A Safety and Efficacy Study of Different Injections Volumes of Botulinum Toxin Type A, Azzalure, in the Glabellar Lines
A Randomized, Evaluator-blinded, Comparative Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Different Injection Volumes of Botulinum Toxin Type A, Azzalure, in the Glabellar Lines
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Clarification regarding injection volumes for the different study groups:
Subjects will be randomized to Group A or Group B (1:1).
- Group A: 0,63ml NaCl will be used to reconstitute toxin in the vial. 0,05mL will be injected (equal to a dose of 10s.U.)
- Group B: 1,25ml NaCl will be used to reconstitute toxin in the vial. 0,1 mL will be injected (equal to a dose of 10s.U.).
The two different reconstitution volumes (each containing a dose of 10s.U. botulinum toxin A) will be compared as described under objectives.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Phase 4
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Gothenburg, Sweden
- Göteborgs Plastikkirurgiska Center
-
Uppsala, Sweden
- Anna Neuromuskulär Konsult
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Key Inclusion Criteria:
- Women, 18 to 64 years of age
- Subjects seeking treatment for moderate to severe glabellar lines when the severity of these lines has an important psychological impact on the subject, as determined by the investigator.
Key Exclusion Criteria:
- Subjects previously treated with any botulinum toxin product.
- Pregnant or breast feeding women or women intending to get pregnant in the next 12 months.
- Subjects with signs and symptoms of eyelid or brow ptosis or signs of compensatory frontalis muscle activity, as judged by the investigator.
- Subjects with clinical or subclinical neuromuscular junctional disorders (e.g. myasthenia gravis, Lambert Eaton syndrome or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis) or a history of dysphagia or aspiration.
- Subjects with previous or current diagnosis of Bell's paresis.
- Subjects with known bleeding disorders or subjects who are taking thrombolytics or anticoagulants.
- Subjects who are taking anticholinergics or aminoglycoside antibiotics.
- Any prior surgery in the facial area that, in the opinion of the investigator, may interfere with the results.
- Subjects treated with fillers, HA filler or permanent filler, in the upper face one year or less from screening.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: DOUBLE
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Azzalure 10 Speywood units/injection
Azzalure (botulinum toxin type A), powder for solution for injection, Total dose 50 s.U (5 x 10s.U)
|
Other Names:
|
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Azzalure, 10 Speywood units/injection
Azzalure (botulinum toxin type A), powder for solution for injection, Total dose 50 s.U (5 x 10s.U)
|
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Assessment of severity of glabellar lines at rest and at maximum frown using the Merz Aesthetic 5-point scale. (However no primary outcome measure is defined in the study protocol)
Time Frame: Month 1
|
To evaluate effect on glabellar line severity
|
Month 1
|
Other Outcome Measures
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Assessment of severity of glabellar lines at rest and at maximum frown using the Merz Aesthetic 5-point scale
Time Frame: Day 0, 1, 3, 7, 14, month 3, 4 and 6
|
To evaluate effect on glabellar line severity
|
Day 0, 1, 3, 7, 14, month 3, 4 and 6
|
|
Adverse Event reporting
Time Frame: Day 0-180
|
To evaluate long term safety throughout the study period
|
Day 0-180
|
|
Compound Muscle Action Potential (CMAP) reduction as percent of baseline CMAP measurement
Time Frame: Day 0, 1, 3, 7, month 1, 3 and 6
|
To evaluate the Compound Muscle Action Potential using electroneurography
|
Day 0, 1, 3, 7, month 1, 3 and 6
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Anna Rostedt Punga, MD, Anna Neuromuskulär Konsult
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ESTIMATE)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 05PF1311
- 2013-004646-42 (EUDRACT_NUMBER)
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.