Physician Coaching to Reduce Opioid-related Harms

July 3, 2018 updated by: University of Wisconsin, Madison
This project pilot tests an innovative clinical guideline translation and physician coaching model to promote adherence to evidence-based guidelines for the prescribing of opioid pain medications in primary care settings.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This project addresses the urgent need to promote the adoption of evidence-based practices in healthcare by pilot-testing an innovative implementation strategy. The implementation strategy aims primarily to reduce variation in opioid prescribing practices for chronic pain in primary care settings.

The standard approach to improving medical practice involves groups of clinical experts reviewing the literature to produce clinical guidelines based on scientific evidence, and disseminating those guidelines by publishing them in medical journals. A clinical guideline has been developed for opioid prescribing for chronic non-cancer pain using this type of approach. The implementation strategy for promoting uptake of the guideline in primary care settings tested in this study consists of three innovations: (1) a process for translating clinical guidelines into a checklist-based implementation guide for clinicians, (2) a physician peer coaching model, and (3) implementation support using tools from systems engineering. This project teams the experts who developed the guideline for opioid prescribing with experts in implementation science and primary care to translate the guideline into an actionable, checklist-based implementation guide. If the implementation strategy is effective in this pilot test, it will be used in a larger cluster-randomized trial to test it against other approaches to evidence-based practice adoption.The long-term goal of this research is to improve the adoption of evidence-based practices in primary care by producing a generalizable model of change.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

53132

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Wisconsin
      • Madison, Wisconsin, United States, 53705
        • University of Wisconsin - Madison

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Clinicians with prescribing authority at community-based primary care clinics

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

At each of the 4 coaching intervention sites, we aim to recruit between 3-7 clinical care providers with prescribing authority (e.g., primary care physicians, mid-level practitioners, etc.) to participate in interviews and focus groups. All clinic staff (e.g., medical assistants, office staff) are welcome to participate in coaching site visits and follow up correspondence, but only staff with prescribing authority will be considered research participants.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Residents will be excluded.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Physician coaching
This group includes 4 intervention primary care clinics that are part of the University of Wisconsin's Department of Family Medicine. These clinics will receive an organizational coaching intervention that includes in-person site visits and phone/email communication. Each participating clinic will designate one primary care physician to act as a clinic lead in working with the coach to coordinate an initial site visit (during project month 13, July 2015), a follow-up site visit (month 15, October, 2015), and communicating with the coach throughout the 6-month follow-up period via phone and email.

The coach will present the latest research on the benefits and risks of long-term opioid use. The presentation will be followed by a brainstorming exercise where the coach joins the clinic team in experiencing clinical practices from the perspective of a patient with chronic pain. The coach will help the clinic team flowchart clinical workflows and determine the best course for implementing aspects of a checklist-based implementation guide developed to support adoption of the guidelines for opioid prescribing.

The coach will help the team implement ideas using Plan-Do-Study-Act change cycles. The coach will maintain monthly email and phone contact with the clinic lead and clinic team after the initial site visit to monitor implementation progress and offer advice.

Control Group
This group includes 4 control primary care clinics that will not receive any intervention. A de-identified dataset will be created to examine differences in outcome variables between intervention and control clinics.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall Rate of Opioid Prescribing
Time Frame: Up to 3 years
The proportion of patients with a chronic pain diagnosis receiving daily opioids.
Up to 3 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of Opioid / Benzodiazepine Co-prescribing
Time Frame: Up to 3 years
Proportion of patients with a chronic pain diagnosis receiving daily opioids and benzodiazepines concurrently.
Up to 3 years
Urine Drug Screening Rate
Time Frame: Up to 3 years
Proportion of opioid patients completing urine drug screens prior to and during the study intervention
Up to 3 years
Mental Health Screening Rate
Time Frame: Up to 3 years
Proportion of opioid patients screened for mental health/substance use problems
Up to 3 years
Use of Pain Management Agreements
Time Frame: Up to 3 years
Proportion of opioid patients signing pain management agreements
Up to 3 years
High-dose Patients
Time Frame: Up to 3 years
Proportion of opioid prescriptions above 120 mg daily morphine equivalent
Up to 3 years
Provider Drop-out Rate
Time Frame: 3 months
Number and percentage of providers who drop out of study at 3 months
3 months
Participating Patient Demographics
Time Frame: Up to 3 years
Characteristics of participating patients vs. general patient population (race, gender, ethnicity)
Up to 3 years
Participating Clinic Characteristics
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Characteristics of participating clinics vs. non-participating clinics (number of patients, number of providers, overall opioid prescribing rate)
Up to 12 months
Participating Staff Characteristics
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Characteristics of participating staff (profession)
Up to 12 months
Intervention Fidelity
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Total hours of coaching delivered/received among all clinics that received physician coaching.
Up to 12 months
Intervention Cost
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Total cost of coaching intervention among all clinics that received physician coaching. At clinic level.
Up to 12 months
Proportion With MEDD >120 mg
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
The proportion of patients who have consistent opioid Rx above a morphine equivalent daily dose about 120 mg.
Up to 12 months
Average Morphine Equivalent Daily Dose (MEDD)
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
The average MEDD in milligrams for patients with consistent opioid Rx.
Up to 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Andrew R Quanbeck, PhD, Center for Health Enhancement Systems Studies

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 20, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 29, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

May 5, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 6, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 3, 2018

Last Verified

July 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2015-0280
  • 1R34DA036720-01A1 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Pain

Clinical Trials on Physician coaching

3
Subscribe