To Compare the Efficacy Between 3 Fetal Monitoring Methods (EUM)
A Prospective, Blinded Clinical Study to Compare the Efficacy Between Three Fetal Monitoring Methods: Electro Uterine Monitor (EUM), Fetal Doppler and Scalp Electrode.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Once in labor, the parturient will be connected to the routine fetal doppler and EUM. When necessary according to clinical indications, the scalp electrode will be connected. Tracing will be recorded simultaneously from all three devices until delivery.
study design:
- signing an informed consent at vas<3
- admittance to delivery room.
- Verifying inclusion and exclusion criteria, describing clinical rial goal, motivation and phases.
- Connecting the patient to three devices (fetal Doppler, scalp electrode and EUM) simultaneously.
- Recording fetal heart rate until delivery.
- Disconnecting the patient from all devices if required according to clinical need.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
Study Contact
- Name: Yariv Yogev, professor
- Phone Number: 972-3-9377494
- Email: yarivy@clalit.org.il
Study Locations
-
-
-
Petah tikva, Israel
- Recruiting
- Rabin Medical Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Clinical indication to insert a scalp electrode for fetal heart rate tracing.
- Maternal age>18 years.
- Reactive fetal heart rate monitoring and BPP (Biophysical Profile) 8/8 at enrollment.
- Singleton pregnancy.
- No fetal abnormality or chromosomal defect.
- Subjects are willing and able to comply with the requirements of the protocol.
- Fully understand all elements of, and have singed and dated the written informed consent form before initiation of protocol specified procedures, when vas<3.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Women who refuse to sign the informed consent form.
- Maternal age<18 years.
- Multiple pregnancy.
- Women with implanted electronic device of any kind.
- Women with allergic to silver.
- Irritated skin or open wound.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: DIAGNOSTIC
- Allocation: NA
- Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
- Masking: DOUBLE
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Scalp electrode, fetal doppler and EUM
Once in labor, the parturient will be connected to the routine fetal doppler and EUM.
When necessary according to clinical indications, the scalp electrode will be connected.
Tracing will be recorded simultaneously from all three devices until delivery.
|
the parturient will be connected to the routine fetal Doppler and to the EUM. and When necessary to the scalp electrode will be connected.
Tracings will be recorded simultaneously from all three devices until delivery.
three separate outputs will be processed Output of the scalp electrode recording.
Output of the fetal doppler.
Output of the EUM.
Three noncontinuous segments of 30 minutes each with two segments occurring during the first stage of labor and the third occurring during the second stage of labor, will be randomly picked from the scalp electrode recording with 3 matching segments in time from the EUM100pro and the fetal doppler.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The difference between the fetal scalp electrode tracings and the EUM tracings of the fetal heart activity.
Time Frame: 12 month
|
Mean Positive Percent Agreement (PPA) for interpretable/un interpretable traces (between EUM, scalp electrode and fetal doppler).
|
12 month
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Reliability
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Mean sensitivity for individual tracing identification (between EUM, scalp electrode and fetal doppler)
|
12 months
|
|
Reliability
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Mean Positive Predictive Value (PPV) for individual tracing identification (between EUM, scalp electrode and fetal doppler)
|
12 months
|
|
Reliability
Time Frame: 12 months
|
The mean False Positive Rate (FPR) for individual tracing identification (between EUM, scalp electrode and fetal Doppler)
|
12 months
|
|
Accuracy
Time Frame: 12 months
|
The difference in fetal heart rate baseline and variability (between EUM, scalp electrode and fetal doppler)
|
12 months
|
|
Accuracy
Time Frame: 12 months
|
The difference in periodic changes (between EUM, scalp electrode and fetal Doppler).
|
12 months
|
|
Adverse events
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Number and percentage of adverse events during the study period
|
12 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Yariv Yogev, professor, Director, division of obstetrics and delivery ward Rabin medical center
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ESTIMATE)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 0131-14-RMC
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.