Fast-Fail Trials in Mood and Anxiety Spectrum Disorders; Kappa Opioid Receptor Phase 2a (FASTMAS_Kor2)

December 14, 2018 updated by: Duke University

A Phase 2a Study to Evaluate the Kappa Opioid Receptor As a Target for the Treatment of Mood and Anxiety Spectrum Disorders by Evaluation of Whether CERC-501 Engages Key Neural Circuitry Related to the Hedonic Response

The available treatment for patients with mood and anxiety disorders have significant limitations (Rush, 2007; Denys and de Geus, 2005). There is a need to develop new treatments for people with these disorders. Many research studies carried out in animals and a few preliminary studies carried out in humans suggest that medications which block kappa opioid receptors (KOR) have potential for being effective new treatments for patients with mood and anxiety spectrum disorders. These medications have shown particular promise for improving one important type of difficulty experienced by many patients who suffer from mood and anxiety spectrum disorders referred to as anhedonia, which is an impairment in reward-related function. In this study we will test the hypothesis that KOR antagonism is a promising means of improving anhedonia in patients with mood and anxiety spectrum disorders. We will do so by evaluating whether we can establish Proof of Concept (POC) that a relatively selective KOR antagonist, CERC-501 (formerly known as LY2456302), engages neural circuits involved in mediating reward-related function in patients with mood and anxiety spectrum disorders with anhedonia. We are attempting to establish POC in this study in order to determine whether there is a sufficient basis for pursuing future work evaluating whether KOR antagonism has therapeutic effects on clinical and behavioral measures of reward-related functioning.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

FAST-MAS addresses an important problem and critical barrier to progress in Mood and Anxiety Spectrum Disorders and if the aims of the project are achieved, FAST-MAS could shift scientific knowledge, technical capacity, and clinical practice in a positive direction.

The Mood and Anxiety Spectrum disorders are both extremely common and associated with significant morbidity and mortality and, as such, represent an important public health problem in the United States.

The mood disorders include the following diagnostic entities: major depressive disorder (MDD), bipolar disorder (including subtypes of mania, mixed state, and depressed, as well as types I and II), and dysthymic disorder. Available epidemiologic data suggest that the prevalence of these mood disorders is extremely high among adults in the United States, approaching 10%. Among the mood disorders, MDD has high lifetime prevalence, with recent estimates up to 16%. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), MDD is currently the leading cause of disability with the greatest burden of illness in developed countries and the third most common cause of disability worldwide. MDD is life shortening due to both suicide and its association with increased mortality from other medical conditions. It is also a highly recurrent condition with between 50% and 75% of persons diagnosed with MDD experiencing more than one episode. Bipolar Disorder is also a highly recurrent condition. The lifetime prevalence of bipolar disorder has been estimated to be approximately 3.4% in the World Health Survey Initiative. Approximately 60% of affected individuals experience severe or very severe role impairment based on the Sheehan Disability Scale and, like MDD, bipolar disorder is associated with significant suicide risk.

The anxiety disorders are also very common and associated with significant adverse impact on affected individuals and society. These disorders include the following diagnostic entities: generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), panic disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, social phobia, specific phobias, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). As a group, these conditions affect approximately 18% of adults in a given year and they are associated with significant co-morbidities and adverse consequences. Of the anxiety disorders, GAD appears to be associated with the greatest per patient cost and disability with a degree of disability comparable to that of MDD and comparable to chronic medical conditions such as arthritis, diabetes, and peptic ulcer disease. It affects approximately 6.8 million adults in the U.S. and is a highly chronic condition. Panic disorder affects about 6 million American adults and is twice as common in women as men. Panic disorder is also highly disabling and often chronic and even mild forms of this disorder are linked to significantly increased impairment in function and quality of life as well as a number of comorbidities. Approximately 2.2 million adults in the U.S. are affected by obsessive-compulsive disorder and this disorder is often accompanied by psychiatric comorbidities. Roughly half of individuals with this condition have a chronic unremitting course which is associated with significant disability and morbidity. Social phobia, also known as social anxiety disorder, is seen in roughly 15 million adults in the U.S. and is often associated with MDD or other anxiety disorders. It is generally a chronic condition that leads to a great degree of disability due to substantial impairment in social, educational, and occupational function. Approximately 8 million adults in the U.S. experience PTSD and approximately 12% of the population have PTSD at some point in their lives and affected individuals frequently experience associated MDD, other anxiety disorders and substance use problems. The level of disability associated with this condition tends to be quite high and includes impairment in social and occupational function and quality of life. There are also substantial financial and social costs associated with PTSD due to increased hospitalization rates, suicidality, and substance use problem.

