A Study to Investigate the Safety of the Drugs Topiramate and Levetiracetam in Treating Children Recently Diagnosed With Epilepsy

April 25, 2025 updated by: Janssen Research & Development, LLC

A Randomized, Active-Controlled, Open-Label, Flexible-Dose Study to Assess the Safety and Tolerability of Topiramate as Monotherapy Compared With Levetiracetam as Monotherapy in Pediatric Subjects With New or Recent-Onset Epilepsy

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety of topiramate monotherapy compared with levetiracetam another standard antiepileptic drug (AED), as monotherapy for new-onset or recent-onset epilepsy (seizure disorder) on pediatric growth and maturation, bone mineralization, and kidney stone formation in children aged 2 to 15 years.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This is a randomized (study medication assigned to participants by chance), open-label, multi-centric (conducted in more than one center) and 2-arm flexible-dose monotherapy study of topiramate compared with 1 another AED (levetiracetam) in pediatric participants with epilepsy. The total study duration will be up to of 1 year and 2 months per participant. The study consists of 3 parts: Screening (that is, up to 35 days before study commences on Day 1); Treatment (1 year) and post-treatment (30 days). Safety will primarily be evaluated by percentage of participants with kidney stones and change from baseline in bone mineral density at Month 12.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
63

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Argentina
      • Buenos Aires, Argentina
      • Cordoba, Argentina
  • Australia
      • Queensland, Australia
  • Austria
      • Graz, Austria
  • Belgium
      • Leuven, Belgium
      • Namur, Belgium
  • Canada
    • Saskatchewan
      • Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
  • France
      • Brest, France
      • Bron, France
      • Paris, France
      • Toulouse, France
  • Germany
      • Munchen, Germany
      • Tübingen, Germany
  • Hungary
      • Balassagyarmat, Hungary
      • Budapest N/a, Hungary
      • Debrecen, Hungary
      • Veszprém, Hungary
  • Philippines
      • Cebu, Philippines
      • Manila, Philippines
  • Poland
      • Krakow, Poland
      • Poznan, Poland
      • Warsaw, Poland
      • Warszawa, Poland
  • Russian Federation
      • Saint Petersburg, Russian Federation
      • Ulyanovsk, Russian Federation
  • South Africa
      • Durban, South Africa
  • Taiwan
      • Kaohsiung, Taiwan
      • New Taipei City, Taiwan
      • Taichung, Taiwan
      • Taipei, Taiwan
  • United States
    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States
    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States
    • Florida
      • Gulf Breeze, Florida, United States
      • Orlando, Florida, United States
      • Tampa, Florida, United States
      • Wellington, Florida, United States
    • Kentucky
      • Louisville, Kentucky, United States
    • Ohio
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States
      • Toledo, Ohio, United States
    • Oregon
      • Portland, Oregon, United States
    • Texas
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States
      • Temple, Texas, United States

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

2 years to 15 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participant with a clinical diagnosis of new-onset or recent-onset epilepsy characterized by partial-onset seizures (POS) (with or without secondary generalization) or primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures (PGTCS) in accordance with criteria of the International League Against Epilepsy. The epilepsy diagnosis must be within the previous 2 years before screening
  • Caregivers (parents or legally acceptable representatives) of the participant must be able to accurately maintain the participant take-home record and seizure diary
  • At screening, participant must have weight and height values within the 5th to 95th percentile for chronological age (based on standard Child Height and Weight Charts from the Centers for Disease Control [CDC])
  • Participant must never have been treated for epilepsy (treatment-naïve) or have been treated with no more than 1 standard antiepileptic drug (AED) if temporary or urgent AED use was necessary. Previous AED exposure must not exceed either of the following: 1.)Thirty-one days immediately preceding enrollment, or 2.)A total of 6 months of previous AED exposure in the past if the AED has been discontinued for at least 1 year prior to enrollment
  • Parents (or legally acceptable representatives) of the participant must sign an informed consent/permission document, indicating that they understand the purpose of and procedures required for the study and are willing to give permission for their child to participate in the study. Participant 7 years of age and older, capable of understanding the nature of the study, must provide assent for their participation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participant has a surgically implanted and functioning vagus nerve stimulator
  • Participant has a history of seizures as a result of a correctable medical condition, such as metabolic disturbance, toxic exposure, neoplasm, or active infection within 2 weeks prior to the first day of Screening
  • Participant has had uncontrolled seizures while previously taking either topiramate or levetiracetam
  • Participant has a history of non-epileptic seizures within 2 weeks prior to the first day of Screening
  • Participant has myoclonic or absence seizures

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Topiramate
Topiramate weight based dosing for participants 2 to less than (<) 10 years of age not to exceed 350 mg/day (milligram per day), as tolerated; not to exceed 400 mg/day in participants 10-15 years of age, as tolerated.
Drug: Topiramate
Topiramate weight based dosing for participants 2 to <10 years of age not to exceed 350 mg/day, as tolerated; not to exceed 400 mg/day in participants 10-15 years of age, as tolerated.
Active Comparator: Levetiracetam
Levetiracetam weight based dosing for all participants 2-15 years of age, not to exceed 60 milligram per kilogram per day (mg/kg/day), as tolerated. The maximum recommended daily dosage is 3,000 milligram (mg).
Drug: Levetiracetam
Levetiracetam weight based dosing for all participants 2-15 years of age, not to exceed 60 mg/kg/day, as tolerated. The maximum recommended daily dosage is 3,000 mg.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Weight Z-score up to Month 1
Time Frame: Baseline up to Month 1
The Z-Score indicates how many standard deviations (SD) a participant has from the population normal values. The body weight z-scores were designed to take into account the amount of weight gain that was expected due to normal growth in children and adolescents. Body weight data were converted to Z-scores using the Statistical Analysis System (SAS) programs provided by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) for the calculation of the 2000 CDC growth charts. The mean (SD) change in Z scores from baseline up to Month 1 for the total safety population for all age cohorts combined were presented. A negative Z-score indicates values lower than the mean while a positive Z-score indicates values higher than the mean.
Baseline up to Month 1
Change From Baseline in Weight Z-score up to Month 3
Time Frame: Baseline up to Month 3
The Z-Score indicates how many SD a participant has from the population normal values. The body weight z-scores were designed to take into account the amount of weight gain that was expected due to normal growth in children and adolescents. Body weight data were converted to Z-scores using the SAS programs provided by the CDC for the calculation of the 2000 CDC growth charts. The mean (SD) change in Z scores from baseline up to Month 3 for the total safety population for all age cohorts combined were presented. A negative Z-score indicates values lower than the mean while a positive Z-score indicates values higher than the mean.
Baseline up to Month 3
Change From Baseline in Weight Z-score up to Month 6
Time Frame: Baseline up to Month 6
The Z-Score indicates how many SD a participant has from the population normal values. The body weight z-scores were designed to take into account the amount of weight gain that was expected due to normal growth in children and adolescents. Body weight data were converted to Z-scores using the SAS programs provided by the CDC for the calculation of the 2000 CDC growth charts. The mean (SD) change in Z scores from baseline up to Month 6 for the total safety population for all age cohorts combined were presented. A negative Z-score indicates values lower than the mean while a positive Z-score indicates values higher than the mean.
Baseline up to Month 6
Change From Baseline in Weight Z-score up to Month 9
Time Frame: Baseline up to Month 9
The Z-Score indicates how many SD a participant has from the population normal values. The body weight z-scores were designed to take into account the amount of weight gain that was expected due to normal growth in children and adolescents. Body weight data were converted to Z-scores using the SAS programs provided by the CDC for the calculation of the 2000 CDC growth charts. The mean (SD) change in Z scores from baseline up yo Month 9 for the total safety population for all age cohorts combined were presented. A negative Z-score indicates values lower than the mean while a positive Z-score indicates values higher than the mean.
Baseline up to Month 9
Change From Baseline in Weight Z-score up to Month 12
Time Frame: Baseline up to Month 12
The Z-Score indicates how many SD a participant has from the population normal values. The body weight z-scores were designed to take into account the amount of weight gain that was expected due to normal growth in children and adolescents. Body weight data were converted to Z-scores using the SAS programs provided by the CDC for the calculation of the 2000 CDC growth charts. The mean (SD) change in Z scores from baseline to Month 12 for the total safety population for all age cohorts combined were presented. A negative Z-score indicates values lower than the mean while a positive Z-score indicates values higher than the mean.
Baseline up to Month 12
Change From Baseline in Height Z-score up to Month 1
Time Frame: Baseline up to Month 1
Z-Score was a statistical measure to evaluate how a single data point compares to a standard. It described whether a mean was above or below the standard and how unusual the measurement is with range from minus (-) 3 to plus (+) 3; 0 equal to (=) same mean, greater than (>) 0 a greater mean, and less than (<) 0 a lesser mean than the standard. Growth parameters were compared to a standard defined by CDC growth charts. The mean (SD) change in Z scores from baseline up to Month 1 for the total safety population for all age cohorts combined were presented. A negative Z-score indicates values lower than the mean while a positive Z-score indicates values higher than the mean.
Baseline up to Month 1
Change From Baseline in Height Z-score up to Month 3
Time Frame: Baseline up to Month 3
Z-Score was a statistical measure to evaluate how a single data point compares to a standard. It described whether a mean was above or below the standard and how unusual the measurement is with range from -3 to +3; 0 =same mean, >0 a greater mean, and <0 a lesser mean than the standard. Growth parameters were compared to a standard defined by CDC growth charts. The mean (SD) change in Z scores from baseline up to Month 3 for the total safety population for all age cohorts combined were presented. A negative Z-score indicates values lower than the mean while a positive Z-score indicates values higher than the mean.
Baseline up to Month 3
Change From Baseline in Height Z-score up to Month 6
Time Frame: Baseline up to Month 6
Z-Score was a statistical measure to evaluate how a single data point compares to a standard. It described whether a mean was above or below the standard and how unusual the measurement is with range from -3 to +3; 0 =same mean, >0 a greater mean, and <0 a lesser mean than the standard. Growth parameters were compared to a standard defined by CDC growth charts. The mean (SD) change in Z scores from baseline up to Month 6 for the total safety population for all age cohorts combined were presented.
Baseline up to Month 6
Change From Baseline in Height Z-score up to Month 9
Time Frame: Baseline up to Month 9
Z-Score was a statistical measure to evaluate how a single data point compares to a standard. It described whether a mean was above or below the standard and how unusual the measurement is with range from -3 to +3; 0 =same mean, >0 a greater mean, and <0 a lesser mean than the standard. Growth parameters were compared to a standard defined by CDC growth charts. The mean (SD) change in Z scores from baseline up to Month 9 for the total safety population for all age cohorts combined were presented. A negative Z-score indicates values lower than the mean while a positive Z-score indicates values higher than the mean.
Baseline up to Month 9
Change From Baseline in Height Z-score up to Month 12
Time Frame: Baseline up to Month 12
Z-Score was a statistical measure to evaluate how a single data point compares to a standard. It described whether a mean was above or below the standard and how unusual the measurement is with range from -3 to +3; 0 =same mean, >0 a greater mean, and <0 a lesser mean than the standard. Growth parameters were compared to a standard defined by CDC growth charts. The mean (SD) change in Z scores from baseline up to Month 12 for the total safety population for all age cohorts combined were presented. A negative Z-score indicates values lower than the mean while a positive Z-score indicates values higher than the mean.
Baseline up to Month 12
Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Density (BMD) Z-score up to Month 6
Time Frame: Baseline up to Month 6
The BMD was measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) for the posterior-anterior lumbar spine (L1_L4) and total body less head area. The Z-Score is the number of standard deviations a participant's BMD differs from the average BMD of their age, sex and ethnicity. Positive scores indicate BMD above the mean; positive values are "best values" and negative values are "worst values". Positive changes from baseline indicated an improvement in condition.
Baseline up to Month 6
Change From Baseline in BMD Z-score up to Month 12
Time Frame: Baseline up to Month 12
The BMD was measured by DEXA for the posterior-anterior lumbar spine (L1_L4) and total body less head area. The Z-Score is the number of standard deviations a participant's BMD differs from the average BMD of their age, sex and ethnicity. Positive scores indicate BMD above the mean; positive values are "best values" and negative values are "worst values". Positive changes from baseline indicated an improvement in condition.
Baseline up to Month 12
Change From Baseline in Bone Mineral Content (BMC)-Z Score up to Month 6
Time Frame: Baseline up to Month 6
The BMC is an estimate of the amount of mineral (such as calcium) in the bone, which was assessed by DEXA scan for the posterior-anterior lumbar spine (L1_L4) and total body less head area. Positive changes from baseline indicated an improvement in condition.
Baseline up to Month 6
Change From Baseline in BMC-Z Score up to Month 12
Time Frame: Baseline up to Month 12
The BMC is an estimate of the amount of mineral (such as calcium) in the bone, which was assessed by DEXA scan for the posterior-anterior lumbar spine (L1_L4) and total body less head area. Positive changes from baseline indicated an improvement in condition.
Baseline up to Month 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)
Time Frame: Up to Day 390
An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a subject who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. TEAE are defined as AEs with onset during the treatment period or that are a consequence of a pre-existing condition that has worsened since baseline.
Up to Day 390
Percentage of Participants With Kidney Stones
Time Frame: Up to Day 390
Percentage of participants with kidney stones were reported.
Up to Day 390

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Janssen Research & Development, LLC

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial, Janssen Research & Development, LLC

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 6, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 30, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 24, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 24, 2014

First Posted (Estimated)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 28, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 29, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 25, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CR104425
  • TOPMATEPY4067 (Other Identifier: Janssen Research & Development, LLC)
  • 2012-001552-19 (EudraCT Number)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Epilepsy

Clinical Trials on Topiramate

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings