Play and Pre-Literacy Among Young Children (PLAY)
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Ontario
-
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8H 4L8
- Boys and Girls Club of Hamilton
-
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, L8P 0A1
- McMaster Innovation Park
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- typical development
Exclusion Criteria:
- diagnosed with any developmental delay (e.g., autism, Developmental Coordination Disorder, etc.) or health conditions that may prohibit safe participation in the program (e.g., unstable heart condition).
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Motor and pre-literacy program
First group to receive the motor and pre-literacy program.
|
The program will run for 60 minutes once per week for 10 consecutive weeks and will consist of three components: direct FMS instruction, unstructured exploratory free-play, and an interactive storybook reading activity.
The curriculum and teaching strategies to be used for the first two segments of our intervention have been successfully implemented in previous research to improve the motor skills of 4 year old children with autism (Bremer, Balogh, & Lloyd, 2014).
Specific strategies and books were selected from an existing evidence-based curriculum (Justice & McGuinty, 2009).
There will be active involvement of at least one parent in the direct instruction and reading components.
|
|
Active Comparator: Wait-list comparison
Second group to receive the motor and pre-literacy program after the experimental arm has completed the program.
|
The participants will not participate in the motor and pre-literacy program for 10 weeks after enrollment and will continue with their normal daily life without any intervention.
After the experimental arm completes the motor and pre-literacy program, the wait-list group will receive the exact same motor and pre-literacy intervention.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Change from baseline in Peabody Developmental Motor Scales-2 at 11-12 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline and 11-12 weeks
|
Baseline and 11-12 weeks
|
|
Change from baseline in pre-literacy skills (Phonological Awareness Literacy Screening: Preschool and Preschool Word and Print Awareness Test) at 11-12 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline and 11-12 weeks
|
Baseline and 11-12 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change from baseline in parental engagement in motor and pre-literacy activities at 15-16 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline and 15-16 weeks.
|
Baseline and 15-16 weeks.
|
|
|
Change from baseline in Peabody Developmental Motor Scales-2 at 15-16 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline and 15-16 weeks.
|
Baseline and 15-16 weeks.
|
|
|
Change from baseline in Pictorial Scale of Perceived Competence and Social Acceptance for Young Children (Preschool-Kindergarten version) scale at 15-16 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline and 15-16 weeks.
|
Baseline and 15-16 weeks.
|
|
|
Change from baseline in Pictorial Scale of Perceived Competence and Social Acceptance for Young Children (Preschool-Kindergarten version) scale at 11-12 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline and 11-12 weeks.
|
Baseline and 11-12 weeks.
|
|
|
Change from baseline in pre-literacy skills (Phonological Awareness Literacy Screening: Preschool and Preschool Word and Print Awareness Test) at 15-16 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline and 15-16 weeks.
|
Baseline and 15-16 weeks.
|
|
|
Change from baseline in Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function®-Preschool Version (BRIEF®-P) scale at 15-16 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline and 15-16 weeks.
|
Parent-reported measure of executive function
|
Baseline and 15-16 weeks.
|
|
Change from baseline in Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function®-Preschool Version (BRIEF®-P) scale at 11-12 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline and 11-12 weeks.
|
Parent-reported measure of executive function
|
Baseline and 11-12 weeks.
|
|
Change from baseline in Social Skills Improvement System (parent version) scale at 15-16 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline and 15-16 weeks.
|
Parent-reported measure of social skills and behavioral problems
|
Baseline and 15-16 weeks.
|
|
Change from baseline in Social Skills Improvement System (parent version) scale at 11-12 weeks
Time Frame: Baseline and 11-12 weeks.
|
Parent-reported measure of social skills and behavioral problems
|
Baseline and 11-12 weeks.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Harter S, Pike R. The pictorial scale of perceived competence and social acceptance for young children. Child Dev. 1984 Dec;55(6):1969-82.
- National Research Council (US) and Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Integrating the Science of Early Childhood Development; Shonkoff JP, Phillips DA, editors. From Neurons to Neighborhoods: The Science of Early Childhood Development. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2000. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK225557/
- Boethel M. Readiness: School, Family, & Community Connections. Annual Synthesis, 2004. Southwest Educational Development Laboratory [Internet]. 2004 [cited 2015 Feb2]. Available from: http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED484507.pdf
- Bremer E, Balogh R, Lloyd M. Effectiveness of a fundamental motor skill intervention for 4-year-old children with autism spectrum disorder: A pilot study. Autism. 2015 Nov;19(8):980-91. doi: 10.1177/1362361314557548. Epub 2014 Nov 28.
- Clark JE From the beginning: a developmental perspective on movement and mobility. Quest [Internet]. 2005 [cited 2014 Dec 1]; 57(1):37-45. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00336297.2005.10491841 DOI: 10.1080/00336297.2005.10491841
- Diamond A. Close interrelation of motor development and cognitive development and of the cerebellum and prefrontal cortex. Child Dev. 2000 Jan-Feb;71(1):44-56. doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00117.
- Folio MR, Fewell RR. Peabody Developmental Motor Scales--2nd Edition. 1974
- Gioia G, Espy KA, Isquith PK. Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Preschool Version (BRIEF-P). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources; 2005.
- Gresham FM, Elliott SN. Social Skills Improvement System-Rating Scales. Minneapolis, MN: Pearson Assessments; 2008.
- Invernizzi MA, Sullivan A, Meier JD, Swank L. Phonological Awareness Literacy Screening: Preschool Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia; 2004.
- Isenberg JP, Quisenberry N. A position paper of the Association for Childhood Education International PLAY: Essential for all Children. Childhood Education [Internet] 2002 [cited 2015 Feb 22];79(1):33-39. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00094056.2002.10522763
- Iverson JM. Developing language in a developing body: the relationship between motor development and language development. J Child Lang. 2010 Mar;37(2):229-61. doi: 10.1017/S0305000909990432. Epub 2010 Jan 25.
- Justice LM, Ezell HK. Word and print awareness in 4-year old children. Child Language Teaching and Therapy [Internet] 2001 October [cited 2015 Apr 2];17(3): 207-225. Available from: http://clt.sagepub.com/content/17/3/207.full.pdf+html
- Justice LM, McGuinty AS. Read It Again-PreK!A Preschool Curriculum Supplement to Promote Language and Literacy Foundations. [Internet] 2009 [cited 2014 Oct 20]. Available from: http://arts-sciences.und.edu/communication-sciences-disorders/_files/docs/readitagain-prekmanual.pdf
- Logan SW, Robinson LE, Wilson AE, Lucas WA. Getting the fundamentals of movement: a meta-analysis of the effectiveness of motor skill interventions in children. Child Care Health Dev. 2012 May;38(3):305-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2011.01307.x. Epub 2011 Sep 1.
- Bedard C, Bremer E, Campbell W, Cairney J. Evaluation of a Direct-Instruction Intervention to Improve Movement and Preliteracy Skills among Young Children: A Within-Subject Repeated-Measures Design. Front Pediatr. 2018 Jan 17;5:298. doi: 10.3389/fped.2017.00298. eCollection 2017.
- Bedard C, Bremer E, Campbell W, Cairney J. A Quasi-Experimental Study of a Movement and Preliteracy Program for 3- and 4-Year-Old Children. Front Pediatr. 2017 May 1;5:94. doi: 10.3389/fped.2017.00094. eCollection 2017.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- INCH-0415
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.