Mood disorders and anxiety disorders are highly prevalent conditions, many of which are chronic, nearly all of which are associated with substantial comorbidities, disability and impairment and some are associated with an increased risk for mortality. Despite the availability of many pharmacologic, psychotherapeutic, brain stimulation, and combination treatment options available to clinicians, many patients with Mood and Anxiety Spectrum Disorders respond poorly to treatment. In light of the impairments, costs, and risks of these disorders, the limitations of the available treatments represents an enormous burden to public health and speak strongly to the need for new treatments for these conditions as well as novel methodologies of treatment development that are not only faster than existing methodologies but which also promote new ways of thinking about these disorders and their treatment and capitalize on recent and ongoing developments in basic science.

This study will be a six-site randomized, double-blind, PBO (placebo) -controlled, parallel-group mono-therapy study to assess the effects of CERC-501 (formerly known as LY2456302) compared to PBO in adults age 21-65 years with mood and anxiety spectrum disorders. We will recruit a total of 90 subjects, of which 45 will be randomized to CERC-501 and 45 to placebo for 8 weeks of treatment

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
163

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Connecticut
      • New Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06510
        • Yale University
    • Indiana
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46202-l7176
        • Andrew Goddard, MD
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10029
        • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27710
        • Duke University Medical Center
    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44106
        • CaseWestern Reserve University
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 70030
        • Baylor College of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age between 21 and 65 years of age
  • Must meet DSM-IV TR (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition, text revision) diagnostic criteria for: Major Depressive Disorder, Bipolar I or II Depressed, Generalized Anxiety Disorder, Social Phobia, Panic Disorder, or Post Traumatic Stress Disorder
  • Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS) score ≥ 20
  • Reliable and willing to be available for the duration of the study
  • Willing and able to give written informed consent to participate
  • Able to understand and comply with instructions
  • If female of childbearing potential, must agree to use dual methods of contraception and be willing and able to continue contraception for 6 weeks after the last dose of study drug. Females using oral contraception must have started using it at least 2 months prior to the Baseline Visit
  • If male of childbearing potential, must have undergone surgical sterilization (such as a vasectomy) or agree to use a condom used with a spermicide during participation in the study and for 1 month afterward

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Expected to require hospitalization during the course of the study
  • Current/history of a psychotic disorder, current manic or mixed episode, autism spectrum disorders, mental retardation
  • Met DSMIV-TR (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition, text revision) criteria for substance abuse within the last 3 months or substance dependence within the last 6 months, excluding caffeine and/or nicotine
  • History of unstable or untreated serious medical condition based on physician evaluation, medical history, and screening laboratory testing
  • Active suicidal intent or plan, or history of attempt within the past 3 months based on physician evaluation and Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS)
  • Use of any antidepressant, antipsychotic, anxiolytic, anticonvulsant, mood stabilizing, muscle relaxant, centrally acting antihistaminergic, stimulant or insomnia medications (See Appendix 2) within 5 half-lives of baseline or at any time during after baseline
  • Use of any medication that is primarily metabolized by Cytochrome P450 2C8 within 14 days of baseline or at any time during the study. This includes: Cerivastatin, Paclitaxel, Repaglinide, Sorafenib, Rosiglitazone, Trimethoprim, Amodiaquine, Morphine, Amiodarone, Cabazitaxel, Carbamazepine, Chloroquine, Ibuprofen, Trepostinil, Torsemide.
  • Any contraindications to the magnetic resonance imaging procedures
  • Positive urine drug screen at any time during the study
  • Use of any investigational medication within 3 months prior to the start of this study or scheduled to receive an investigational drug other than the study drug during the course of this study
  • Known hypersensitivity to CERC-501 (formerly known as LY2456302)
  • History of severe allergies or multiple adverse drug reactions
  • History of gastric disease (including peptic ulcer disease, gastritis, upper GI bleeding, or any GI precancerous condition), current clinically evident gastrointestinal complaints, or positive urea breath test
  • Current use of a proton pump inhibitor or histamine 2 blocker, or a history of chronic NSAID (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug) use.
  • History of use of Salvia divinorum or use of Salvia divinorum at any time during the study.
  • Any other condition that in the opinion of the investigator would preclude participation in the study
  • Any smoking of cigarettes or use of other nicotine containing products within the last month or at any time during the study
  • Pregnant or lactating

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: CERC-501
Oral dosing of 10 mg CERC-501 (formerly known as LY2456302) administered daily for 8 weeks
Drug: CERC-501
Oral dosing of 10 mg CERC-501 daily for 8 weeks
Other Names:
  • Kappa Opioid Receptor Antagonist; LY2456302
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Oral daily administration of 10 mg placebo for 8 weeks
Drug: placebo
oral dosing of 10 mg placebo daily for 8 weeks

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Ventral Striatal Activation Occurring in Anticipation of Reward During the Monetary Incentive Delay Task Measured by fMRI
Time Frame: baseline, Week 8
Establish POC (Proof of Concept) for KOR (Kappa Opioid Receptor) antagonism by evaluating the impact of CERC-501 relative to Placebo on reward-related neural circuitry in terms of ventral striatal activation during anticipation of reward during the Monetary Incentive Delay Task. Evaluation by fMRI (Functional magnetic resonance imaging). The BOLD (Blood Oxygen Level-Dependent) score on the Z-scale represents how far the actual measured intensity is from the expected in the template. A score of 0 would correspond to the mean/median, a score of 1.65 would represent the 90-percentile, -1.65 the 10-percentile, and so on, according to a standard normal distribution.
baseline, Week 8

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical Anhedonia Measured by the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS; Total Score)
Time Frame: 8 weeks
To determine if CERC-501 is superior to placebo in improving a clinical self-report measure of anhedonia using the Snaith Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS). A single value was calculated for the average over 8 weeks. The SHAPS is a well-validated 14-item questionnaire used to assess anhedonia. It asks participants to agree or disagree with statements of hedonic response in pleasurable situations. Four responses are possible: Strongly disagree, Disagree, Agree, or Strongly agree. Each item is worded so that higher scores indicate greater pleasure capacity. A total score is derived by summing the responses to each item. Items answered "strongly agree" are coded as "1", while "strongly disagree" are coded a score of "4." Therefore, scores on the SHAPS can range from 14 to 56, with higher scores corresponding to higher levels of anhedonia.
8 weeks
Change in Behavioral Measure of Anhedonia Using the Probabilistic Reward Task
Time Frame: baseline, Week 8
To evaluate the impact of CERC-501 relative to placebo on a behavioral measure of anhedonia using the Probabilistic Reward Task (PRT). The PRT will be carried out at baseline and after 8 weeks of double-blind treatment to assess the effects on a behavioral outcome measure that assessed reward-related function (level of reward learning). The score obtained is a ratio of the number of times participants correctly choose the high reward stimuli versus the low rewarding stimuli
baseline, Week 8

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Duke University

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Baylor College of Medicine
Yale University
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Indiana University
Case Western Reserve University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Richard D Weiner, MD, PhD, Duke University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 15, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 15, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 18, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 8, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 14, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Pro00052485
  • HHSN271201200006I (Other Identifier: NIMH/NIH)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings