Low Glycemic Load Diet in Patients With Stage I-III Colon Cancer

July 19, 2018 updated by: Case Comprehensive Cancer Center

A Pilot Study to Determine the Feasibility of a Low Glycemic Load Diet in Patients With Stage I-III Colon Cancer

This pilot clinical trial studies the feasibility of a low glycemic load diet in patients with stage I-III colon cancer. A low glycemic load diet includes foods that have low scores on the glycemic index. The glycemic index is a scale that measures how much a certain carbohydrate causes a person's blood sugar to rise. A low glycemic load diet may help decrease the chance of cancer coming back and improve the survival in patients with colon cancer.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To determine the feasibility of following a low or medium glycemic load diet in patients with stage I-III (local-regional) colon cancer.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To determine patient-reported acceptability of diet. II. To determine nutritionist resources utilized. III. To evaluate the effect of lowering dietary glycemic load on body mass index (BMI), lipid metabolism and pro-oncogenic intermediaries of cellular metabolism.

OUTLINE: Patients are sequentially enrolled in 1 of 4 possible cohorts as needed based on the feasibility of the prior cohort.

COHORT 1: Patients follow a low glycemic load diet with standard dietary intervention (contact with nutritionist in person every 2 weeks with phone contact on the alternating weeks) for 12 weeks.

COHORT 2: Patients follow a low glycemic load diet with intensified dietary intervention (contact with nutritionist in person every week) for 12 weeks.

COHORT 3: Patients follow a medium glycemic load diet with standard dietary intervention for 12 weeks.

COHORT 4: Patients follow a medium glycemic load diet with intensified dietary intervention for 12 weeks.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
18

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44106-5065
        • Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44106
        • MetroHealth Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients must have stage I-III colon or rectal cancer and have undergone definitive therapy; definitive therapy may have included surgery alone, or surgery plus neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant therapy
  • Patients must regularly consume a diet with a glycemic load > 150 as estimated through the 3 day food recall
  • Patients must readily be available for a 3 month period and agree to participate in regular dietary adherence assessments (surveys and phone interviews)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current participation in an intervention targeting diet or exercise

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Cohort 1: Low glycemic load with standard diet
Patients follow a low glycemic load diet with a standard dietary intervention for 12 weeks.
Other: questionnaire administration
Ancillary studies including three day food record, twenty-four hour dietary recall, and a food acceptability questionnaire.
Behavioral: Standard Dietary Intervention
Participants will be contacted by a nutritionist, in person every 2 weeks with phone contact on the alternating weeks. At the initial visit, each participant will be given verbal and written patient education materials, including low glycemic load diet recipes, meal plans, food preparation, and grocery shopping information. Individual instruction will be tailored to their baseline dietary preferences (e.g. vegan, allergies, etc).
Behavioral: Low glycemic load
Experimental: Cohort 2: Low glycemic load with intensified diet
Patients follow a low glycemic load diet with intensified dietary intervention for 12 weeks.
Other: laboratory biomarker analysis
Correlative studies
Other: questionnaire administration
Ancillary studies including three day food record, twenty-four hour dietary recall, and a food acceptability questionnaire.
Behavioral: Low glycemic load
Behavioral: Intensified Dietary Intervention
Patients will be contacted weekly, in person, by a nutritionist . Participants will take part in a cooking demonstration at the time of their initial visit. The demonstration will be hands-on and participants will be able to sample foods and recipes. In addition to grocery shopping information, participants will be accompanied by a nutritionist to their local grocery store to practice new shopping habits for their target dietary glycemic load. Each participant will also receive weekly random phone calls to assess his or her progress.
Active Comparator: Cohort 3: Medium glycemic load with standard diet
Patients follow a medium glycemic load diet with standard dietary intervention for 12 weeks.
Other: laboratory biomarker analysis
Correlative studies
Other: questionnaire administration
Ancillary studies including three day food record, twenty-four hour dietary recall, and a food acceptability questionnaire.
Behavioral: Standard Dietary Intervention
Participants will be contacted by a nutritionist, in person every 2 weeks with phone contact on the alternating weeks. At the initial visit, each participant will be given verbal and written patient education materials, including low glycemic load diet recipes, meal plans, food preparation, and grocery shopping information. Individual instruction will be tailored to their baseline dietary preferences (e.g. vegan, allergies, etc).
Behavioral: Medium Glycemic Load
Active Comparator: Cohort 4: Medium glycemic load with intensified diet
Patients follow a medium glycemic load diet with intensified dietary intervention for 12 weeks.
Other: laboratory biomarker analysis
Correlative studies
Other: questionnaire administration
Ancillary studies including three day food record, twenty-four hour dietary recall, and a food acceptability questionnaire.
Behavioral: Intensified Dietary Intervention
Patients will be contacted weekly, in person, by a nutritionist . Participants will take part in a cooking demonstration at the time of their initial visit. The demonstration will be hands-on and participants will be able to sample foods and recipes. In addition to grocery shopping information, participants will be accompanied by a nutritionist to their local grocery store to practice new shopping habits for their target dietary glycemic load. Each participant will also receive weekly random phone calls to assess his or her progress.
Behavioral: Medium Glycemic Load

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Individual patient compliance, defined by following assigned target glycemic load index >= 75% of the time between weeks 4 and 12
Time Frame: Up to week 12
This compliance rate will be determined through conducting a 24 hour telephone recall, every 2 weeks at random and calculating the glycemic load. For each dose cohort, the number and percentage of patients who are compliant will be summarized, with 90% confidence interval that accounts for the two-stage design.
Up to week 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Food acceptability score
Time Frame: Up to 12 weeks
Results of the acceptability survey will be tabulated and described (the questions use a 7 point likert scale), separately for each cohort.
Up to 12 weeks
Hours of nutritionist time per week
Time Frame: Up to 12 weeks
The median number of hours will be calculated based on time spent with each patient, separately for each cohort.
Up to 12 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in serum levels of glycosylated hemoglobin
Time Frame: Baseline to up to 12 weeks
Separately for each cohort, serum levels will be summarized descriptively and graphically across the follow-up period. Paired t-tests or Wilcoxon signed rank tests will be used to compare baseline vs. post-intervention levels of all biomarkers. Changes in biomarkers will be correlated with dietary glycemic index (GI) using Pearson or Spearman correlation coefficients, across the follow-up period.
Baseline to up to 12 weeks
Change in BMI
Time Frame: Baseline to up to 12 weeks
Separately for each cohort, BMI levels will be summarized descriptively and graphically across the follow-up period.
Baseline to up to 12 weeks
Change in serum levels of markers of lipid metabolism
Time Frame: Baseline to up to 12 weeks
Separately for each cohort, serum levels will be summarized descriptively and graphically across the follow-up period. Paired t-tests or Wilcoxon signed rank tests will be used to compare baseline vs. post-intervention levels of all biomarkers. Changes in biomarkers will be correlated with dietary GI using Pearson or Spearman correlation coefficients, across the follow-up period.
Baseline to up to 12 weeks
Change in serum levels of proteins affected by carbohydrate metabolism
Time Frame: Baseline to up to 12 weeks
Separately for each cohort, serum levels will be summarized descriptively and graphically across the follow-up period. Paired t-tests or Wilcoxon signed rank tests will be used to compare baseline vs. post-intervention levels of all biomarkers. Changes in biomarkers will be correlated with dietary GI using Pearson or Spearman correlation coefficients, across the follow-up period.
Baseline to up to 12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Case Comprehensive Cancer Center

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Cancer Institute (NCI)

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Michelle Treasure, MD, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 16, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 14, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 10, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 17, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 30, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 2, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 20, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 19, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CASE7213 (Other Identifier: Case Comprehensive Cancer Center)
  • P30CA043703 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
  • NCI-2014-00831 (Registry Identifier: CTRP (Clinical Trial Reporting Program))

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings