Comparison Of Clinical And Radiological Success Of Pulpotomy Treatments Performed With Proroot MTA, NeoPUTTY MTA, TheraCal PT In Primary Teeth

November 20, 2025 updated by: Halenur Altan, Necmettin Erbakan University

The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to compare clinical and radiological success rates of NeoPutty MTA, ProRoot MTA and TheraCal PT pulpotomy in 4-10 years old healthy pediatric patients. The main question it aims to answer is:

Which of these 3 materials are best suited for pulpotomy treatment in the aspect of clinical and radiological success rates.

Participants will undergo a pulpotomy treatment in primary molar teeth with one of these materials used.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study was conducted on primary molar patients who applied to Necmettin Erbakan University Faculty of Dentistry Department of Pedodontics for a routine check-up, did not have any systemic problems, had a score of 3 and 4 according to the Frankl Behavior Scale, and whose parents' approval could be obtained, and had a pulp-related and active caries appearance in the lower jaw. Patients between the ages of 4 and 10 who are indicated for dental pulpotomy treatment will be included.

In our prospective randomized clinical study;

Pulpotomy treatment; Infiltrative/mandibular anesthesia is applied to the primary lower molar teeth, which are in contact with the pulp and have not experienced spontaneous pain, and wait until numbness occurs. Under rubber dam isolation, soft caries in the lower primary molar tooth is removed with a steel round bur.

Removal of pulp tissue: Starting from where the pulp is exposed, 1-2 mm is removed with a water-cooled high-speed diamond round bur.

Bleeding Control: It is washed with sterile serum and the cavity is disinfected using a cotton pellet impregnated with 2.5% Sodium Hypochlorite. It is checked that there is no residual pulp tissue left. For hemostasis, a cotton pellet impregnated with physiological saline is placed in the cavity.

Control group (Pro Root MTA) Pro Root MTA consists of powder and liquid components. The liquid part is added to the powder, mixed and placed in 30 primary molars as pulpotomy material. Glass ionomer cement is placed on it as a base material and the treatment is completed by making a permanent restoration with a stainless steel crown.

Working group (NeoPUTTY MTA) NeoPUTTY MTA is in injector form and has a paste consistency. Taken using a hand tool It is placed in 30 primary molars as pulpotomy material. As a base material on it Glass ionomer cement is placed and the treatment is completed by making a permanent restoration with a stainless steel crown.

Study group (Theracal PT) Theracal PT is in the form of a resin-containing syringe and is applied directly to 30 primary molars as pulpotomy material and polymerized with the help of a radiation device. Glass ionomer cement is placed on it as a base material and the treatment is completed by making a permanent restoration with a stainless steel crown.

When the literature is examined within the scope of our research, there are a limited number of studies comparing Pro Root MTA with NeoPUTTY MTA and Theracal PT. In this thesis study, it was aimed to compare its success on the pulp with the materials in the study group by using Pro Root MTA, which has proven its success on the pulp in the literature, in the control group. After the treatment of the teeth is completed, participants will be called for 6th and 9th month checks. During the control sessions, clinical and radiological evaluations of the relevant teeth will be made and periapical radiographs will be taken, maximum one from each tooth.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

90

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Meram
      • Konya, Meram, Turkey (Türkiye), 42090
        • Necmettin Erbakan University Faculty of Dentistry

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Primary molars with active caries and pulp exposure, assessed after intraoral periapical radiograph examination
  • Presence of pulp exposure during caries excavation
  • More than two-thirds of root length present
  • No history of spontaneous pain
  • Children aged 4-10 years with Frankl's positive or definitely positive behavior

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Teeth with internal or external root resorption, periapical lesions, or widening of the periodontal ligament (PDL)
  • Presence of sinus tracts or history of swelling
  • Uncontrolled pulpal bleeding from the tooth, even after 5 minutes
  • No pulp exposure during caries excavation
  • Patients or parents unwilling to participate in the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: ProRoot MTA White (Tulsa Dental Products, Tulsa, USA)
Pro Root MTA Root Canal Repair Material
Teeth were pulpotomized with Pro-Root MTA in this group.
Experimental: NeoPUTTY (NuSmile, Houston, USA)
Next Generatıon Pre-Mıxed Root & Pulp Treatment Materıal
Teeth were pulpotomized with Neo-Putty MTA in this group.
Experimental: ThraCal PT (Bisco Dental Products, Schaumburg IL, Amerika)
BISCO's TheraCal PT is a dual-cured, resin-modified calcium silicate pulpotomy treatment.
Teeth were pulpotomized with Theracal PT in this group.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical Success Of Pulpotomy Treatments Performed With Proroot MTA, NeoPUTTY MTA, TheraCal PT In Primary Teeth
Time Frame: 6 months and 9 months post-treatment

Clinical success will be evaluated at 6- and 9-month follow-up examinations by assessing the following parameters: spontaneous pain, tenderness to percussion, swelling, sinus/fistula formation, and pathological mobility.

Each parameter will be recorded as positive (present) or negative (absent). Tooth mobility will be graded according to Miller's Mobility Classification (Grades 0-3).

A tooth will be considered clinically successful if all parameters are negative (no symptoms) and mobility is within Miller's Grade 0-1.

Data will be aggregated and reported as the number and percentage of teeth with clinical success for each pulpotomy material group (ProRoot MTA, NeoPUTTY, and TheraCal PT).

6 months and 9 months post-treatment
Clinical And Radiological Success Of Pulpotomy Treatments Performed With Proroot MTA, NeoPUTTY MTA, TheraCal PT In Primary Teeths
Time Frame: 6 months and 9 months post-treatment

Radiographic success will be evaluated at 6- and 9-month follow-up visits using standardized periapical radiographs. Each radiograph will be examined for the presence or absence of the following findings: periapical radiolucency, furcal involvement, internal or external root resorption, and widening of the periodontal ligament space.

Each parameter will be recorded as positive (absent pathology) or negative (presence of any pathology).

Teeth showing no pathological findings (i.e., all parameters positive) will be classified as radiographically successful, whereas those showing any pathological change (negative) will be classified as radiographic failures.

Evaluations will be performed independently by two blinded examiners. Data will be aggregated and reported as the number and percentage of radiographically successful teeth for each pulpotomy material group (ProRoot MTA, NeoPUTTY, and TheraCal PT).

6 months and 9 months post-treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 15, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 20, 2025

First Posted (Estimated)

December 3, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 3, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 20, 2025

Last Verified

November 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • NecmettinEU03

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

We will share the results.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dentin Caries

Clinical Trials on ProRoot MTA Pulpotomy

Subscribe