Clinical Study of Endostar Injection Concomitant With SOX Protocols to Treat Advanced Gastric Cancer

December 6, 2013 updated by: Tang Xushan

A Randomized, Open and Control Clinical Study of Endostar Injection Concomitant With SOX Protocols in Treating Advanced Gastric Cancer

The primary objectives of this control, single-center clinical study of EndostarTM Injection with/without SOX protocols to treat advanced gastric cancer were to evaluate the clinical response rate of Endostar injection concomitant with SOX on patients with advanced gastric cancer, observe the progression-free survival time (PFS) of tumor and evaluate the safety and tolerance of Endostar injection, while the secondary objectives were to observe the influence of Endostar injection on chemotherapy-induced adverse reactions and evaluate the overall survival time of EndostarTM injection concomitant with SOX on patients with advanced gastric cancer by evaluating the response rate (RR) clinical benefit rate (CBR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Multiple pre-clinical studies have indicated that in dozens of animal tumor models and human tumor-metastatic mice tumor models, the effective rate of Endostar was 47%～91% in daily dosage of 10～100mg/kg, and covered human commonly seen malignant tumors, such as lung cancer, gastric cancer, breast cancer, colorectal cancer, hepatic cancer, malignant melanoma and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, etc.. The development and progression of gastric cancer was in association with angiogenesis. An animal research observed the influence of Endostar on tumor strains in nude mice with gastric cancer, and the results showed that tumor size shrunk rapidly and the expressions of VEGF, bFGF, VEGF-C, VEGFR-3, bcl-2 and PDGF decreased significantly after treatment in experimental group, demonstrating that Endostar could reduce angiogenesis, increase tumor cell apoptosis and inhibit tumor growth in gastric cancer. An investigation of small-sample Endostar concomitant with chemotherapy on patients with advanced gastric cancer primarily indicated the efficacy and feasibility of Endostar concomitant with chemotherapy in treating gastric cancer.

With the expanded application of Endostar in clinic, it also obtains certain effect in treating patients with lung cancer and colorectal cancer. The safety, efficacy, evaluation of relationship between benefit and risk in common or special population as well as the modified dosage of administration of Endostar in wide application should be further explored to provide sufficient scientifical basis for the safety, efficacy, applicable rule in special population and investigation of optimal administrative protocols for Endostar in wide application.

This control, single-center clinical study of EndostarTM Injection with/without SOX protocols to treat advanced gastric cancer was conducted to explore the feasibility, efficacy and safety of Endostar concomitant with SOX protocols, and to provide more evidence-based medical basis for the clinical application of Endostar.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
120

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Xinjiang
      • Urumqi, Xinjiang, China, 830011
        • Cancer Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age: 18～70 years;
  • Performance status (PS) of Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) was 0～1 or KPS scores were 60-100 scores;
  • Patients who were diagnosed with recurrent and metastatic advanced gastric cancer by histopathology and CT;
  • Patients who had more than 1 measurable nidus (common CT or MRI scanning ≥20 mm, spiral CT scanning ≥10 mm);
  • Patients who had no severe dysfunction of important organs, and were normal in blood routine test, hepatorenal function, electrolytes and cardiac function, with white blood cell count≥4.0×109/L, neutrophil count≥1.5×109/L, platelet count≥100×109/L, hemoglobin≥95g/L, serum bilirubin≤1.5 folds of upper normal limit, Alanine transaminase and glutamic oxalacetic transaminase ≤2 folds of upper normal limit, and serum creatinine≤1.5mg/dl.
  • Estimated survival time was above 3 months;
  • Patients who were well acknowledged of this study and signed the informed consent forms.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who received whole body treatment of metastatic gastric cancer previously;
  • Patients who underwent surgeries within 4 weeks before this study;
  • Patients who had allergic constitutions or were allergic to biological products of proteins and to any medicine used in this study;
  • Female patients in gestation or lactation period, or those who were interfile but received no contraception measures;
  • Patients who were with other symptoms unsuitable to this study;
  • Patients who were treated by other anti-tumor methods at that time;
  • Patients who had no measurable nidus;
  • Patients who had one of the following conditions: uncontrolled metastatic nidus in central nervous system, dysfunction of important organs, severe cardiac diseases (including congestive heart failure, uncontrollable arrhythmia, angina pectoris needed long-term drug treatment, valvular heart diseases and myocardial infarction), hypertension, women in gestation or lactation period, protracted infectious wound as well as uncontrollable psychosis history.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Oxaliplatin & Endostar injection
Oxaliplatin, 130 mg/m2 , iv, 3-4h, d1; Gimeracil and Oteracil Potassium Capsules, 40 mg/m2, po., Bid., d1-14; Endostar injection, 7.5 mg/m2/d, 2 mL/h continuous pumping into vein, d1-10; 21 d as a cycle.
Drug: Oxaliplatin
130mg/m2 , iv, 3-4h, d1, 21 d as a cycle.
Other Names:
  • L-OHP
Drug: Gimeracil and Oteracil Potassium Capsule
40 mg/m2, po., Bid., d1-14, 21 d as a cycle.
Other Names:
  • Tegafur Gimeracil Oteracil Potassium Capsule
Drug: Endostar injection
7.5 mg/m2/d, 2 mL/h continuous pumping into vein, d1-10, 21 d as a cycle.
Other Names:
  • rh-Endostatin
Active Comparator: Oxaliplatin
Oxaliplatin, 130 mg/m2 , iv, 3-4h, d1; Gimeracil and Oteracil Potassium Capsules, 40 mg/m2, po., Bid., d1-14, 21 d as a cycle.
Drug: Oxaliplatin
130mg/m2 , iv, 3-4h, d1, 21 d as a cycle.
Other Names:
  • L-OHP
Drug: Gimeracil and Oteracil Potassium Capsule
40 mg/m2, po., Bid., d1-14, 21 d as a cycle.
Other Names:
  • Tegafur Gimeracil Oteracil Potassium Capsule

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Response rate (RR)
Time Frame: The patients were followed up for 3 years.
  • Clinical RR=(CR＋PR)/total cases×100%;
  • Complete remission (CR): all visible nidi disappeared;
  • Partial remission (PR): the decreased total length of diameter of baseline nidus≥30%;
The patients were followed up for 3 years.
clinical benefit rate (CBR)
Time Frame: The patients were followed up for 3 years.
  • Clinical CBR＝(CR＋PR＋SD)/total cases×100%
  • Complete remission (CR): all visible nidi disappeared;
  • Stable disease (SD): the total length of diameter of baseline nidus decreased<that in PR or increased <that in PD.-Progressive disease (PD): the increased total length of diameter of baseline nidus≥30% or new nidus was presented;
The patients were followed up for 3 years.
progression-free survival (PFS)
Time Frame: The patients were followed up for 3 years
PFS was from randomization to tumor progression or death.
The patients were followed up for 3 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
overall survival (OS)
Time Frame: The patients were followed up for 3 years
The patients were followed up for 3 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Tang Xushan

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Tang Yong, Professor, Cnacer Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 1, 2016

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 27, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 6, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 11, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 11, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 6, 2013

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • XinjiangMU (006)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Gastric Cancer

Clinical Trials on Oxaliplatin

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings