Physician Coaching to Reduce Opioid-related Harms

July 3, 2018 updated by: University of Wisconsin, Madison
This project pilot tests an innovative clinical guideline translation and physician coaching model to promote adherence to evidence-based guidelines for the prescribing of opioid pain medications in primary care settings.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This project addresses the urgent need to promote the adoption of evidence-based practices in healthcare by pilot-testing an innovative implementation strategy. The implementation strategy aims primarily to reduce variation in opioid prescribing practices for chronic pain in primary care settings.

The standard approach to improving medical practice involves groups of clinical experts reviewing the literature to produce clinical guidelines based on scientific evidence, and disseminating those guidelines by publishing them in medical journals. A clinical guideline has been developed for opioid prescribing for chronic non-cancer pain using this type of approach. The implementation strategy for promoting uptake of the guideline in primary care settings tested in this study consists of three innovations: (1) a process for translating clinical guidelines into a checklist-based implementation guide for clinicians, (2) a physician peer coaching model, and (3) implementation support using tools from systems engineering. This project teams the experts who developed the guideline for opioid prescribing with experts in implementation science and primary care to translate the guideline into an actionable, checklist-based implementation guide. If the implementation strategy is effective in this pilot test, it will be used in a larger cluster-randomized trial to test it against other approaches to evidence-based practice adoption.The long-term goal of this research is to improve the adoption of evidence-based practices in primary care by producing a generalizable model of change.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
53132

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Wisconsin
      • Madison, Wisconsin, United States, 53705
        • University of Wisconsin - Madison

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Clinicians with prescribing authority at community-based primary care clinics

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

At each of the 4 coaching intervention sites, we aim to recruit between 3-7 clinical care providers with prescribing authority (e.g., primary care physicians, mid-level practitioners, etc.) to participate in interviews and focus groups. All clinic staff (e.g., medical assistants, office staff) are welcome to participate in coaching site visits and follow up correspondence, but only staff with prescribing authority will be considered research participants.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Residents will be excluded.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Physician coaching
This group includes 4 intervention primary care clinics that are part of the University of Wisconsin's Department of Family Medicine. These clinics will receive an organizational coaching intervention that includes in-person site visits and phone/email communication. Each participating clinic will designate one primary care physician to act as a clinic lead in working with the coach to coordinate an initial site visit (during project month 13, July 2015), a follow-up site visit (month 15, October, 2015), and communicating with the coach throughout the 6-month follow-up period via phone and email.
Other: Physician coaching

The coach will present the latest research on the benefits and risks of long-term opioid use. The presentation will be followed by a brainstorming exercise where the coach joins the clinic team in experiencing clinical practices from the perspective of a patient with chronic pain. The coach will help the clinic team flowchart clinical workflows and determine the best course for implementing aspects of a checklist-based implementation guide developed to support adoption of the guidelines for opioid prescribing.

The coach will help the team implement ideas using Plan-Do-Study-Act change cycles. The coach will maintain monthly email and phone contact with the clinic lead and clinic team after the initial site visit to monitor implementation progress and offer advice.
Control Group
This group includes 4 control primary care clinics that will not receive any intervention. A de-identified dataset will be created to examine differences in outcome variables between intervention and control clinics.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall Rate of Opioid Prescribing
Time Frame: Up to 3 years
The proportion of patients with a chronic pain diagnosis receiving daily opioids.
Up to 3 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of Opioid / Benzodiazepine Co-prescribing
Time Frame: Up to 3 years
Proportion of patients with a chronic pain diagnosis receiving daily opioids and benzodiazepines concurrently.
Up to 3 years
Urine Drug Screening Rate
Time Frame: Up to 3 years
Proportion of opioid patients completing urine drug screens prior to and during the study intervention
Up to 3 years
Mental Health Screening Rate
Time Frame: Up to 3 years
Proportion of opioid patients screened for mental health/substance use problems
Up to 3 years
Use of Pain Management Agreements
Time Frame: Up to 3 years
Proportion of opioid patients signing pain management agreements
Up to 3 years
High-dose Patients
Time Frame: Up to 3 years
Proportion of opioid prescriptions above 120 mg daily morphine equivalent
Up to 3 years
Provider Drop-out Rate
Time Frame: 3 months
Number and percentage of providers who drop out of study at 3 months
3 months
Participating Patient Demographics
Time Frame: Up to 3 years
Characteristics of participating patients vs. general patient population (race, gender, ethnicity)
Up to 3 years
Participating Clinic Characteristics
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Characteristics of participating clinics vs. non-participating clinics (number of patients, number of providers, overall opioid prescribing rate)
Up to 12 months
Participating Staff Characteristics
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Characteristics of participating staff (profession)
Up to 12 months
Intervention Fidelity
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Total hours of coaching delivered/received among all clinics that received physician coaching.
Up to 12 months
Intervention Cost
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Total cost of coaching intervention among all clinics that received physician coaching. At clinic level.
Up to 12 months
Proportion With MEDD >120 mg
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
The proportion of patients who have consistent opioid Rx above a morphine equivalent daily dose about 120 mg.
Up to 12 months
Average Morphine Equivalent Daily Dose (MEDD)
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
The average MEDD in milligrams for patients with consistent opioid Rx.
Up to 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Wisconsin, Madison

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
Center for Health Enhancement System Studies

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Andrew R Quanbeck, PhD, Center for Health Enhancement Systems Studies

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 30, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 30, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 20, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 29, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 5, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 6, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 3, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2015-0280
  • 1R34DA036720-01A1 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Pain

Clinical Trials on Physician coaching

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings