Musculoskeletal Ultrasound Assessment of Therapeutic Response of Tofacitinib in Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients

February 27, 2019 updated by: Dr. Veena Ranganath, University of California, Los Angeles
This proposal will evaluate if musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS) measures or multi-biomarker disease activity (MBDA) improve in patients treated with tofacitinib over 3 months, and whether early MSUS measures/MBDA can predict response to therapy.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This is a pilot open-label trial of 25 RA patients treated with tofacitinib over 3 months. The patients meeting inclusion criteria will be started on tofacitinib 5mg po bid. Patients will be recruited from the UCLA Rheumatology Clinics. Inclusion criteria will include the following: meeting ACR 1987 RA criteria, DAS28≥3.2, age≥18, and PDUS>10 (see below for more details). Patients who are deemed unsafe to enroll will be excluded. Ultrasound measures (PDUS/GSUS) and MBDA scores will be obtained at screen, baseline, 2 weeks, and 3 months. In addition, we will also obtain HAQ-DI, CDAI, and DAS28 at the same time points. In addition, we will have a 6 week visit for capturing adverse events, concomitant drugs, drug dispensation, and evaluation of adherence. Currently, there are several US measures to evaluate therapeutic response in RA patients that have been used in the literature. Some US studies evaluate all joints involved in RA, which is time consuming. At present, there is no consensus as to the ideal ultrasound scoring system. However, we will utilize a 34-joint US scoring system to evaluate response to therapy in this proposal (see Table 1). Our research team has expertise in MSUS (given several workshops/lectures nationally) and we have proficiency in designing/conducting MSUS clinical trials. We currently have 4 ultrasonography-rheumatologists at UCLA who are ACR certified in MSUS.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
37

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90095
        • UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient must meet 1987 ACR criteria
  2. Age > 18 years of age
  3. Baseline DAS28/ESR>=3.2
  4. Stable concomitant DMARDs
  5. Stable prednisone <10mg or equivalent
  6. Power Doppler score of >=10
  7. Female subjects of childbearing potential must test negative for pregnancy
  8. Male and female subjects of childbearing potential must agree to use contraception throughout the study
  9. Negative QuantiFERON Gold test at screening

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. No active TB
  2. Prednisone >10 mg
  3. Pregnancy or breast feeding
  4. Prior treatment with tofacitinib
  5. Concomitant biologic therapy (TNF inhibitors, IL-6 inhibitors, etc.)
  6. Active infection with HIV, hepatitis B or C, or herpes zoster

  7. Subjects with any uncontrolled clinically significant laboratory abnormality or any of the following laboratory abnormalities:

    1. Evidence of hematopoietic disorder or hemoglobin <9 g/dL
    2. Absolute lymphocyte count <0.75 x 109/L (<750/mm3)
    3. Absolute neutrophil count <1.2 x 109/L (<1200/mm3)
    4. Platelet count <100 x 109/L (<100,000/mm3)
    5. Alanine aminotransferase (ALT), or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) >1.5 times the upper limit of normal (x ULN)
    6. Estimated GFR <40 ml/min
  8. Subjects who have received live or live attenuated vaccines within 6 weeks prior to the first dose of study drug (or the zoster vaccine)
  9. Subjects who require concomitant treatment with medications that are potent inhibitors of cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4), both moderate inhibitors of CYP3A4 and potent inhibitors of CYP2C19, and potent CYP inducers (See Appendix)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Other: tofacitinib 5mg po bid
Open label with tofacitinib 5mg po bid
Drug: tofacitinib 5mg po bid

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PDUS
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 2, Month 3
30 joints will be evaluated using a 0 to 3 point scale for each joint and the sum of these represents PDUS. The Power Doppler Synovitis Score (PDUS) ranges from 0 to 90. Scores of 0 indicate the least amount of inflammation of the joint while scores of 3 indicate the most amount of inflammation. A higher value of the total score for PDUS represents more severe disease level.
Baseline, Week 2, Month 3
GSUS
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 2, Month 3
30 joints will be evaluated using a 0 to 3 point scale for each joint and the sum of these represents GSUS. The grey scale synovial hypertrophy score (GSUS) ranges from 0 to 90. Scores of 0 indicate the least amount of inflammation of the joint while scores of 3 indicate the most amount of inflammation. A higher value of the total score for GSUS represents more severe disease level.
Baseline, Week 2, Month 3
CDAI
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 2, Month 3
CDAI was derived as the sum of the following: tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), participant global assessment (PGA) of disease activity, and physician assessment of disease activity. TJC and SJC were taken as the number of tender and swollen joints, respectively, out of 28 assessed joints. PGA and physician assessment of disease activity were scored 0-100 millimeters (mm) and rounded to the nearest centimeter (cm) on a visual analog scale (VAS), where higher scores indicate greater perceived disease activity. The total CDAI score range was 0-76, where higher scores indicate increased disease activity.
Baseline, Week 2, Month 3
DAS28/ESR
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 2, Month 3
TJC and SJC were taken as the number of tender and swollen joints, respectively, out of 28 assessed joints. Patient Global Assessment of disease activity was scored 0-100 millimeters (mm) and rounded to the nearest centimeter (cm) on a visual analog scale (VAS), where higher scores indicate greater perceived disease activity. ESR lab value were included in the total calculation. The scale being used is called the Disease Activity Score for 28 Joints (DAS28) using the Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) in the calculation.The scale ranges from 0 to 9.4, where higher values represent a higher disease activity.The complete formula to calculate DAS28/ESR is 0.56*sqrt(TJC) + (0.28*sqrt(SJC)) + (0.7*ln(ESR)) + (0.014*Patient Global*10).
Baseline, Week 2, Month 3

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
MBDA
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 2, Month 3
The multi-biomarker disease activity (MBDA) blood test assesses RA disease activity. An algorithm of 12 markers is used to characterize RA disease activity on a scale of 1-100, where a score of 100 represents the highest level of disease activity present.
Baseline, Week 2, Month 3

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of California, Los Angeles

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Veena Ranganath, MD, MS, UCLA David Geffen School of Medicine, Division of Rheumatology

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
February 16, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 29, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 29, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 23, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 16, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 22, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 19, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 27, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • WI193025

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings