Efficacy of the Dental Vibe Unit for Use of Reduction or Elimination of Pain During Dental Anesthetic Injection

April 10, 2015 updated by: University of the Pacific
The purpose of the research was to test the efficacy of the Dental Vibe Injection Comfort System. The study was conducted by faculty to have students as subjects to see if there are any differences in the comfort level of an ASA injection given on one side with topical anesthesia and lidocaine 1:100,000 with epinephrine using a standard syringe, and the other side uing the Dental Vibe, topical anesthesia and lidocaine 1:100,000 with epinephrine and a standard syringe. The Dental Vibe emits strong pulsed vibration which is transmitted via a silicone mouth piece to mucosal tissue. This in turn interferes with, blocks or reduces the perception of pain from the injection for the patient. It is stated that this phenomenon is achieved due to the "gate theory" of neuronal activity. There are also likely, distraction and placebo effects that contribute to the devices' efficacy.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Subjects were in groups of 3-4 for 2 ½ hours where 1 subject will be the operator delivering injection, 1 subject will be the assistant, and 1 subject was the patient receiving the injection. It was all be conducted in the pre-clinical local anesthesia rotation in a clinical setting. OSHA regulations will be followed and supplies was provided for subjects.

Using standard syringe, the operator assembled a 27 gauge short needle and load a 2% lidocaine 1:100,000 epi cartridge. Gauze was applied to the area of the upper right muccobuccal fold, where the penetration site of the ASA injection was administered. Small amount of topical will be placed at penetration site and left for approximately one minute. The subject posing as the operator obtained a retraction method using a mouth mirror. The ASA injection technique was then be applied and 1/3 cartridge of solution will be administered at the deposition site.

Immediately after, using same standard syringe and remaining anesthestic cartridge, the operator replaced the 27 gauge short needle. Gauze was applied to the area of the upper left muccobuccal fold, where the penetration site of the ASA injection was administered. Small amount of topical was placed at penetration site and left for approximately one minute. The subject posing as the operator will obtain a retraction method using the Dental Vibe Unit, turn the device on and kept active for 3-5 seconds prior to, during, and after needle penetration. The ASA injection technique was applied and 1/3 cartridge of solution was administered at the deposition site.

The ASA injection technique had a penetration site into the muccobuccal fold above or in between the maxillary canine and maxillary first pre-molar. The depth of penetration was initially 3 mm into soft tissue, and then the needle was slowly advanced an additional 2 mm or until bone was gently reached. Anesthesia was then deposited at a rate of ¼ cartridge / 15 seconds. An aspiration test was given, which then confirmed that anesthesia was not being deposited into a blood vessel. Once 1/3 cartridge was dispensed, needle was then removed from site.

An evaluation then was given to the subject posing as the patient. The subjects was carefully observed for appropriate site preparation, injection technique, proper placement of mouth mirror, and proper placement of Dental Vibe Unit.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
80

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The subjects will be first and second year students giving their injections during their anesthesia rotation. Subjects are not being actively recruited.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Students will be given the option to voluntarily participate in this study during their normally scheduled anesthesia rotation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Dental Vibe
New oscillating device for reduction in pain during dental anesthesia
Device: Generation II Dental Vibe Unit
. The Dental Vibe emits strong pulsed vibration which is transmitted via a silicone mouth piece to mucosal tissue.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
reduction of pain in dental anesthesia
Time Frame: 15 min
15 min

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of the Pacific

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 8, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 10, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 13, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 13, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 10, 2015

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 10-40.7

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dental Pain

Clinical Trials on Generation II Dental Vibe Unit

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings