Effects of School Gardens on Children's Diet, Nutritional Knowledge, Etc. (HGHY)
Healthy Gardens, Healthy Youth (HGHY): A People's Garden School Pilot Program
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Arkansas
-
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States, 72204
- Schools in Arkansas
-
-
Iowa
-
Osceola, Iowa, United States, 50213
- Schools in Iowa
-
-
New York
-
Ithaca, New York, United States, 14850
- Schools in New York State
-
-
Washington
-
Tacoma, Washington, United States, 98418
- Schools in Washington State
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Schools had at least 50% of enrolled children qualifying for free + reduced price meals (FRPM)
- Schools did not already have a school garden.
Exclusion Criteria:
none.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: garden intervention
Schools assigned to the garden intervention receive raised bed garden kits and access to a toolkit of garden-based curriculum
|
The intervention includes raised bed garden kits for participating classes as well as access to garden-based curriculum.
|
|
No Intervention: Control
Wait-list control (no garden intervention + lessons) until end of the study.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
change in fruit + vegetable intake at school
Time Frame: change from baseline to follow-up at 6, 12, 18 months
|
Children's lunch trays are photographed before and after lunch for 3 days at each wave of data collection.
Digital Food Image Analysis software computes grams of fruit and grams of vegetables consumed for each pair of lunch tray photos.
|
change from baseline to follow-up at 6, 12, 18 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Garden Intervention Fidelity
Time Frame: At 3 garden intervention time points -- 6, 12, 18 months after baseline
|
fruit + vegetables planted, harvested; methods of fruit and vegetable distribution; and garden-based lessons delivered to the class are measures at each wave of data collection from Fall 2011 to Spring 2013.
|
At 3 garden intervention time points -- 6, 12, 18 months after baseline
|
|
change fruit & vegetable consumption at home
Time Frame: change from baseline (Fall 2011) to follow-up at 6 months, 12 months, 18 months.
|
change from baseline (Fall 2011) to follow-up at 6 months, 12 months, 18 months.
|
|
|
change in Nutritional Knowledge
Time Frame: change from baseline to follow-up at 6, 12, 18 months
|
In the classroom, children complete a 7-item multiple choice questionnaire developed by the Healthy Gardens, Healthy Youth curriculum development team.
The questionnaire includes items about plant science (e.g., Which part of the plant uses the sun's energy to make food?
root, stem, leaf, flower) and nutrition (e.g., Which nutrient supplies our bodies with energy?
fiber, carbohydrates, water, vitamins).
Data represent the number of correct answers.
|
change from baseline to follow-up at 6, 12, 18 months
|
|
change in Science Technology Engineering Math (STEM) self efficacy
Time Frame: change from baseline (Fall 2011) to follow-up at 6, 12, 18 months.
|
In the classroom, children complete a 15-item questionnaire, derived from the Science Process Skills Inventory (SPSI) (Arnold & Bourdeau, 2009) and the Iowa 4-H Science Youth Self-Assessment (Staker, 2011).
Items include, for example: "I can do an experiment to answer a question" and "I can develop a plan for a good garden I want to plant" with response options "Disagree."
"Not Sure." or "Agree" denoted 1, 2, or 3 respectively.
The STEM self-efficacy score range is thus 15-45, with higher scores indicating that participant has stronger positive beliefs in their abilities to use STEM to solve problems.
|
change from baseline (Fall 2011) to follow-up at 6, 12, 18 months.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: Nancy M Wells, PhD, Cornell University
Publications and helpful links
Helpful Links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- CN-CGP-11-0047
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.