High Dose Rate Brachytherapy for Treatment of Keloids

December 3, 2013 updated by: Michiel van Leeuwen, Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc

Prospective Evaluation of the Use of High-dose-rate Brachytherapy for the Treatment of Recalcitrant Keloids

This prospective study evaluates the outcome of surgical excision with adjuvant high-dose-rate brachytherapy for the treatment of recalcitrant keloids. Main outcomes are recurrence rate, scar quality and physical complaints.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This prospective evaluation describes the outcome of surgical excision with adjuvant high-dose-rate brachytherapy for the treatment of recalcitrant keloids in a large mixed Fitzpatrick skin type patient population. After intralesional excision, a unique low dose radiation scheme of 2x6Gray (Gy) was administered in 2 fractions: the first within 4 hours, the second within 24 hours. Keloids were evaluated pre- and postoperative (1 week, 3, 6, 12 months, 5years). Scars were measured and recurrence was judged. An evaluation of the outcome of the scars was obtained using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale. Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS version 20.0 (SPSS, Inc, Chicago, III)

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
43

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Netherlands
    • Noord-Holland
      • Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, Netherlands, 1081HV
        • VUMC

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

6 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

All patients with recalcitrant keloids meeting inclusion criteria

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Keloid defined as excessive scar tissue raised above skin level and proliferating beyond the confines of the original lesion. Keloids were distinguished from hypertrophic scars based on the clinical judgment of experienced plastic surgeons and on the age of the scar (>1yr)
  • the keloid had been proven insensitive to at least one other treatment
  • patients had to be older than 10 years of age.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • keloids not suitable for excision with primary closure due to its size or anatomical location
  • pregnancy or diabetes

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Patients with recalcitrant keloid scars
All patients with keloids insensitive to other treatments
Procedure: Surgical excision with adjuvant high-dose-rate brachytherapy
The keloid was excised extralesionally and subsequently a metal tipped Varisource catheter was positioned between the dermal edges of the wound, 5 mm below the surface of the skin and extending out of the skin beyond the wound. Primary wound closure was performed and patients were transferred to the radiation department, where the catheter was connected to the Iridium-192 remote control afterloader. The planning target volume was defined as a cylinder along the axis of the scar, with a central diameter of 5mm. Patients received 2 fractions of HighDoseRate brachytherapy. Within 4 hours after the resection, the first brachytherapy fraction of 6 Gy at 5mm of the source axis was given. Within 24 hours after the first fraction a second fraction of 6Gy was administered to a total dose of 12Gy in 2 days. After the second fraction the catheter was gently removed.
Other Names:
  • Metal tipped Varisource catheter (external diameter: 1.6mm, length: 150cm, Varian medical systems, Palo Alto, USA)
  • Monocryl 4-0 or 5-0
  • Iridium-192 remote control afterloader (Varisource, Varian medical systems, Palo Alto, USA)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Recurrence
Time Frame: At a minimum of one year post surgery
Recurrence was defined as a growing, pruritic, nodular scar as described by Cosman and Wolff(1)
At a minimum of one year post surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Scar Quality
Time Frame: Pre- and postoperative
The scar (pre-operative) and the residual scar (post-operative at 1 week, 3,6,12 months and 5 year) was examined, photographs were taken, surface area was measured and the 'Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale' was obtained (2)
Pre- and postoperative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Michiel CE Leeuwen van, MD, VUMC

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2003

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 26, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 3, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 9, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 9, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 3, 2013

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • PlastChirVUmc 01

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Keloid

Clinical Trials on Surgical excision with adjuvant high-dose-rate brachytherapy

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings