Novel Candidate Genes for Treatment Response to Antipsychotics in Schizophrenia (GEXANT)

January 13, 2020 updated by: Benedicto Crespo-Facorro, Fundación Marques de Valdecilla

Novel Candidate Genes for Treatment Response to Antipsychotics in Schizophrenia: Evidence From Pharmacogenetics in the Light of Personalized Medicine

Schizophrenia is a severe and chronic mental disorder. The lifetime risk of schizophrenia is around 1%. Its course is chronic and frequently disabling. The keystone of schizophrenia treatment is antipsychotic medications. The use of antipsychotics represents a huge public health and economic burden to society. Most of antipsychotics drugs are "metoo" drugs, directly or indirectly replicating dopamine D2 receptor blockade. Pharmaceutical companies have aimed to produce drugs with a general indication for all patients with schizophrenia with a "one-size-fits-all" strategy with no targeting or stratification. Second generation antipsychotics partly improve positive symptoms and are quite often associated to weight gain, metabolic changes and increased risk of cardiovascular diseases. Antipsychotics only achieve a certain degree of clinical improvement in a percentage of patients (45%) and 30% of the patients are treatment resistant. In light of the current deadlock, there is an urgent need to expand the horizon of pharmacological research by elucidating new mechanisms related to antipsychotic actions. An alternative strategy is the comparison of gene expression profiles in drug-naive accurately ill patients before and after antipsychotic treatment has been initiated. Our research group has a great experience in the field and has been working on this hypothesis in the latest years. We propose a continuation project to thoroughly explore the clinical implications (clinical response to antipsychotic drugs or emergence of metabolic side effects) of the variants in gene expression we have recently described in schizophrenia patients. This project takes advantage of an exceptional (regarding to the detailed knowledge of clinical outcome and side effect profile) longitudinal cohort of drug-naive patients with schizophrenia who had been followed up for three years at the University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
200

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Spain
    • Cantabria
      • Santander, Cantabria, Spain, 39008
        • Recruiting
        • University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

15 years to 60 years (ADULT, CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Individuals included in the First Episode Psychosis Clinical Program (PAFIP) at the University Hospital Marqués de Valdecilla (Santander - Cantabria).

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients followed up for 3 years in the First Episode Psychosis Clinical Program (PAFIP).
  • 15-60 years.
  • Living in the catchment area.
  • Experiencing their first episode of psychosis.
  • No prior treatment with antipsychotic medication or, if previously treated, a total life time of adequate antipsychotic treatment of less than 6 weeks.
  • Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) criteria for brief psychotic disorder, schizophreniform disorder, schizophrenia, or schizoaffective disorder.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Meeting DSM-IV criteria for drug dependence.
  • Meeting DSM-IV criteria for mental retardation.
  • Having a history of neurological disease or head injury.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Controls
Healthy subjects without psychotic disorder.
Drug-naive patients
Drug-naive (never medicated) schizophrenia patients.
Patients responder to treatment
Patients with a good clinical response to treatment (define by a marked improvement of positive symptoms) at 3 months and at 1 year.
Patients non-responder to treatment
Patients with a poor clinical response to treatment at 3 months and at 1 year.
Patients with metabolic side effects
Patients with metabolic side effects associated to treatment.
Patients with non-metabolic side effects
Patients with no metabolic side effects associated to treatment.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical improvement.
Time Frame: 1 year.
Changes in the total scores of the Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms (SAPS) and Negative Symptoms (SANS), the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) and the severity scale of the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale.
1 year.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in metabolic parameters.
Time Frame: 1 year.
This parameters are Cholesterol, Triglycerides, Glucose and Homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) index.
1 year.
Effect of gender and cannabis use in the profile of gene expression associated with schizophrenia.
Time Frame: 1 year.
1 year.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Fundación Marques de Valdecilla

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental
Instituto de Investigación Marqués de Valdecilla

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2015

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2020

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 29, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 30, 2014

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
July 31, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 14, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 13, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • GEXANT

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Schizophrenia

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings