Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Personalized Prophylaxis Human-cl rhFVIII in Patients With Severe Haemophilia A

December 21, 2020 updated by: Octapharma

Prospective, Open-label, Multi-centre Phase 3b Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Personalized Prophylaxis With Human-cl rhFVIII in Previously Treated Adult Patients With Severe Haemophilia A

The rationale of this study is to further fine-tune and individualize prophylactic treatment of patients with severe Haemophilia A with the goal of keeping the trough FVIII level above 1% between doses. Because trough FVIII levels are likely to be important predictors of the efficacy of prophylaxis, the focus of this study is on pharmacokinetic (PK) data.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
58

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Canada
    • Alberta
      • Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G1C9
        • Octapharma Research Site
    • Newfoundland and Labrador
      • St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada
        • Octapharma Research Site
    • Ontario
      • Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8N 4K1
        • McMaster University
  • Croatia
      • Zagreb, Croatia
        • University hospital centre Zagreb
  • Finland
      • Helsinki, Finland, 00290
        • Helsinki University Hospital
  • France
      • Bron, France, 69677
        • Centre Régional de Traitement de l'hémophilie
      • Clermont-Ferrand, France
        • Chu Estaing
      • La Réunion, France, 97400
        • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Félix Guyon
      • Nantes, France, 44093
        • Centre Régional de Traitement de l'hémophilie
      • Toulouse, France, 31059
        • Hôpital Purpan - Centre de Traitment Regional de l'Hemophilie Pole
  • Japan
      • Maebashi, Japan
        • Gunma University Hospital
      • Osaka, Japan
        • Osaka National Hospital
      • Tokyo, Japan
        • Ogikubo Hospital
      • Tokyo, Japan
        • Teikyo University Hospital
    • Aichi
      • Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
        • Nagoya University Hospital
    • Fukuoka
      • Kitakyushu, Fukuoka, Japan
        • Hospital of the Univ of Occupational and Environmental Health
    • Kanagawa
      • Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan
        • St. Marianna Univ School of Medicine Hospital
    • Nara
      • Kashihara, Nara, Japan
        • Nara Medical University Hospital
  • Netherlands
      • Groningen, Netherlands, 9713
        • University Medical Center Groningen
  • North Macedonia
      • Skopje, North Macedonia
        • PHI Institute of Transfusion Medicine of Republic of Macedonia
  • Slovenia
      • Ljubljana, Slovenia
        • University Medical Centre Ljubljana
  • United States
    • California
      • Sacramento, California, United States, 95817
        • Octapharma Research Site
    • Colorado
      • Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80045
        • Octapharma Research Site
    • District of Columbia
      • Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20057
        • Octapharma Research Site
    • Florida
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33136
        • Octapharma Research Site
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60612
        • Octapharma Research Site
    • Indiana
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46260
        • Octapharma Research Site
    • Tennessee
      • Memphis, Tennessee, United States, 38163
        • Octapharma Research Site
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • Octapharma Research Site
    • Utah
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84112
        • Octapharma Research Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Severe Haemophilia A (FVIII:C < 1%)
  • Male patients >= 18 years of age
  • Previous treatment with a FVIII concentrate for at least 150 EDs
  • Good documentation regarding dosing and bleeding frequency in the 6 months preceding study start
  • Immunocompetence (CD4+ count > 200/uL)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any coagulation disorder other than Haemophilia A
  • Present of past FVIII inhibitor activity
  • Severe liver or kidney disease

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Human-cl rhFVIII
Biological: Human cl rhFVIII

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Annualized Total Bleeding Rate of Individually Tailored Prophylaxis
Time Frame: 6 months
Total annualized bleeding rate (ABR) of individually tailored prophylaxis (GENA-21b) compared to historical bleeding rate in patients having received on-demand treatment (GENA-01) with Human-cl rhFVIII
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Annualized Spontaneous Bleeding Rate of Individually Tailored Prophylaxis
Time Frame: 6 months
Spontaneous annualized bleeding rate (ABR) of individually tailored prophylaxis (GENA-21b) compared to historical bleeding rate in patients having received on-demand treatment (GENA-01) with Human-cl rhFVIII
6 months
Annualized Total Bleeding Rate in Patients With 2x/Week (or Less) Prophylaxis
Time Frame: 6 months
Total annualized bleeding rate (ABR) in patients with 2x/week (or less) prophylaxis (GENA-21b) compared to historical bleeding rate in patients having received on-demand treatment (GENA-01) with Human-cl rhFVIII
6 months
Median Prophylactic Dosing Interval
Time Frame: 6 months
Median over median actual dosing intervals between two prophylactic treatments per patient. The median time (hours) between two prophylactic doses of Human-cl rhFVIII in the prophylactic treatment Phase II per patient
6 months
Mean Prophylactic Dosing Interval
Time Frame: 6 months
Mean over mean actual dosing intervals between two prophylactic treatments per patient. The mean time (hours) between two prophylactic doses of Human-cl rhFVIII in the prophylactic treatment Phase II per patient
6 months
AUC Divided by the Dose (AUCnorm) of Human-cl rhFVIII
Time Frame: Before injection (within 1 h before injection) and up to 72 h (± 2 h) after the end of injection
AUCnorm of Human-cl rhFVIII measured using the one-stage (OS) assay
Before injection (within 1 h before injection) and up to 72 h (± 2 h) after the end of injection
In-vivo Recovery (IVR) of Human-cl rhFVIII
Time Frame: Before injection (within 1 h before injection) and up to 72 h (± 2 h) after the end of injection
IVR of Human-cl rhFVIII measured using the one-stage (OS) assay and will be determined from the FVIII level before the infusion and the peak level after the infusion of Human-cl rhFVIII
Before injection (within 1 h before injection) and up to 72 h (± 2 h) after the end of injection
Half Life (t1/2) of Human-cl rhFVIII
Time Frame: Before injection (within 1 h before injection) and up to 72 h (± 2 h) after the end of injection
T1/2 of Human-cl rhFVIII measured using the one-stage (OS) assay
Before injection (within 1 h before injection) and up to 72 h (± 2 h) after the end of injection
Mean Residence Time (MRT) of Human-cl rhFVIII
Time Frame: Before injection (within 1 h before injection) and up to 72 h (± 2 h) after the end of injection
MRT of Human-cl rhFVIII measured using the one-stage (OS) assay
Before injection (within 1 h before injection) and up to 72 h (± 2 h) after the end of injection
Clearance (CL) of Human-cl rhFVIII
Time Frame: Before injection (within 1 h before injection) and up to 72 h (± 2 h) after the end of injection
CL of Human-cl rhFVIII measured using the one-stage (OS) assay
Before injection (within 1 h before injection) and up to 72 h (± 2 h) after the end of injection
Volume of Distribution at Steady State (Vss) of Human-cl rhFVIII
Time Frame: Before injection (within 1 h before injection) and up to 72 h (± 2 h) after the end of injection
Vss of Human-cl rhFVIII measured using the one-stage (OS) assay
Before injection (within 1 h before injection) and up to 72 h (± 2 h) after the end of injection
Usage of Human-cl rhFVIII (FVIII IU/kg BW Per Week Per Patient)
Time Frame: 6 months
Average weekly consumption of Human-cl rhFVIII reported as IU/kg BW per week per patient was determined during individualized prophylactic treatment
6 months
Number of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs)
Time Frame: At each study visit over the study duration (7-9 months)
AEs were documented at each (scheduled or unscheduled) study visit. Severity and seriousness of all AEs were documented by the investigator according to pre-defined criteria
At each study visit over the study duration (7-9 months)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Octapharma

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Craig M Kessler, MD, Georgetown University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 30, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 1, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 6, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 19, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 21, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • GENA-21B

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings