A Phase 1 Study of Osilodrostat (LCI699) in Healthy Volunteers and Subjects With Impaired Hepatic Function

December 16, 2020 updated by: Novartis Pharmaceuticals

A Phase I, Open-label, Multi-center, Single Dose, Parallel Group Study to Evaluate the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of Osilodrostat (LCI699) in Subjects With Impaired Hepatic Function Compared to Subjects With Normal Hepatic Function

To assess the pharmacokinetics of a single oral dose of osilodrostat (LCI699) 30 mg in subjects with mild, moderate and severe hepatic impairment compared with subjects with normal hepatic function.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
33

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Florida
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33136
        • University of Miami / Clinical Research Services, Inc. Boynton Beach
      • Orlando, Florida, United States, 32809
        • Orlando Clinical Research Center
    • Minnesota
      • Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55404
        • DaVita Clinical Research

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Weight ≥50 kg and BMI between 18-38kg/m2.
  • Stable liver cirrhosis and evidence of hepatic impairment.
  • Free of significant medical disorders unrelated to underlying hepatic impairment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of any surgical or medical condition which might significantly alter the absorption, distribution, metabolism or excretion of drugs
  • Subjects with ongoing alcohol or drug abuse
  • Symptoms or history of encephalopathy (Grade 2 or above)
  • History or presence of liver disease or liver injury (healthy volunteers only)
  • History or presence of impaired renal function
  • Clinical evidence of severe ascites.
  • Total Bilirubin > 6 mg/dL,
  • Subjects with a serum free cortisol test results that is below the lower limit of normal (based on central laboratory) during the screening period
  • Concomitant use of a drug that is a strong inducer of the CYP3A4/5 pathway

Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply -

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: osilodrostat (LCI699)
Each participant will undergo a 28-day screening/baseline period (day -28 to day -1), followed by a 5 day treatment period (a single 30 mg dose of LCI699 ( Day 1) with 5 days of PK sample collection).
Drug: osilodrostat
Other Names:
  • LCI699

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pharmacokinetics (PK) of a single dose of 30 mg osilodrostat: AUClast
Time Frame: Predose (Day 0) , and at timepoints 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3,4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96 hours post dose.
To assess the influence of hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of LCI699i in subjects with varying degrees of hepatic impairment compared to subjects with normal hepatic function.
Predose (Day 0) , and at timepoints 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3,4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96 hours post dose.
PK of a single dose of 30 mg osilodrostat: AUCinf
Time Frame: Predose (Day 0) , and at imepoints 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3,4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96 hours post dose.
To assess the influence of hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of LCI699i in subjects with varying degrees of hepatic impairment compared to subjects with normal hepatic function.
Predose (Day 0) , and at imepoints 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3,4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96 hours post dose.
PK of a single dose of 30 mg osilodrostat: Cmax
Time Frame: Predose (Day 0) , and at timepoints 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3,4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96 hours post dose.
To assess the influence of hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of LCI699i in subjects with varying degrees of hepatic impairment compared to subjects with normal hepatic function.
Predose (Day 0) , and at timepoints 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3,4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96 hours post dose.
PK of a single dose of 30 mg osilodrostat: T1/2
Time Frame: Predose (Day 0) , and at timepoints 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3,4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96 hours post dose.
To assess the influence of hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of LCI699i in subjects with varying degrees of hepatic impairment compared to subjects with normal hepatic function.
Predose (Day 0) , and at timepoints 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3,4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96 hours post dose.
PK of a single dose of 30 mg osilodrostat: CL/F
Time Frame: Predose (Day 0) , and at timepoints 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3,4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96 hours post dose.
To assess the influence of hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of LCI699i in subjects with varying degrees of hepatic impairment compared to subjects with normal hepatic function.
Predose (Day 0) , and at timepoints 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3,4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96 hours post dose.
PK of a single dose of 30 mg osilodrostat: Vz/F
Time Frame: Predose (Day 0) , and timepoints 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3,4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96 hours post dose.
To assess the influence of hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of LCI699i in subjects with varying degrees of hepatic impairment compared to subjects with normal hepatic function.
Predose (Day 0) , and timepoints 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3,4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96 hours post dose.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The relationship between PK parameters (Cmax and AUC) and baseline hepatic function parameters namely; total bilirubin, albumin, INR (or prothrombin, if INR unavailable)
Time Frame: Predose ( Day 0) and at timepoints 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3,4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96 hours post dose.
To evaluate the relationship between hepatic function parameters and pharmacokinetics.
Predose ( Day 0) and at timepoints 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3,4, 6, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, 96 hours post dose.
Number of participants with adverse events (AEs)
Time Frame: Pre-treatment, during treatment (Day 1) and 30 days post treatment.
This will be assessed using laboratory abnormalities, ECG and vital sign assessments of a single 30 mg dose of LCI699
Pre-treatment, during treatment (Day 1) and 30 days post treatment.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 21, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 19, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 19, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
February 23, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 23, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 26, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 19, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 16, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CLCI699C2103

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings