraxis Marl
      • Minden, Germany, 32425
        • Rheumatologische Schwerpunktpraxis Minden
      • Münster, Germany, 48143
        • Rheumatologische Schwerpunktpraxis Münster
      • Oberhausen, Germany, 46145
        • Rheumapraxis Oberhausen
      • Paderborn, Germany, 33098
        • Rheumapraxis Paderborn
      • Ratingen, Germany, 40878
        • Rheumazentrum Ratingen
      • Rheine, Germany, 48431
        • Rheumatologische Schwerpunktpraxis Rheine
      • Warendorf, Germany, 48231
        • Rheumapraxis Warendorf

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis based on expert opinion according to the American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) 2009 criteria (Hawker 2009)
  • disease duration < 3 years
  • active disease: disease activity score (DAS) 28 erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (Prevoo et al 1995) > 4 plus ≥ 3 swollen joints

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior treatment with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) (except for hydroxychloroquine or sulfasalazine or methotrexate during the last four weeks before screening)
  • Clinically relevant comorbidity:
  • concurrent liver disease (ALT > 2 times upper limit of normal),
  • active hepatitis B or C viral infection,
  • renal disease (creatinine clearance < 30 ml/minute),
  • clinically relevant haematological disease due to the judgement of the rheumatologist,
  • uncontrolled diabetes mellitus,
  • uncontrolled arterial hypertension,
  • relevant immunodeficiency incl. HIV-infection,
  • clinically significant pulmonary fibrosis,
  • history of malignant melanoma,
  • complicated or refractory gastrointestinal ulcers,
  • presence or history of severe infections,
  • uncontrolled increased intraocular pressure,
  • pregnancy or planned pregnancy,
  • non-compliance,
  • age < 18 years

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Prednisolone 10
Prednihexal (Prednisolon), daily oral tablet, 10 mg during week one to four, 7,5 mg during week five to eight. Finally 5 mg for four weeks.
To compare two standard p.o. GC starting dosages and the non-use of GCs in the treatment of patients with early active RA on the background of the established 'anchor' therapy with methotrexate (MTX).
Other Names:
  • PredniHexal
Experimental: Prednisolone 60
Prednihexal (Prednisolon), daily oral tablet, 60 mg during the first week, weekly tapering: 40 mg, 20mg, 15mg, 10mg, 7,5mg. 7,5mg continued for one more week. Finally 5 mg for four weeks
To compare two standard p.o. GC starting dosages and the non-use of GCs in the treatment of patients with early active RA on the background of the established 'anchor' therapy with methotrexate (MTX).
Other Names:
  • PredniHexal
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
daily oral tablet

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Progression of radiographic damage after one year as quantified by the van der Heijde modification of the Sharp score (SHS). Determined at baseline and after one year.
Time Frame: 52 weeks
15 sites in each hand and wrist and six joints in each foot are examined for joint space narrowing on a scale of 0 to 437: 0 indicates no narrowing, 1 represents minimal narrowing, 2 indicates loss of 50% of the joint space, 3 indicates loss of 75% of the joint space, and 4 represents complete loss of the joint space. The erosions are counted individually, usually at 16 sites in each hand and wrist and six sites in each foot, with a maximum score of 5 given for a destroyed hand or foot joint. For joints in the feet, the van der Heijde version of the Sharp scoring system has a maximum score of 10 for a destroyed joint
52 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of patients in remission
Time Frame: 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 52 weeks
as defined by the DAS 28 score
12 weeks, 24 weeks, 52 weeks
Changes of functional capacity
Time Frame: Baseline, 12 weeks, 52 weeks
as defined by the so called "Hannover function questionnaire"
Baseline, 12 weeks, 52 weeks
Patient's assessment of disease activity
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 52 weeks
on a scale between 0 and 10
Baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 12 weeks, 24 weeks, 52 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Juergen Braun, MD, Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet, Herne/Germany

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 19, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 3, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

December 4, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 10, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 8, 2020

Last Verified

April 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 01KG1204
  • 2012-004074-25 (EudraCT Number)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Progression of Rheumatoid Arthritis

Clinical Trials on Placebo

Search Similar Trials