MTA/FS Pulpotomy for Vital Primary Incisors: A Randomized Controlled Trial (MTA/FS)

February 5, 2016 updated by: Peter Judd, The Hospital for Sick Children

Mineral Trioxide Aggregate/Ferric Sulfate Pulpotomy for Vital Primary Incisors: A Randomized Controlled Trial

To compare radiographic and clinical outcomes and survival of mineral trioxide aggregate/ferric sulfate (MTA/FS) pulpotomy and root canal therapy (RCT) in carious vital primary maxillary incisors.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Dental caries is the most common chronic disease in children. Caries of the primary maxillary incisors is common in young children; often necessitating either extraction or pulp therapy. The premature loss of primary maxillary incisors can adversely affect a child's dental occlusion, ability to properly size food boluses for swallowing, speech articulation, facial esthetics and psychosocial development. Pulp treatment of cariously exposed vital primary incisors may prevent premature tooth loss as well as eliminate pain. Currently, there is a paucity of outcome investigations with regard to pulp therapy in primary incisors.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
70

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Canada
    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 1X8
        • The Hospital for Sick Children

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • children with one or more carious primary maxillary incisors where removal of dental caries will likely to produce a vital pulp exposure
  • reside in the GTA at time of inclusion
  • English-speaking

Exclusion Criteria:

  • history of spontaneous or lingering stimulated pain, swelling, fistula or sinus tract, tenderness to percussion and pathological mobility
  • incisors with preoperative radiographic evidence of periapical or periradicular radiolucency, a widened periodontal ligament space, physiological resorption, incomplete root formation, internal or external root resorption, pulp canal obliteration or pulp calcifications
  • non-restorable tooth

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: MTA/FS pulpotomy Group
Children randomized to this arm will undergo a mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) pulpotomy after hemostasis is achieved using ferric sulfate (FS).
Procedure: MTA/FS pulpotomy Group
After complete removal of all caries, if a pulp exposure is detected the pulp chamber will be opened and vital coronal pulp to a depth of 2mm below free gingival margin will be removed. A solution of ferric sulfate will be applied to the amputated pulp surface and then flushed with water. MTA paste is then used to cover over the exposed amputated pulp surface.
Active Comparator: RCT Group
Children randomized to this group will undergo the root canal therapy (RCT) technique.
Procedure: RCT Group
After complete removal of all caries, if a pulp exposure is detected the pulp chamber will be opened and the pulp tissue removed. The canal will be irrigated with water and then filled with non-reinforced ZOE.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison of MTA/FS Pulpotomy Versus RCT Treated Incisors With Acceptable Radiographic Outcome at 12 Months Post-procedure.
Time Frame: 12 months after the procedure
Two disinterested pediatric dentists classified each treated incisor into one of three outcomes: N=incisor without pathologic change; Po=pathologic change present, follow-up recommended; and Px=pathologic change present, extract. Incisors rated N or Po were considered an acceptable radiographic outcome while incisors rated as Px were considered unacceptable.
12 months after the procedure
Comparison of MTA/FS Pulpotomy Versus RCT Treated Incisors With Acceptable Radiographic Outcomes 18 Months Post-procedure.
Time Frame: 18 months after the procedure
Two disinterested pediatric dentists classified each treated incisor into one of three outcomes: N=incisor without pathologic change; Po=pathologic change present, follow-up recommended; and Px=pathologic change present, extract. Incisors rated N or Po were considered an acceptable radiographic outcome while incisors rated as Px were considered unacceptable.
18 months after the procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison of MTA/FS Pulpotomy Versus RCT Treated Incisors With Unacceptable Clinical Outcome at 12 Months Post-procedure.
Time Frame: 12 months after the procedure
Pulp treated incisors presenting with spontaneous pain, tenderness to percussion, fistula/sinus tract, soft tissue swelling and/or pathological tooth mobility were considered unacceptable clinical outcomes. Clinical outcomes between the MTA/FS pulpotomy and RCT groups were compared using Fisher's Exact test.
12 months after the procedure
Comparison of MTA/FS Pulpotomy Versus RCT Treated Incisors With Unacceptable Clinical Outcome at 18 Months Post-procedure.
Time Frame: 18 months after the procedure
Pulp treated incisors presenting with spontaneous pain, tenderness to percussion, fistula/sinus tract, soft tissue swelling and/or pathological tooth mobility were considered unacceptable clinical outcomes.
18 months after the procedure
MTA/FS Pulpotomy and RCT Treated Incisor Survival
Time Frame: 12 and 18 months
Kaplan-Meier survival curves were generated for the MTA/FS pulpotomy and RCT treatment groups. One treated incisor was selected by random draw from each subject for survival analysis to preserve independence of observations. The log-rank test was used to statistically compare survival of incisors.
12 and 18 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
The Hospital for Sick Children

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Peter Judd, DDS, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto Canada

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 18, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 18, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 24, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 11, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 5, 2016

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 1000019443

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dental Caries

Clinical Trials on MTA/FS pulpotomy Group

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings