A Comparison of Laparoscopic With Open Distal Gastrectomy in Advanced Gastric Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy (REALIZATION)

September 26, 2018 updated by: Ziyu Li, MD, Peking University

A Randomized, Single Center, Controlled Phase II Study to Compare Laparoscopic Versus Open Distal Gastrectomy in Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic distal D2 gastrectomy (LDG) compared with open surgery (ODG) for resectable gastric cancer, to determine whether LDG can be a test arm for a future Phase III trial to evaluate the non-inferiority of overall survival compared with ODG in patients who receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The study is an open-label, controlled, randomized Phase II clinical trial. The protocol has been approved by the Ethics Committee of Beijing Cancer Hospital.

The primary endpoint is the 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate. The secondary endpoints are the overall survival, surgical morbidity and mortality.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
102

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Beijing
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100142
        • Peking University Cancer Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Histologically proven adenocarcinoma of the stomach.
  • Clinical cT2N+M0,or cT3-4a/N+M0 disease, confirmed by upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and abdominal computed tomography (CT) and laparoscopy. The T and N stages are determined by the method of Habermann et al.
  • The gastric tumors are located in the middle to lower third of the stomach, are macroscopically resectable by distal gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection, and R0 or R1 resection can be achieved.
  • No bulky lymph node metastasis is detected by abdominal CT.
  • No pleural effusion, no ascites exceeding the pelvis and no metastasis to the peritoneum, liver or other distant organs are confirmed by abdominal pelvic CT.
  • No clinically apparent distant metastasis.
  • Karnofsky performance status ≥70%.
  • Sufficient oral intake.
  • No previous treatment with chemotherapy or radiation therapy for any tumors.
  • No previous surgery for the present disease.
  • Sufficient organ function, as evaluated by laboratory tests 7 days or more after the date when the anticancer drugs were given. When patients are recovering from myelosuppression,the revised criteria are shown in parentheses.

White blood cell count≥3000/mm3 (2000/mm3) Platelet count≥10.0*104/mm3 (5.0*104/mm3) Aspartate aminotransferase≤100 IU/l Alanine aminotransferase≤100 IU/l Total bilirubin≤2.0 mg/dl Serum creatinine≤1.5 mg/dl

  • No need for emergency surgery due to bleeding or perforation of the primary tumor.
  • No mechanical obstruction.
  • Written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Past history of upper abdominal surgery.
  • Past history of surgery for the gastrointestinal tract.
  • Body mass index exceeding 30 kg/m2.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
EXPERIMENTAL: Laparoscopic gastrectomy
Laparoscopic distal gastrectomy and D2 lymph node dissection are performed for locally advanced gastric cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Drug: Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
XELOX: Oxaliplatin 130mg/m2,iv.,d1;Capecitabine 1000mg/m2,po.,Bid,d1-14; Repeat every 21 days for 3 courses.
Other Names:
  • NACT
Procedure: Laparoscopic gastrectomy
Laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection
Other Names:
  • LDG
Drug: Adjuvant Chemotherapy
XELOX: Oxaliplatin 130mg/m2,iv.,d1;Capecitabine 1000mg/m2,po.,Bid,d1-14; Repeat every 21 days for 5 courses.
Other Names:
  • ACT
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Open gastrectomy
Open distal gastrectomy and D2 lymph node dissection are performed for locally advanced gastric cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Drug: Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
XELOX: Oxaliplatin 130mg/m2,iv.,d1;Capecitabine 1000mg/m2,po.,Bid,d1-14; Repeat every 21 days for 3 courses.
Other Names:
  • NACT
Drug: Adjuvant Chemotherapy
XELOX: Oxaliplatin 130mg/m2,iv.,d1;Capecitabine 1000mg/m2,po.,Bid,d1-14; Repeat every 21 days for 5 courses.
Other Names:
  • ACT
Procedure: Open gastrectomy
Open distal gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection
Other Names:
  • ODG

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
3-year progression-free survival
Time Frame: 36 months
In terms of locally advanced gastric cancer, to evaluate the disease free survival rate in laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection at postoperative 3 years compared with open subtotal gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection
36 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall survival
Time Frame: 36 months
In terms of locally advanced gastric cancer, to evaluate the overall survival rate in laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection at postoperative 3 years compared with open subtotal gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection
36 months
Surgical morbidity
Time Frame: 30 days
Surgical morbidity is defined as the events which occurs with-in postoperative 30 days, extension of hospitalization and re-hospitalization. It is necessary to evaluate the complication and if it occurs during the hospitalization, it is required to record complication name, date of on-set (postoperatively), grade on Clavien-Dindo Classification and treatment for complication.
30 days
Surgical mortality
Time Frame: 30 days
It is defined as the death within postoperative 30 days regardless of postoperative reason. If the patient is transferred to other medication institutes with impossible condition for recovery before death, it is regarded as death.
30 days
Postoperative recovery index
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Postoperatively, the investigator evaluates the patient's recovery condition once a day. Evaluation items for patient's recovery condition: the pain score, the leaving bed time, postoperative gastrointestinal function recovery time and hospital stay.
2 weeks
Postoperative quality of life
Time Frame: Up to 1 year post-operative
In pre-therapy <7 days, pre-operative <7 days, and post-operative at 12 months after surgery, both the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) C30 and STO22 are analyzed with quality of life by following methods. In case of EORTC-C30, the analysis is undergone by classifying into 5 functional scales (physical, role, emotional, cognitive, and social functioning), 3 symptom scales (fatigue, pain and nausea, and vomiting), 1 global health status and 6 single items.
Up to 1 year post-operative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Peking University

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Beijing Municipal Science & Technology Commission

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Ziyu Li, M.D., Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 1, 2015

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 25, 2020

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 25, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 23, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 30, 2015

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 31, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 28, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 26, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • GISCA2015001/LAP

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Gastric Cancer

Clinical Trials on Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings