The Feasibility and Safety of No-scar Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer

December 16, 2016 updated by: Yanhong Deng, Sun Yat-sen University

A Pilot Study of the Feasibility and Safety of No-scar Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer Without Conventional Laparoscopic Assistance

During the past three years, a revolutionized radical surgical approach for rectal cancer ("down to up TME " approach or "transanal TME (TaTME)"approach, which is opposite to the conventional approach) has emerged and it is a concept that combines natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery(NOTES) and total mesorectal excision(TME) with curative intent. The feasibility, safety and reproducibility of it were first demonstrated in swine survival experiments and subsequently in human cadaver series, and then it was successfully applied to human patients in few centers around the world, most of which were performed with assistance of laparoscopy, namely hybrid transanal TME. In addition, pure-NOTES without conventional laparoscopic assistance (no scar) has also been demonstrated, though the cases were more limited. In the initial stage, our group has successfully performed this no-scar transanal TME in a series of human cadavers with satisfactory outcome. Hence the investigators conduct this study, looking to see if this pure transanal NOTES investigational procedure is a safe and effective approach to radically remove rectal cancer of the mid and lower rectum and meanwhile, if it can reduce pain, gain faster recovery and better function and life quality when gaining the best cosmetic effect.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) is a novel development in the field of colorectal surgery which combines the mini-invasive concept of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery(NOTES), the technique of single-port laparoscopic surgery and the principle of total mesorectal excision with curative intent for treating rectal cancer. Based on the platform of either transanal endoscopic microsurgery(TEM) or transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS), it is an innovative way of retrograde TME dissection from bottom to up with or without laparoscopic assistance. It is supposed to facilitate distal rectal mobilization, thus achieving precise and sufficient distal margin and to reduced need for multiple stapler firings in transecting the rectum, consequently decreasing anastomotic leakage rates which is especially important for obese male patients with a narrow pelvis where exposure to the distal rectum from the abdominal approach can prove difficult. It could also protect neurovascular bundle with better visualization and exposure and has the advantage of better function and avoiding sacrificing sphincter. After a series of preclinical trail of animal and cadaver, it has been successfully applied to humans and successional reports have proved its feasibility and safety. However, the majority of published series is hybrid NOTES, which need the assistance of conventional laparoscopic surgery from above to bottom and abdominal incision, scar, pain and incision related complications such as wound infection, abscess, hernia and implanted incisional tumors cannot be necessary avoided. It is also worried that the cost will increased since two groups of surgical equipment are needed(the abdominal and perineal) and more surgical staff are required if the two team operate at the same time(two-team approach). Up to date, as far as we have known, the pure transanal TME NOTES without any laparoscopic assistance has also been successfully performed in human patients though the cases are rare. The investigators of our center have also successfully performed pure-NOTES rectal resection in human cadavers in the past few months, and are confident to move this forward to conduct this pilot study to evaluate the feasibility and safety of this surgery in rectal cancer patients.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
20

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510655
        • Gastrointestinal Hospital, Sun Yatsen University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Biopsy-proven adenocarcinoma of the rectum
  • No previous abdominal surgery, no distant metastasis or synchronous colon cancer
  • BMI≤ 35kg/m2
  • Clinical staging (T1 or T2 or T3) with N1-2M0
  • Patients of rectal adenocarcinoma with T3N0 or N (+) received preoperative concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) as neoadjuvant therapy
  • Rectal cancer located 4-12 cm from the anal verge
  • The diameter of primary tumor should <6cm
  • Patients must have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1
  • American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) classⅠ to Ⅲ lesions
  • After the evaluation of Multi-disciplinary team (MDT)
  • Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • T4 tumor that invade the external sphincter or levator ani muscle or neighbor organs
  • Recurrent rectal cancer
  • Distant metastasis
  • Obstructing rectal cancer
  • Synchronous colon cancer
  • Pregnant or breast-feeding women
  • Fecal incontinence
  • History of prior colorectal cancer
  • History of inflammatory bowel disease
  • Other malignancies diagnosed within the previous year
  • Mental illness
  • Any evidence of active infection
  • History of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy
  • Impaired renal or hepatic function that could not tolerate surgery

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: no-scar transanal TME
no-scar transanal total mesorectal excision(TME) of rectal cancer
Procedure: no-scar transanal total mesorectal excision(TME)
Other Names:
  • Pure NOTES transanal TME
  • TaTME
  • TAMIS TME
  • single-port transanal TME

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Composite mesure of prioperative feasibility and safety
Time Frame: one-year
To evaluate the feasibility and safety by operative time, estimated blood loss, intraoperative complications, convert to Hybrid NOTES or open surgery, pathological outcome including Total Mesorectal Excision (TME) quality, the lymph nodes harvested, and specimen length, circumferential margin, etc. and postoperative complications graded according to Clavien-Dindo, reoperation rate, 30-day mortality, 30-day readmission
one-year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
composite measure of life quality
Time Frame: 1-3 year
To evaluate bladder function, anal function, sexual function and life quality by incontinence score, EORTC QLQ C30 and EORTC QLQ CR38, etc
1-3 year
Composite mesure of postoperative outcome
Time Frame: one-year
To evaluate the postoperative outcome by length of hospital stay after operation, the time of first flatus, the time of recover to flow diet, postoperative pain by VAS, analgesic use ,etc
one-year
Composite mesure of oncological outcome
Time Frame: 1-3 year
3-year disease free survival (DFS), 3-year local recurrence rate, 3-year distal metastasis rate, 3-year overall survival (cancer related or non-cancer related)
1-3 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Sun Yat-sen University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Jianping Wang, MD, Sun Yatsen University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 4, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 9, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 11, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 19, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 16, 2016

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • GIHSYSU08
  • D2014002 (Other Identifier: sysu 6th hospital)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings