Stroke Volume Analysis During Aortic Valve Replacement Trial (standart)

August 7, 2014 updated by: Michael Sander, Charite University, Berlin, Germany
Compromised peripheral tissue oxygenation during surgery may lead to worse patient outcome, mainly due to post-operative infections or heart failure. Insufficient stroke volume and/or cardiac output due to hypovolemia or cardiac defects play a central role in causing poor peripheral tissue oxygenation. In order to assess stroke volume, there are numerous invasive and non-invasive methods available. Up to the present date it is unknown, if these methods may by used interchangeably in patients with severe cardiac defects like aortic stenosis.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
68

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.

Study Locations

  • Germany
      • Berlin, Germany, 10117
        • Recruiting
        • Charité Universitätsmedizin Berin
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Felix Balzer, MD
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Sascha Treskatsch, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Marit Habicher, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Viktor Mezger, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Cardiac surgery at a university hospital

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • scheduled transcatheter aortic valve implantation
  • signed patient consent form
  • aged 18 or older by time of surgery
  • no participation in other clinical trials

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pregnant or breast-feeding women
  • emergency surgery

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Hemodynamic optimisation
No hemodynamic optimisation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Measurement of stroke volume (ml) before TAVI (transcatheter aortic valve implantation) by means of (1) FloTrac, (2) transesophageal doppler echocardiography, (3) pulmonary thermodilution via pulmonary artery catheter
Time Frame: Before Surgery; participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 weeks
Before Surgery; participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 weeks
Measurement of cardiac output (l/min) before TAVI (transcatheter aortic valve implantation) by means of (1) FloTrac, (2) transesophageal doppler echocardiography, (3) pulmonary thermodilution via pulmonary artery catheter
Time Frame: Before Surgery; participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 weeks
Before Surgery; participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Measurement of stroke volume (ml) after TAVI (transcatheter aortic valve implantation) by means of (1) FloTrac, (2) transesophageal doppler echocardiography and (3) pulmonary thermodilution via pulmonary artery catheter
Time Frame: After surgery; participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 weeks
After surgery; participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 weeks
Accordance of stroke volume and cardiac output measurements assessed by (1) FloTrac, (2) transesophageal doppler echocardiography and (3) pulmonary thermodilution via pulmonary artery catheter AFTER ADMINISTRATION OF FLUID BOLUS
Time Frame: Before and after surgery; participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 weeks
Before and after surgery; participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 weeks
Accordance of stroke volume and cardiac output measurements assessed by two of the mentioned methods [i.e. (1) FloTrac, (2) transesophageal doppler echocardiography and (3) pulmonary thermodilution via pulmonary artery catheter]
Time Frame: Before and after Surgery; participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 weeks
Before and after Surgery; participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 weeks
Measurement of cardiac output (l/min) after TAVI (transcatheter aortic valve implantation) by means of (1) FloTrac, (2) transesophageal doppler echocardiography and (3) pulmonary thermodilution via pulmonary artery catheter
Time Frame: After Surgery; participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 weeks
After Surgery; participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
oxygen delivery (ml)
Time Frame: Before and after surgery; participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 weeks
Before and after surgery; participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 weeks
image quality of echocardiography
Time Frame: Before and after surgery; participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 weeks
Before and after surgery; participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 weeks
Length of stay on ICU
Time Frame: participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 weeks
participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 weeks
Cumulative rate of infections
Time Frame: after surgery; participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 weeks
after surgery; participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 weeks
incidence of delirium after surgery
Time Frame: after surgery; participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 weeks
after surgery; participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 weeks
dosage of inotropic medication (mg/d)
Time Frame: after surgery; participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 weeks
after surgery; participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 weeks
length of hospital stay
Time Frame: after surgery; participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 weeks
after surgery; participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 weeks
incidence of stroke
Time Frame: after surgery; participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 weeks
after surgery; participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 2 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Charite University, Berlin, Germany

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Michael Sander, MD, Charite University, Berlin, Germany

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 20, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 2, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 5, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 8, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 7, 2014

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • EA1/060/13

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings