Incobotulinum Toxin A (Xeomin®) As A Treatment For Focal Task-Specific Dystonia Of The Musician's Hand

April 19, 2023 updated by: David M. Simpson, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

A Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Randomized, Cross Over Pilot Study Of The Efficacy And Tolerability Of Incobotulinum Toxin A (Xeomin®) As A Treatment For Focal Task-Specific Dystonia Of The Musician's Hand

The investigational drug being studied in this protocol is Incobotulinumtoxin A (Xeomin®). Botulinum toxin (BoNT) prevents the release of the acetylcholine from peripheral nerves, inhibiting muscle contractions. BoNT is effective in relaxing overactive muscles. In musician's dystonia, the ability to reduce abnormally overactive muscles in the hand can be critical for the musical professional to continue his or her career. With the use of EMG/electrical stimulation and/or ultrasound guidance, the injector can precisely localize the individual muscles that are affected in this condition with great accuracy. Prior studies have shown that BoNT injections produce beneficial effects in forearm muscles, and less effect in shoulder or proximal arm muscles.

Possible risks in treating patients with BoNT include excessive weakness of the injected muscles. The drug may also affect non-targeted muscles. However these risks will be minimized during the screening period by carefully targeting the affected muscles and by administering low doses of BoNT. Small booster doses may be given at follow up visit (2, 4, 14 and 16-weeks after the primary injection date) if the initial injection was insufficient to produce sufficient efficacy in relief of the focal dystonia and did not produce excess weakness of the targeted muscle.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
21

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10029
        • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
      • New York, New York, United States, 10017
        • NYU Langone Health

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with focal task-specific dystonia of one or both hands, selectively triggered by performance on a musical instrument.
  • Patients must have been evaluated by Dr. Frucht at the Movement Disorders Division of Mount Sinai Medical Center as part of their clinical care.
  • Patients whose performance on an instrument is directly linked to their occupation.
  • Patients must be between the ages of 18 and 80.
  • Impairment in musical performance must be visible and demonstrable.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients whose dystonia is not severe enough to interfere with musical performance in the opinion of a skilled examiner.
  • Patients with unstable medical conditions or psychiatric conditions.
  • Patients with a medical condition that precludes them from receiving BoNT injections.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Placebo Then Botulinum Toxin
Placebo dose first does then boosters at week 2 and week 4 then 4 weeks washout, then Incobotulinumtoxin A first dose, with boosters at 2 week and week 4.
Drug: Placebo
matching placebo
Drug: incobotulinumtoxin A
Incobotulinumtoxin A is being used on average doses between 10U and 30 Units per subject, but at no time will any subject receive over 100 Units. Each study visit, the assessing physician will select the muscles and the amounts of medication to be injected.
Other Names:
  • Xeomin
Active Comparator: Incobotulinumtoxin A Then Placebo
Incobotulinumtoxin A dose first does then boosters at week 2 and week 4 then 4 weeks washout, then Placebo first dose, with boosters at 2 week and week 4.
Drug: Placebo
matching placebo
Drug: incobotulinumtoxin A
Incobotulinumtoxin A is being used on average doses between 10U and 30 Units per subject, but at no time will any subject receive over 100 Units. Each study visit, the assessing physician will select the muscles and the amounts of medication to be injected.
Other Names:
  • Xeomin

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Physician Global Perception of Change - Blinded Rater 1
Time Frame: at visit 4 (week 8)
The principal outcome measure was improvement in musical performance, measured by blinded rater, using physician global perception of change at post treatment compared to at 8 weeks. Categories are very much improved, much improved, minimal improved, no change, and minimal worse.
at visit 4 (week 8)
Physician Global Perception of Change - Blinded Rater 2
Time Frame: at visit 4 (week 8)
The principal outcome measure was improvement in musical performance, measured by blinded rater, using physician global perception of change at post treatment compared to at 8 weeks. Categories are very much improved, much improved, minimal improved, no change, and minimal worse.
at visit 4 (week 8)
Rating of Overall Musical Performance - Blinded Rater 1
Time Frame: baseline and at 8 weeks

Rating of overall musical performance based on comparison to baseline video at week 8.

Rating from +3, very much improved to -3, very much worse. Higher score indicates more improvement.
baseline and at 8 weeks
Rating of Overall Musical Performance - Blinded Rater 2
Time Frame: baseline and week 8

Rating of overall musical performance based on comparison to baseline video at week 8.

Best Overall Musical Performance on 7 point scale from +3 Very much improved to -3 Very much worse. Higher score indicates more improvement.
baseline and week 8
Quantitative MIDI Analysis Comparison
Time Frame: baseline at 24 weeks
The principal outcome measure will be improvement in musical performance, measured by self-rated questionnaire, quantitative Musical Instrument Digital Interface (MIDI) analysis and blinded high speed video analysis post treatment compared to baseline and 24 weeks.
baseline at 24 weeks
Blinded High Speed Video Analysis Comparison
Time Frame: baseline and at 24 weeks
The principal outcome measure will be improvement in musical performance, measured by self-rated questionnaire, quantitative MIDI analysis and blinded high speed video analysis post treatment compared to baseline and 24 weeks.
baseline and at 24 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)
Time Frame: baseline and at 8 weeks
Patient reported outcomes measured by questionnaires that address adverse events and the impact of quality of life using the perceived stress scale. A 10-item questionnaire, each item scored 0 (never) to 4 (very often), full scale from 0-40, with higher score indicating higher perceived stress. the more often the person perceives stress Change in PSS at week 8 compared to baseline
baseline and at 8 weeks
Change in Medical Research Council (MRC) Scale
Time Frame: baseline and at 8 weeks

Motor strength using a dynamometer of the finger/wrist/elbow flexors to document any treatment induced weakness.

Scale from 0-4, higher score indicates poorer health outcomes.
baseline and at 8 weeks
Change in Motor Strength Comparison
Time Frame: baseline and at 8 weeks

Motor strength tested using a dynamometer to document any weakness the treatment may produce as compared to the baseline visit and 8 weeks.

Dynamometer (DYN) - is a mechanical device that measures the pounds of force that a muscle exerts, Grip - a device that measures grip strength, and finger flexors digit 2 and 3 (FF d2-3). These measures are the amount of lbs of force exert. The higher number is the highest exerted out of 3 tries.
baseline and at 8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Merz North America, Inc.

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: David M Simpson, MD, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
  • Principal Investigator: Steven Frucht, MD, NYU Langone Health

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 27, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 27, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 26, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 4, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 8, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 11, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 19, 2023

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • GCO 13-1679

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dystonia

Clinical Trials on Placebo

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings